Disability, identity and the "expressivist objection"

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 418-420

  Edwards, S D ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; ARTICLE; DISABLED PERSON; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; IDENTITY; INCIDENCE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MORALITY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRENATAL SCREENING; REPRODUCTION;

GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;

DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; GENETIC DISEASES, INBORN; HUMANS; MORALS; PHILOSOPHY, MEDICAL; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL VALUES; VALUE OF LIFE;

EID: 4344559552     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2002.002634     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Parens E, Asch A, eds. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 2000.
2. Disabled Peoples International. Disabled people speak on the new genetics. London: Disabled Peoples International Europe, 2000.
3. Buchanan A, Brock DW, Daniels N, et al. From chance to choice, genetics and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000:272.
4. Harris J. Is there a coherent social conception of disability? J Med Ethics 2000;26:95-100.
5. Harris J. The value of life. London: RKP, 1985:7.
6. Baily MA. Why I had amniocentesis. In: Parens E, Asch A, eds. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 2000:64-71.
7. Buchanan A. Genetic manipulation and the morality of inclusion. Soc philos policy 1996;13:18-46.