Performance-based earthquake assessment of bridge systems including ground-foundation interaction

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 42, Issue , 2012, Pages 184-196

  Mackie, Kevin R ^a   Lu, Jinchi ^b   Elgamal, Ahmed ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE SYSTEMS; DAMAGE STATE; HAZARD CURVES; INTENSITY-DEPENDENT; NONLINEAR TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE GROUP; PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; PROTOTYPE BRIDGES; REPAIR COSTS; SENSITIVITY STUDIES; SOIL PROFILES; SYSTEM COMPONENTS; TIME RESPONSE; VARYING STIFFNESS;

DAMAGE DETECTION; EARTHQUAKES; FOUNDATIONS; OVERPASSES; REINFORCED CONCRETE; REPAIR; SOILS;

HIGHWAY BRIDGES;

BRIDGE; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; FOUNDATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SOIL PROFILE;

AGROSTIS;

EID: 84863518993     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.05.023     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology. Earthquake model, HAZUS MR4 technical manual, Washington DC, 2003.
2. Werner SD, Taylor CE, Cho S, Lavoie J-P, Huyck C, Eitzel C, et al. REDARS2: methodology and software for seismic risk analysis of highway systems. Report no. MCEER-06-SP08, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. Buffalo, NY 2006.
3. Bocchini P, Frangopol DM A stochastic computational framework for the joint transportation network fragility analysis and traffic flow distribution under extreme events. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 2011, 26:182-193.
4. Solberg KM, Dhakal RP, Mander JB, Bradley BA Computational and rapid expected annual loss estimation methodologies for structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008, 37:81-101.
5. Mackie KR, Stojadinovic B R-factor parameterized bridge damage fragility curves. Journal of Bridge Engineering 2007, 12(4):500-510.
6. Ledezma CA, Bray JD. Performance-based earthquake engineering design evaluation procedure for bridge foundations undergoing liquefaction-induced lateral spreading. Report no. 2008/05, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 2008.
7. Basöz N, Mander J Enhancement of the highway transportation lifeline module in HAHUS 1999, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington DC.
8. Jeremic B, Jie G, Preisig M, Tafazzoli N Time domain simulation of soil-foundation-structure interaction in non-uniform soils. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2009, 38:699-718.
9. Mylonakis G, Syngros C, Gazetas G, Tazoh T The role of soil in the collapse of 18 piers of Hanshin expressway in the Kobe earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006, 35:547-575.
10. Elgamal A, Yan L, Yang Z, Conte JP Three-dimensional seismic response of Humboldt Bay bridge-foundation-ground system. Journal of Structural Engineering 2008, 134(7):1165-1176.
11. Jeremic B, Kunnath S, Xiong F Influence of soil-foundation-structure interaction on seismic response of the I-880 viaduct. Engineering Structures 2004, 26:391-402.
12. Kwon O-S, Elnashai AS Seismic analysis of Meloland Road overcrossing using multiplatform simulation software including SSI. Journal of Structural Engineering 2008, 134(4):651-660.
13. Cornell CA, Krawinkler H Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 2000, 3(2).
14. Bradley BA, Cubrinovski M, Dhakal RP, MacRae GA Probabilistic seismic performance and loss assessment of a bridge-foundation-soil system. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2010, 30:395-411.
15. Zhang J, Huo Y, Brandenberg SJ, Kashighandi P Effects of structural characterizations on fragility functions of bridges subject to seismic shaking and lateral spreading. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2008, 7(4):369-382.
16. Mackie KR, Lu J, Elgamal A. User interface for performance-based earthquake engineering: a single bent bridge pilot investigation. In: Proceedings of the 9th US National and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, July 25-29, 2010, Toronto, Canada.
17. Mackie KR, Wong J-M, Stojadinovic B. Integrated probabilistic performance-based evaluation of benchmark reinforced concrete bridges. Report no. 2007/09, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 2008.
18. Kramer SL, Arduino P, Shin H-S. Using OpenSees for performance-based evaluation of bridges on liquefiable soils. Report no. 2008/07, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 2008.
19. Elgamal A, Lu J, Forcellini D Mitigation of liquefaction-induced lateral deformation in a sloping stratum: 3D numerical simulation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2009, 135(11):1672-1682.
20. Elgamal A, Lu J. A framework for 3D finite element analysis of lateral pile system response, Geotechnical special publication no. 186, Proceedings international foundations congress and equipment Expo'09, Orlando FL, March 15-19, 2009, pp. 616-23.
21. Lu J, Yang Z, Elgamal A. OpenSeesPL three-dimensional lateral pile-ground interaction version 1.00 user's manual. Report no. SSRP-06/03, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego CA, 2006.
22. Mackie KR, Wong J-M, Stojadinovic B Post-earthquake bridge repair cost and repair time estimation methodology. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2010, 39(3):281-301.
23. Mackie KR, Wong J-M, Stojadinovic B Bridge damage and loss scenarios calibrated by schematic design and cost estimation of repairs. Earthquake Spectra 2011, 27:1127-1145.
24. Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria version 1.3, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento CA, 2003.
25. Ketchum M, Chang V, Shantz T. Influence of design ground motion level on highway bridge costs, Report no. Lifelines 6D01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 2004.
26. Mackie KR, Stojadinovic B. Fragility basis for California highway overpass bridge seismic decision making, Report no. 2005/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 2005.
27. Aviram A, Mackie KR, Stojadinovic B Effect of abutment modeling on the seismic response of bridge structures. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2008, 7(4):395-402.
28. Idriss IM, Sun JI User's manual for SHAKE91: a computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits 2003, University of California Press, Davis CA.
29. Kramer SL Geotechnical earthquake engineering 1996, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
30. Medina RA, Krawinkler H. Seismic demands for nondeteriorating frame structures and their dependence on ground motions. Report no. 2003/15, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 2003.
31. Porter KA, Beck JL, Shaikhutdinov RV Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables. Earthquake Spectra 2002, 18(4):719-743.
32. Na UJ, Chaudhuri SR, Shinozuka M Probabilistic assessment for seismic performance of port structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2008, 28(2):147-158.