Undergraduate Students' Book Selection: A Study of Factors in the Decision-Making Process

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 599-608

  Stieve, Thomas ^a   Schoen, David ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NIAGARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751540416     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2006.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Banks J. Does the Number of Subject Headings on a Bibliographic Record Affect Circulation Intensity?. Technical Services Quarterly 21 3 (2004) 17-24
2. Blecic D. Monograph Use at an Academic Health Sciences Library: The First Three Years of Shelf Life. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 88 (2000, April) 145-151
3. Britten W., and Webster J. Comparing Characteristics of Highly Circulated Titles for Demand-Driven Collection Development. College & Research Libraries 53 (1992, May) 239-248
4. Connell T.H. Comparing the Circulation of Library Materials Ordered by Faculty and Librarians. Collection Management 14 1/2 (1991) 73-84
5. Dinkins D. Circulation as Assessment: Collection Development Policies Evaluated in Terms of Circulation at a Small Academic Library. College & Research Libraries 13 (2003, January) 46-53
6. Hamaker C. Time Series Circulation Data for Collection Development Or: You Can't Intuit That. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory 19 2 (1995) 191-195
7. Saunders S.E. The Effect of Quality on Circulation in an Aging Collection. Collection Management 20 3/4 (1996) 149-156
8. Twait M. Undergraduate Students' Source Selection Criteria: A Qualitative Study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 31 6 (1995) 567-573
9. Xu Y.(C.), and Chen Z. Relevance Judgment: What Do Users Consider Beyond Topicality?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 67 7 (2006) 961-973
10. Barry C.L. User-Defined Relevance Criteria: An Exploratory Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45 3 (1994) 149-159
11. Burton V.T., and Chadwick S.A. Investigating the Practices of Student Researchers: Patterns of Use and Criteria for Use of Internet and Library Sources. Computers and Composition 17 3 (2000) 309-328
12. Aaker D.A., Kumar V., and Day G.S. Marketing Research. 7th ed. (2001), John Wiley & Sons, New York
13. Weber R.P. Basic Content Analysis. 2nd ed. (1990), Sage Publications, Beverly Hills
14. American Library Association, "Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education," (2000). Available: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm (April 27, 2006).