Molecular docking with opposition-based differential evolution

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1387-1392

  Koohi Moghadam, Mohamad ^a   Rahmani, Adel Torkaman ^a  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

metaheuristic algorithms; molecular docking problem; opposition based differential evolution; protein ligand complex; scoring function

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; META HEURISTIC ALGORITHM; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROTEIN-LIGAND COMPLEXES; SCORING FUNCTIONS;

COMPLEXATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; MOLECULAR MODELING; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84863597129     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2245276.2231996     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Oduguwa, A., Tiwari, A., Roy, R. and Bessant, C. An Overview of Soft Computing Techniques Used in the Drug Discovery Process. Applied Soft Computing Technologies: The Challenge of Complexity (2006), 465-480.
2. Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R. and Ferrin, T. E. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions* 1. Journal of molecular biology, 161, 2 (1982), 269- 288.
3. Liu, M. and Wang, S. MCDOCK: a Monte Carlo simulation approach to the molecular docking problem. Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 13, 5 (1999), 435-451. (Pubitemid 29395560)
4. Moré, J. J. and Wu, Z. Distance geometry optimization for protein structures. Journal of Global Optimization, 15, 3 (1999), 219-234. (Pubitemid 129620084)
5. Meier, R., Pippel, M., Brandt, F., Sippl, W. and Baldauf, C. ParaDockS: A Framework for Molecular Docking with Population-Based Metaheuristics. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 50, 5 (2010), 879-889.
6. Morris, G. M., Goodsell, D. S., Halliday, R. S., Huey, R., Hart, W. E., Belew, R. K. and Olson, A. J. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. Journal of computational chemistry, 19, 14 (1998), 1639-1662. (Pubitemid 128590223)
7. Perola, E., Walters, W. P. and Charifson, P. S. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance. PROTEINS-NEW YORK-. 56 (2004), 235-249. (Pubitemid 38850158)
8. Warren, G. L., Andrews, C. W., Capelli, A. M., Clarke, B., LaLonde, J., Lambert, M. H., Lindvall, M., Nevins, N., Semus, S. F. and Senger, S. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. Journal of medicinal chemistry, 49, 20 (2006), 5912-5931. (Pubitemid 44484938)
9. Goodsell, D. S. and Olson, A. J. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 8, 3 (1990), 195-202. (Pubitemid 20363304)
10. AutoDock http://autodock.scripps.edu/. City, 2011.
11. Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R. and Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking1. Journal of molecular biology, 267, 3 (1997), 727-748. (Pubitemid 27170693)
12. Baxter, C. A., Murray, C. W., Clark, D. E., Westhead, D. R. and Eldridge, M. D. Flexible docking using tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 33, 3 (1998), 367-382. (Pubitemid 28516342)
13. Janson, S., Merkle, D. and Middendorf, M. Molecular docking with multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 8, 1 (2008), 666-675. (Pubitemid 47374597)
14. Oduguwa, A., Tiwari, A., Fiorentino, S. and Roy, R. Multiobjective optimisation of the protein-ligand docking problem in drug discovery. GECCO (2006).
15. Korb, O., Stützle, T. and Exner, T. PLANTS: Application of ant colony optimization to structure-based drug design. Ant Colony Optimization and Swarm Intelligence2006), 247-258.
16. Thomsen, R. Flexible ligand docking using differential evolution. IEEE, City, 2003.
17. Storn, R. and Price, K. Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11, 4 1997), 341-359. (Pubitemid 127502202)
18. Vesterstrom, J. and Thomsen, R. A comparative study of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization, and evolutionary algorithms on numerical benchmark problems. IEEE, City, 2004.
19. Rahnamayan, S., Tizhoosh, H. R. and Salama, M. M. A. Opposition-based differential evolution. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 12, 1 2008), 64-79. (Pubitemid 351330332)
20. Morris, G. M., Huey, R. and Olson, A. J. Using AutoDock for ligand-receptor docking. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics, 11, 3 2008), 34-37.
21. Sadjad, B. S. and Zsoldos, Z. Toward a Robust Search Method for the Protein-Drug Docking Problem. IEEE IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics2010), 1120-1133.
22. Rapaport, D. Molecular dynamics simulation using quaternions. Journal of Computational Physics, 60, 2 1985), 306-314.
23. Karney, C. F. F. Quaternions in molecular modeling. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 25, 5 2007), 595-604. (Pubitemid 46177678)
24. Shoemake, K. Uniform Random Rotations. Academic Press, City, 1992.
25. Solis, F. J. Minimization by random search techniques. Mathematics of operations research (1981), 19-30.
26. PDB www.rcsb.org, 2011.