Response

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

Volumn 5, Issue 2-3, 2008, Pages 223-224

  Peterson, Madelyn M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863609055     PISSN: 11767529     EISSN: 18724353     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11673-008-9103-8     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Parker, M. (2006). Prenatal diagnosis: Discrimination, medicalisation and eugenics. Monash Bioethics Review, 25(3), 41-53.
2. AMA (2004). Position statement: AMA Code of Ethics 2004. Sydney: Australian Medical Association.
3. Hildt, E. (2002). Autonomy and freedom of choice in prenatal genetic diagnosis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 5(1), 65-71.
4. Nordgren, A. (2002). Wisdom, casuistry and the goal of reproductive counselling. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 5, 281-289.
5. Parens, E., & Asch, A. (1999). The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing. Hastings Center Report, 29(5), S1-S22.
6. Edwards, S. (2004). Disability, identity and the "expressivist objection". Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 418-420.
7. Raz, A. (2005). Disability rights, prenatal diagnosis and eugenics: A cross-cultural view. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(3), 183-187.
8. Buchanan, A. (1996). Choosing who will be disabled: Genetic intervention and the morality of inclusion. Social Philosophy and Policy, 13, 18-46.
9. Gavaghan, C. (2006). Right problem, wrong solution: A pro-choice response to "Expressivist" concerns about preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 16, 20-34.
10. Clapton, J. (2003). Tragedy and catastrophe: Contentious discourses of ethics and disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(Part 7), 540-547.
11. Jordens, C. (2008). Introduction to J.R. Martin's "negotiating values: Narrative and exposition. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 5(1), 39-40.
12. Martin, J. (2008). Negotiating values: Narrative and exposition. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 5(1), 41-55.