Exploiting majority acceptable arguments for ontology Matching

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 8, Issue 12 S, 2012, Pages 1-19

  Trojahn, Cassia ^a   Quaresma, Paulo ^b   Vieira, Renata ^c  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

^c PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Argumentation frameworks; Evaluation; Ontology matching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863566236     PISSN: 09740635     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Amgoud, L. and Cayrol, C. 1998. On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation, Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (California), pp. 1-7.
2. Amgoud, L. and Cayrol, C. 2002. A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34(1-3): 197-215.
3. Bailin, S. C. and Truszkowski, W. 2002. Ontology negotiation between intelligent information agents, Knowledge Engineering Review 17(1): 7-19.
4. Bench-Capon, T. 2003. Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks, Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3): 429-448.
5. Bench-Capon, T. and Dunne, P. 2002. Value-based argumentation frameworks, Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool.
6. Beun, R.-J., van Eijk, R. M. and Prust, H. 2004. Ontological feedback in multiagent systems, Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC (USA), pp. 110-117.
7. Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Konieczny, S., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C. and Marquis, P. 2007. On the merging of dung's argumentation systems, Artificial Intelligence 171(10-15): 730-753.
8. Curino, C., Orsi, G. and Tanca, L. 2007a. X-SOM: A flexible ontology mapper, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC (USA), pp. 424-428.
9. Curino, C., Orsi, G. and Tanca, L. 2007b. X-SOM results for OAEI 2007, Proceedings of the 2nd International Ontology Matching Workshop, Busan (Korea), pp. 276-285.
10. Dung, P. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77(2): 321-357.
11. Euzenat, J., Isaac, A., Meilicke, C., Shvaiko, P., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sváb, O., Svátek, V., van Hage, W. R. and Yatskevich, M. 2007. Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2007, in P. Shvaiko, J. Euzenat, F. Giunchiglia and B. He (eds), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Ontology Matching, Vol. 304 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org.
12. Euzenat, J., Mochol, M., Shvaiko, P., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sváb, O., Svátek, V., van Hage, W. R. and Yatskevich, M. 2006. Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2006, in P. Shvaiko, J. Euzenat, N. F. Noy, H. Stuckenschmidt, V. R. Benjamins and M. Uschold (eds), Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Ontology Matching, Vol. 225 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS. org.
13. Euzenat, J. and Shvaiko, P. 2007. Ontology Matching, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (DE).
14. Euzenat, J. and Valtchev, P. 2004. Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-Lite, Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 16, IOS Press, pp. 333-337.
15. Fensel, D. 2003. Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce, 2nd edn, Springer-Verlag, New York (USA).
16. Hu, W. and Qu, Y. 2008. Falcon-AO: A practical ontology matching system, Journal of Web Semantics 6(3): 237-239.
17. Jean-Mary, Y. and Kabuka, M. 2007a. ASMOV: Ontology alignment with semantic validation, Joint SWDB-ODBIS Workshop on Semantics, Ontologies, Databases, Vienna (Austria), pp. 15-20.
18. Jean-Mary, Y. and Kabuka, M. 2007b. ASMOV results for OAEI 2007, Proceedings of the 2nd International Ontology Matching Workshop, Busan (Korea), pp. 141-150.
19. Joachims, T. 2002. Learning to Classify Text Using Support Vector Machines-Methods, Theory and Algorithms, Vol. 668 of The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers/Springer.
20. Kiu, C.-C. and Lee, C.-S. 2006. Ontology mapping and merging through OntoDNA for learning object reusability, Journal of Educational Technology and Society 9(3): 27-42.
