Technological hype and disappointment: Lessons from the hydrogen and fuel cell case

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 549-563

  Bakker, Sjoerd ^a   Budde, Björn ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b AIT AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

expectations; fuel cells; hydrogen; innovation; technological hypes

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; FUEL CELL; HYDROGEN; INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ROLE;

EID: 84863601082     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2012.693662     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abernathy, W. J. and Utterback, J. M. 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation,: 41-7.
2. Bakker, S. 2010. The car industry and the blow-out of the hydrogen hype. Energy Policy, 38(11): 6540-4.
3. Bakker, S., van Lente, H. and Meeus, M. 2011. Arenas of expectations for hydrogen technologies. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78(1): 152-62.
4. Bakker, S., van Lente, H. and Meeus, M. T.H. 2012. Credible expectations-the US Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program as enactor and selector of hydrogen technologies. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79(6): 1059-71.
5. Berkhout, F. 2006. Normative expectations in systems innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3): 299-311.
6. BMVBS, BMBF, and BMWi. 2006. Nationales Innovationsprogramm Wasserstoff- und Brennstoffzellentechnologie. Berlin, Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie.
7. Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K. and van Lente, H. 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3-4): 285-98.
8. Brown, N. 2003. Hope against hype-accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies, 16(2): 3-21.
9. Brown, N. and Michael, M. 2003. A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(1): 3-18.
10. Budde, B. 'The talking' and 'the doing': Discourse and innovation strategies in the automotive industry. 2nd International Conference on Sustainability Transitions. 13-15, in Lund, Sweden.
11. Budde, B., and K. Konrad. 2009. Interrelated visions and expectations on fuel cells as a source of dynamics for sustainable transition processes. KSI conference, June 4-5, in Amsterdam.
12. Budde, B., Weber, K. M. and Alkemade, F. 2012. Expectations as a key to understanding actor strategies in the field of fuel cell and hydrogen vehicles. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79(6): 1072-83.
13. Collantes, G. and Sperling, D. 2008. The origin of California's zero emission vehicle mandate. Transportation Research Part A, 42(10): 1302-13.
14. Cyert, R. M., Dill, W. R. and March, J. G. 1958. The role of expectations in business decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3(3): 307-40.
15. Daimler AG. 2011. Daimler 360-fakten zur nachhaltigkeit (Daimler 360-facts about sustainability. Stuttgart, Germany: Daimler AG.
16. David, P. A. 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2): 332-7.
17. Dignum, M. and Verbong, G. The History of the Concept of the Hydrogen Economy. SHOT Annual Meeting. October11-14, in Lisbon, Portugal.
18. Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11(3): 147-62.
19. ERTRAC. 2010. Electrification roadmap: European roadmap electrification of road transport, Brussels: ERTRAC.
20. European Commission. 2003. Hydrogen energy and fuel cells-a vision of our future. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. EUR 20719: 36.
21. European Commission. 2010. A European strategy on clean and energy efficient vehicles. COM(2010)186 final.
22. European Commission and New Energy World IG. 2008. Developing new energy for the future: Europe launches a 1 billion Euro project to get into pole position for the fuel cells and hydrogen race, Press Release: Brussels.
23. Faber, A. and Frenken, K. 2009. Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: Towards an evolutionary environmental economics. Evolutionary Methodologies for Analyzing Environmental Innovations and the Implications for Environmental Policy, 76(4): 462-70.
24. Fenn, J. and Raskino, M. 2008. Mastering the hype cycle: How to choose the right innovation at the right time, Boston: Harvard Business Press.
25. Garud, R. and Ahlstrom, D. 1997. Technology assessment: A socio-cognitive perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14(1): 25-48.
26. Gerard, D. and Lave, L. B. 2005. Implementing technology-forcing policies: The 1970 clean air act amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the United States. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 72(7): 761-78.
27. HFP Europe. 2006. Achievements and perspectives-2006, Brussels: European Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Technology Platform.
28. HFP Europe. 2007. Implementation plan-status 2006, Brussels: European Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Technology Platform.
29. Hultman, M. 2009. Back to the future: The dream of a perpetuum mobile in the atomic society and the hydrogen economy. Futures, 41(4): 226-33.
30. Kalhammer, F. R., Prokopius, P. R., Roan, V. P. and Voecks, G. E. 1998. Status and prospects of fuel cells as automobile engines, Sacramento, CA: State of California Air Resources Board.
31. Konrad, K. 2006. The social dynamics of expectations: The interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3-4): 429-44.
32. Konrad, K., Markard, J., Ruef, A. and Truffer, B. 2012. Strategic responses to fuel cell hype & disappointment. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79(6): 1084-98.
33. Larrue, P. 2003. Lessons learned from the Californian ZEV mandate: From a 'technology-forcing' to a 'market-driven' regulation, Bordeaux: Cahiers du GRES.
34. Merton, R. K. 1948. The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2): 193-210.
35. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change, Boston: Belknap Press.
36. Rip, A. 2006. Folk theories of nanotechnologists. Science as Culture, 15(4): 349-65.
37. Rosenberg, N. 1976. On technological expectations. The Economic Journal, 86(343): 523-35.
38. Ruef, A. and Markard, J. 2010. What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(3): 317-38.
39. Service, R. F. 2009. Hydrogen cars: Fad or the future?. Science, 324(5932): 1257-9.
40. The White House. 2011. Blueprint for a secure energy future, Washington, DC: The White House.
41. Tollefson, J. 2010. Hydrogen vehicles: Fuel of the future. Nature, 464(7293): 1262-4.
42. van Lente, H. 1993. Promising technology: The dynamics of expectations in technological developments, Enschede: Twente University.
43. van Lente, H. and Bakker, S. 2010. Competing expectations: The case of hydrogen storage technologies. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(6): 693-709.
44. van Lente, H., C. Spitters, and A. Peine. 2011. Comparing technological hype cycles: Towards a theory, ISU working paper series #11.03, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
45. Wuestenhagen, R., R. Wuebker, M.J. Buerer, and D. Goddard, 2009. Financing fuel-cell market development: Exploring the role of expectation dynamics in venture capital investment. In Innovation, markets, and sustainable energy: The challenge of hydrogen and fuel cells, ed. S. Pogutz, A. Russo, and P. Migliavacca, 118-37. Cheltenham, UK and Lyme, US: Edward Elgar.