Measuring femoral lesions despite CT metal artefacts: A cadaveric study

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 547-555

  Malan, Daniel F ^a,b   Botha, Charl P ^a,b   Kraaij, Gert ^a   Joemai, Raoul M S ^a   Van Der Heide, Huub J L ^a   Nelissen, Rob G H H ^a   Valstar, Edward R ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Beam hardening; Computed tomography; Metal artifact reduction; Osteolysis; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

COBALT; METAL;

ACCURACY; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BONE LESION; BONE PROSTHESIS; CADAVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL LESION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; METAL ARTIFACT REDUCTION; OSTEOLYSIS; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ARTIFACT; FEMUR; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; CADAVER; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; OSTEOLYSIS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84863603890     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: 14322161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1223-2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agarwal S. Osteolysis\-basic science, incidence and diagnosis. Curr Orthop. 2004;18:220-31.
2. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Tapia M, Martin-Hervas C. Multislice computed tomography for evaluating acetabular defects in revision THA. Clin Orthop 2007;463:138-43.
3. Claus AM, Engh CA, Sychterz CJ, Xenos JS, Orishimo KF, Engh CA. Radiographic definition of pelvic osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1519-26.
4. Cahir JG, Toms AP, Marshall TJ, Wimhurst J, Nolan J. CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:1163-71. discussion 1172-3.
5. Looney RJ, Boyd A, Totterman S, Seo G-S, Tamez-Pena J, Campbell D, et al. Volumetric computerized tomography as a measurement of periprosthetic acetabular osteolysis and its correlation with wear. Arthritis Res. 2002;4:59-63.
6. Puri L, Wixson RL, Stern SH, Kohli J, Hendrix RW, Stulberg SD. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:609-14.
7. Schwarz EM, O'Keefe RJ, Campbell D, Totterman S, Boyd A, Looney RJ. Use of volumetric computerized tomography as a primary outcome measure to evaluate drug efficacy in the prevention of peri-prosthetic osteolysis: a 1-year clinical pilot of etanercept vs. placebo. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:1049-55.
8. Walde Ta, Weiland DE, Leung SB, Kitamura N, Sychterz CJ, Engh CA, et al. Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis. Clin Orthop 2005;138-44.
9. Liu PT, Pavlicek WP, Peter MB, Spangehl MJ, Roberts CC, Paden RG. Metal artifact reduction image reconstruction algorithm for CT of implanted metal orthopedic devices: a work in progress. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:797-802.
10. Watzke O, Kalender WA. A pragmatic approach to metal artifact reduction in CT: merging of metal artifact reduced images. Eur J Radiol. 2004;14:849-56.
11. Kalender WA. Computed tomography\-fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications, 2nd ed. Erlangen: Publi-cis; 2005.
12. Lee M-J, Kim S, Lee S-A, Song H-T, Huh Y-M, Kim D-H, et al. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. Radiographics. 2007;27:791-803.
13. Hsieh J. Computed tomography: principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances. Bellingham, WA: SPIE; 2003.
14. Glover GH, Pelc NJ. An algorithm for the reduction of metal clip artifacts in CT reconstructions. Med Phys. 1981;8:799-807.
15. Kalender WA, Hebel R, Ebersberger J. Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology 1987;576-7.
16. Mahnken AH, Raupach R, Wildberger JE, Jung B, Heussen N, Flohr TG, et al. A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:769-75.
17. Bal M, Spies L. Metal artifact reduction in CT using tissue-class modeling and adaptive prefiltering. Med Phys. 2006;33:2852-9.
18. De Man B, Nuyts J, Dupont P, Marchal G, Suetens P. An iterative maximum-likelihood polychromatic algorithm for CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20:999-1008.
19. Lemmens C, Faul D, Nuyts J. Suppression of metal artifacts in CT using a reconstruction procedure that combines MAP and projection completion. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28:250-60.
20. Wang G, Frei T, Vannier MW. Fast iterative algorithm for metal artifact reduction in X-ray CT. Acad Radiol. 2000;7:607-14.
21. Link TM, Berning W, Scherf S, Joosten U, Joist A, Engelke K, et al. CT of metal implants: reduction of artifacts using an extended CT scale technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24:165-72.
22. Beers MH. The Merck manual of diagnosis and therapy, 18 ed. West Point, PA: Merck; 2006.
23. Stamenkov R, Howie D, Taylor J, Findlay D, McGee M, Kourlis G, et al. Measurement of bone defects adjacent to acetabular components of hip replacement. Clin Orthop 2003;117-24.
24. Weiland DE. Walde Ta, Leung SB, Sychterz CJ, Ho S, Engh CA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of periprosthetic acetabular osteolysis: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:713-9.
25. Mukherjee D, Rajagopalan S. CT and MR angiography of the peripheral circulation: practical approach with clinical protocols. Andover, Hampshire, UK: Thomson; 2007.
26. Douglas-Akinwande AC, Buckwalter KA, Rydberg J, Rankin JL, Choplin RH. Multichannel CT: evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware. Radiographics. 2006;26 Suppl 1:S97-S110.
27. Veldkamp WJH, Joemai RMS, van der Molen AJ, Geleijns J. Development and validation of segmentation and interpolation techniques in sinograms for metal artifact suppression in CT. Med Phys. 2010;37(2):620-8.
28. Oehler M, Kratz B, Knopp T, Müller J, Buzug TM. Evaluation of surrogate data quality in sinogram-based CT metal-artifact reduction. In: SPIE symposium on optical engineering\-image reconstruction from incomplete data conference, August 2008, San Diego, p. 1-10.
29. Maleike D, Nolden M, Meinzer H-P, Wolf I. Interactive segmentation framework of the Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009;96:72-83.
30. van der Lijn F, den Heijer T, Breteler MMB, Niessen WJ. Hippocampus segmentation in MR images using atlas registration, voxel classification, and graph cuts. NeuroImage. 2008;43 (4):708-20.
31. Botha CP, Post FH. Hybrid scheduling in the DeVIDE dataflow visualisation environment. Proc Simul Visualization. 2008;1:309-22.
32. Leung S, Naudie D, Kitamura N, Walde T, Engh CA. Computed tomography in the assessment of periacetabular osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:592-7.
33. Bauer TW, Schils J. The pathology of total joint arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol. 1999;28:483-97.
34. Sofka CM. Current applications of advanced cross-sectional imaging techniques in evaluating the painful arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:183-93.