Conclusions: Triggers, gaps, risks and trust

International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 573-586

  Maynard, Andrew D ^a   Bowman, Diana M ^b   Hodge, Graeme A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Centre for Health Policy Programs and Economics   (Australia)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863606830     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Aitken, R.J., S.M. Hankin, B. Ross et al. (2009), A Review of Completed and Near Completed Environment, Health and Safety Research on Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, Edinburgh: SafeNano.
2. ASTM International (2006), Standard E 2456-06 - Terminology for Nanotechnology, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
3. Bauer, M.W. and G. Gaskell (eds) (2002), Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, London: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bhushan, B. (ed) (2006), Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology, New York: Springer.
5. Bowman, D.M. and G.A. Hodge (2007), 'Nanotechnology and public interest dialogue: some comparative observations', Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 27(2), 118-32.
6. British Standards Institute (BSI) (2007), PAS 136: 2007 - Terminology for nanomaterials, London: BSI.
7. Denison, R. (2008), What Was the White House Thinking?, accessed 18 December 2009 at http://blogs.edf.org/nanotechnology/2008/03/04/what-was-the-white-house-thinking/.
8. Environmental Defense (ED) and DuPont (2007), NanoRisk Framework, New York: ED.
9. European Commission (2005), Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An Action Plan for Europe 2005-2009, Brussels: European Parliament.
10. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (2009), National Statistics, accessed 23 January 2010 at www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx.
11. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2008), Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meeting on the Application of Nanotechnologies in the Food and Agriculture Sectors: Potential Food Safety Implications, Rome: FAO.
12. Gaskell, G., N. Allum, M. Bauer et al. (2000), 'Biotechnology and the European public', Nature Biotechnology, 18, 935-8.
13. Gruère, G.P. and S.R. Rao (2007), 'A review of international labeling policies of genetically modified food to evaluate India's proposed rule', AgBio Forum, 10(1), 51-64.
14. Hawking, S. (1995), 'Foreword', in Laurence M. Krauss, The Physics of Star Trek, New York: HarperCollins, xi-xiii.
15. Hodge, G.A., A.D. Maynard and D.M. Bowman (2010), 'The nanotechnology brand', paper presented at the International Research Symposium on Public Management, Bern, 7-9 April.
16. International Council on Nanotechnology (ICON) (2008), Towards Predicting Nano-Biointeractions: An International Assessment of Nanotechnology Environment, Health and Safety Research Needs, Houston: ICON.
17. International Organization for Standardization (undated), TC 229, accessed 17 December 2009 at www.iso.org/iso/iso_technical_committee?commid=381983.
18. Kearnes, M. and B. Wynne (2007), 'On nanotechnology and ambivalence: the politics of enthusiasm', NanoEthics, 1(2), 131-42.
19. Levi-Faur, D. and H. Comaneshter (2007), 'The risks of regulation and the regulation of risks: the governance of nanotechnology', in Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman and Karinne Ludlow (eds), New Global Regulatory Frontiers in Regulation: The Age of Nanotechnology, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 149-65.
20. Ludlow, K., D.M. Bowman and G.A. Hodge (2007), A Review of Possible Impacts of Nanotechnology on Australia's Regulatory Framework, Melbourne, VIC: Monash Centre for Regulatory Studies.
21. Ludlow, K., D.M. Bowman and D.D. Kirk (2009), 'Hitting the mark or falling short with nanotechnologies regulation?', Trends in Biotechnology, 27(11), 615-20.
22. Lyons, K. and J. Whelan (2010), 'Community engagement to facilitate, legitimize and accelerate the advancement of nanotechnologies in Australia', NanoEthics, 4(1), 53-66.
23. Marchant, G.E., D.J. Sylvester and K.W. Abbott (2007), 'Nanotechnology regulation: the United States approach', in Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman and Karinne Ludlow (eds), New Global Regulatory Frontiers in Regulation: The Age of Nanotechnology, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 189-211.
24. Marchant, G.E., D.J. Sylvester and K.W. Abbott (2008), 'Risk management principles for nanotechnology', NanoEthics, 2(1), 43-60.
25. Maynard, A.D., R.J. Aitken, T. Butz et al. (2006), 'Safe handling of nanotechnology', Nature, 444, 267-9.
26. Miller, G. (2009), presentation to National Enabling Technology Strategies consultation meeting, 10 August, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
27. National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (2003), The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Research and Development Supporting the Next Industrial Revolution, Washington, DC: Nanoscience Engineering and Technology Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council's Committee on Technology.
28. National Nanotechnology Initiative (2006), Environmental, Health and Safety Research Needs for Engineered Nanoscale Materials, Washington, DC: US Government.
29. National Nanotechnology Initiative (2008), Strategy for Nanotechnology-Related Environmental, Health, and Safety Research, Washington, DC: US Government.
30. National Research Council (2008), Review of Federal Strategy for Nanotechnology-Related Environmental, Health, and Safety Research, Washington, DC: National Academics Press.
31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007), OECD launches programme to test the safety of manufactured nanomaterials, 10 December, Paris: OECD.
32. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008), Nanotechnologies at the OECD, Paris: OECD.
33. Owen, R. (2009), A New Era of Responsible Innovation, 16 December, accessed 18 December 2009 at http://2020science.org/2009/12/16/owen/.
34. Owen, R., D. Baxter, T. Maynard and M. Depledge (2009), 'Beyond regulation: risk pricing and responsible innovation', Environmental Science & Technology, 43(18), 6902-6.
35. Robinson, D.K.R., A. Rip and V. Mangematin (2007), 'Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology', Research Policy, 36(6), 871-9.
36. Roco, M.C. (2003), 'Broader societal issues of nanotechnology', Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5(2), 181-9.
37. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (2008), Novel Materials in the Environment: The Case of Nanotechnology, London: RCEP.
38. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (RS-RAE) (2004), Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties, London: RS-RAE.
39. Sparrow, R. (2008), 'Talkin' bout a (nanotechnological) revolution', IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 27(2), 37-43.
40. Tait, J. (2009), 'Upstream engagement and the governance of science', EMBO reports, 10, S18-S22.
41. Taylor, M.R. (2006), Regulating the Products of Nanotechnology: Does FDA Have the Tools It Needs?, Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
42. UNICEF (2008), State of the World Children Report, Geneva: UNICEF.
43. Vogel, D. (2001), The New Politics of Risk Regulation in Europe, Berkeley, CA: Department of Political Science and the Haas School of Business, University of California.
44. Wilsdon, J. and R. Willis (2004), See-through Science - Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream, London: Demos.