21. Kiu, C.-C. and Lee, C.-S. 2007. OntoDNA: Ontology alignment results for OAEI 2007, Proceedings of the 2nd International Ontology Matching Workshop, Busan (Korea), pp. 196-204.
22. Laera, L., Blacoe, I., Tamma, V., Payne, T., Euzenat, J. and Bench-Capon, T. 2007. Argumentation over ontology correspondences in MAS, Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, ACM, New York (USA), pp. 1-8.
23. Laera, L., Tamma, V., Euzenat, J., Bench-Capon, T. and Payne, T. 2006a. Reaching agreement over ontology alignments, Proceedings of the 5th International SemanticWeb Conference, Vol. 4273/2006 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin (DE), pp. 371-384.
24. Laera, L., Tamma, V., Euzenat, J., Bench-Capon, T. and Payne, T. 2006b. Reaching agreement over ontology alignments, Proceedings of the 5th International SemanticWeb Conference, Vol. 4273/2006 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin (DE), pp. 371-384.
25. Lambrix, P. and Tan, H. 2006. SAMBO: A system for aligning and merging biomedical ontologies, Journal of Web Semantics 4(3): 196-206.
26. Mao, M. and Peng, Y. 2007. The PRIOR+: Results for OAEI campaign 2007, Proceedings of the 2nd International Ontology Matching Workshop, Busan (Korea), pp. 219-226.
27. Morge, M. and Routier, J.-C. 2007. Debating over heterogeneous descriptions, Applied Ontology, Special issue on Formal Ontology for Communicating Agents 2(3-4): 333-349.
28. Nagy, M., Vargas-Vera, M. and Motta, E. 2007. DSSim-managing uncertainty on the semantic web, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Ontology Matching, Busan (Korea).
29. Qu, Y., Hu, W. and Cheng, G. 2006. Constructing virtual documents for ontology matching, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, ACM, New York (USA), pp. 23-31.
30. Silva, N., Maio, P. and Rocha, J. 2005. An approach to ontology mapping negotiation, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Capture Workshop on Integrating Ontologies, ACM, Banf (Canada), pp. 1-7.
31. Spiliopoulos, V., Valarakos, A., Vouros, G. and Karkaletsis, V. 2007. SEMA: Results for the ontology alignment contest OAEI 2007, Proceedings of the 2nd International Ontology Matching Workshop, Busan (Korea), pp. 244-254.
32. Tamma, V., Wooldridge, M., Blacoe, I. and Dickinson, I. 2002. An ontology based approach to automated negotiation, Revised Papers from the Workshop on Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce on Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce IV, Designing Mechanisms and Systems, Springer-Verlag, London (UK), pp. 219-237.
33. Tan, H. and Lambrix, P. 2007. SAMBO results for the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2007, Proceedings of the 2nd International Ontology Matching Workshop, Busan (Korea), pp. 236-243.
34. Tang, J., Liang, B., Li, J.-Z. and Wang, K. 2004. Risk minimization based ontology mapping, Advanced Workshop on Content Computing, Vol. 3309 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, pp. 469-480.
35. Trojahn, C., Quaresma, P. and Vieira, R. 2008a. An argumentation framework based on confidence degrees to combine ontology mapping approaches, International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 2(3): 142-150.
36. Trojahn, C., Quaresma, P. and Vieira, R. 2008b. An argumentation framework based on strength for ontology mapping, Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, Vol. 4, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (DE), pp. 57-71.
37. Trojahn, C., Quaresma, P., Vieira, R. and Moraes, M. 2008. A cooperative approach for composite ontology mapping, LNCS Journal on Data Semantic X (JoDS) 4900(0): 237-263.
38. van Diggelen, J., Beun, R.-J., Dignum, F., van Eijk, R. M. and Meyer, J.-J. 2006. ANEMONE: An effective minimal ontology negotiation environment, Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, ACM, New York (USA), pp. 899-906.
39. Wang, P. and Xu, B. 2007. LILY: The results for the ontology alignment contest OAEI 2007, Proceedings of the 2nd International Ontology Matching Workshop, Busan (Korea), pp. 179-185.
40. Zargayouna, H., Safar, B. and Reynaud, C. 2007. TaxoMap in the OAEI 2007 alignment contest, Proceedings of the 2nd International Ontology Matching Workshop, Busan (Korea), pp. 268-275.