A jump to the left (and then a step to the right): Reading practices within academic ebooks

Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 202-210

  McKay, Dana ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

books; document triage; ebooks; in document navigation; information behaviour; information use; reading

Indexed keywords

BOOKS; DOCUMENT TRIAGE; E-BOOKS; INFORMATION BEHAVIOUR; READING;

INFORMATION USE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING;

EID: 84863521411     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2071536.2071569     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Adler, A., Gujar, A., Harrison, B. L., O'Hara, K. and Sellen, A. A diary study of work-related reading: design implications for digital reading devices. Proc. CHI '98, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. (1998), 241-248.
2. Alexander, J. and Cockburn, A. An empirical characterisation of electronic document navigation. Proc. Graphics Interface 2008, Canadian Information Processing Society. (2008).
3. Badi, R., Bae, S., Moore, J. M., Meintanis, K., Zacchi, A., Hsieh, H., Shipman, F. and Marshall, C. C. Recognizing user interest and document value from reading and organizing activities in document triage. Proc. IUI '06, ACM. (2006).
4. Bae, S., Marshall, C. C., Meintanis, K., Zacchi, A., Hsieh, H., Moore, J. M. and Shipman, F. M. Patterns of reading and organizing information in document triage. ASIST Proceedings 43, 1, (2006) 1-27.
5. Bailey, T. P. Electronic Book Usage at a Master's Level I University: A Longitudinal Study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32, 1, (2006) 52-59.
6. Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K. and Dawson, D. Not on the Same Page: Undergraduates' Information Retrieval in Electronic and Print Books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 36, 6, (2010) 518-525.
7. Bishop, A. P. Digital libraries and knowledge disaggregation: the use of journal article components. Proc. DL '98, ACM. (1998), 29-39.
8. Blustein, J., Rowe, D. and Graff, A.-B. Making Sense in the Margins: A field study of annotation. Proc. TPDL 11, Springer. (2011), to appear.
9. Buchanan, G. and McKay, D. In the Bookshop: Examining Popular Search Strategies. Proc. JCDL 2011, ACM. (2011).
10. Buchanan, G. and Owen, T. Improving skim reading for document triage. Proc. IIiX '08, ACM. (2008), 83-88.
11. Christianson, M. Patterns of use of electronic books. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 29, 4, (2005) 351-363.
12. Christianson, M. and Aucoin, M. Electronic or print books: Which are used? Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 29, 1, (2005) 71-81.
13. Connaway, L. S. and Snyder, C. Transaction Log Analyses of Electronic Book (E-book) Usage. Against the Grain 17, 1, (2005) 85-89.
14. Cox, J. Making Sense of E-book Usage Data. The Acquisitions Librarian 19, 3, (2008) 193-212.
15. Dillon, A. Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics 35, 10, (1992) 1297-1326.
16. George, C., Bright, A., Hurlbert, T., Linke, E. C., St. Clair, G. and Stein, J. Scholarly use of information: Graduate students' information seeking behavior. Information Research 11, 4, (2006).
17. Greifeneder, E. The Impact of Distraction in Natural Environments on User Experience Research Proc. TPDL 11, Springer. (2011), to appear.
18. Hamblen. Amazon: E-books now outsell print books, Computerworld (2011). Available at: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9216869/Amazon-E-books-now- outsell-print-books
19. Hardy, G. and Davies, T. Letting the patrons choose: using EBL as a method for unmediated acquisition of ebook materials. Proc. Information Online 2007, ALIA. (2007).
20. Hernon, P., Hopper, R., Leach, M. R., Saunders, L. L. and Zhang, J. E-book Use by Students: Undergraduates in Economics, Literature, and Nursing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 33, 1, (2007) 3-13.
21. Jansen, B. J. and Spink, A. How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing & Management 42, 1, (2006) 248-263.
22. Jones, S., Cunningham, S. J. and McNab, R. An Analysis of Usage of a Digital Library. Proc. ECDL'98, Springer. (1998), 261-277.
23. Lau, E. P. and Goh, D. H.-L. In search of query patterns: A case study of a university OPAC. Information Processing & Management 42, 5, (2006) 1316-1329.
24. Li, C., Poe, F., Potter, M., Quigley, B. and Wilson, J. UC Libraries Academic e-Book Usage Survey. University of California, Springer, California Digital Libraries (2011).
25. Liesaputra, V. and Ian, W. H. Seeking information in realistic books: a user study. Proc. JCDL '08, ACM. (2008), 29-38.
26. Littman, J. and Connaway, L. S. A Circulation Analysis of Print Books and E-Books in an Academic Research Library. Library Resources & Technical Services 48, (2004) 256-262.
27. Loizides, F. Investigating Document Triage on Paper and Electronic Media. Proc. ECDL 2007, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. (2007), 416-427.
28. Loizides, F. and Buchanan, G. An Empirical Study of User Navigation during Document Triage. Proc. ECDL 2009, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. (2009), 138-149.
29. MacFayden, H. The Reader's Devices: The affordances of ebook readers. Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management 7, 1, (2011).
30. Malama, C., Landoni, M. and Wilson, R. Fiction Electronic Books: A Usability Study. Proc. ECDL '04, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. (2004), 69-79.
31. Marshall, C. C. Reading and Writing the Electronic Book. Chapel Hill, NC USA, Morgan & Claypool (2010).
32. Marshall, C. C. and Bly, S. Turning the page on navigation. Proc. JCDL'05, ACM. (2005), 225-234.
33. McKay, D. Gotta keep 'em separated: Why the single search box may not be right for libraries. Proc. CHINZ '11, ACM. (2011), to appear.
34. McKay, D. and Buchanan, G. One of these things is not like the others: how users search different information resources. Proc. TPDL 11. (2011), to appear.
35. McKay, D. and Conyers, B. Where the streets have no name: how library users get lost in the stacks. Proc. 11th Annual ACM SIGCHI NZ Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHINZ 2010), ACM. (2010), in press.
36. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. and Watkinson, D. Scholarly Journal Usage: The Results of Deep Log Analysis. Journal of Documentation 61, 2, (2005) 248-280.
37. O'Hara, K. and Sellen, A. A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. Proc. CHI '97, ACM. (1997).
38. Ooi, K. How Adult Fiction Readers Select Fiction Books in Public Libraries: A Study of Information Seeking in Context. School of Information Management. Victoria University of Wellington (2008).
39. Pearson, J., Buchanan, G. and Thimbleby, H. HCI design principles for ereaders. Proc. Booksonline '10, ACM. (2010).
40. Rettig, J., Bandelin, J. and Park, L. E-books: what have we learned? Where are we going? Proc. ACRL National Conference, ACRL. (2003).
41. Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H. R. and Huntington, P. What do faculty and students really think about e-books? Aslib Proceedings 59, 6, (2007) 489-511.
42. Shelburne, W. A. E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and behaviors. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 33, 2-3, (2009) 59-72.
43. Stelmaszewska, H. and Blandford, A. From physical to digital: a case study of computer scientists' behaviour in physical libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries 4, 2, (2004) 82-92.
44. Stieve, T. and Schoen, D. Undergraduate Students' Book Selection: A Study of Factors in the Decision-Making Process. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32, 6, (2006) 599-608.
45. Talja, S. and Maula, H. Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines. Journal of Documentation 59, 6, (2003) 673-691.
46. Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Edwards, S. and Wu, L. Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings 61, 1, (2009) 5-32.
47. Thayer, A., Lee, C. P., Hwang, L. H., Sales, H., Sen, P. and Dalal, N. The imposition and superimposition of digital reading technology: the academic potential of e-readers. Proc. CHI 2011, ACM. (2011).