Bridge damage and loss scenarios calibrated by schematic design and cost estimation of repairs

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1127-1145

  Mackie, Kevin R ^a   Wong, John Michael ^b   Stojadinovic, Bozidar ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST ESTIMATING; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMOLOGY;

BRIDGE DAMAGE; BRIDGE REPAIRS; COST ESTIMATIONS; MODEL PARAMETERS; PARAMETERIZED; SCHEMATIC DESIGN; STATE PRACTICE; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK;

REPAIR;

BRIDGE; CALIBRATION; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; COST ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; PROBABILITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; REPAIR; SEISMIC DESIGN;

EID: 84856047434     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.3651362     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Basöz, N. I., Kiremidjian A. S., King, S. A., and Law K. H., 1999. Statistical analysis of bridge damage data from the 1994 Northridge, CA, Earthquake Spectra 15, 25-54.
2. Berry, M. P., and Eberhard, M. O., 2003. Performance Models for Flexural Damage in Reinforced Concrete Columns, Tech, Rep. 2003/18, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
3. Bozorgzadeh, A., 2007. Effect of Structure Backfill on Stiffness and Capacity of Bridge Abutments, PhD dissertation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
4. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 1994. Bridge Deck Joints and Deck Joint Seals, Memo to Designers 7-10, Sacramento, CA.
5. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2005a. Bridge Design Aids, Section 1: Abutments, Sacramento, CA.
6. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2005b. Bridge Design Aids, Section 11: Estimating, Sacramento, CA.
7. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2007a. Price Index for Selected Highway Construction Items, Division of Engineering Services, Sacramento, CA.
8. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2007b. Bridge Construction Cost Index, 1970-2006, Division of Engineering Services, Cost Estimates Branch, Sacramento, CA.
9. Cho, S., Gordon, P., Moore, J. E., Richardson, H. W., Shinozuka, M., and Chang, S., 2001. Integrating transportation network and regional economic models to estimate the costs of a large urban earthquake, Journal of Regional Science 41, 39-65. (Pubitemid 34054579)
10. Cornell, C. A., and Krawinkler, H., 2000. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center News, Spring 2000, http://peer.berkeley.edu/news/2000spring/.
11. Enke, D. L., Tirasirichai, C., and Luna, R., 2008. Estimation of earthquake loss due to bridge damage in the St. Louis metropolitan area. II: Indirect losses, Natural Hazards Review 9, 12-19.
12. Fan, Y. Y., Liu, C., Lee, R., and Kiremidjian, A. S., 2009. Highway network retrofit under seismic hazard, Journal of Infrastructure Systems 16, 181-187.
13. Hoppe, E. J., 1999. Guidelines for the Use, Design, and Construction of Bridge Approach Slabs, Tech. Rep. VTRC 00-R4, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA.
14. Ketchum, M., Chang, V., and Shantz, T., 2004. Influence of Design Ground Motion Level on Highway Bridge Costs, Report No. Lifelines 6D01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, University of California, Berkeley.
15. Kiremidjian, A. S., Moore, J. E., Fan, Y. Y., Basoz, N., Yazali, O., and Williams, M., 2006. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Highway Demonstration Project, Report No. 2006/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, University of California, Berkeley.
16. Kramer, S. L., Arduino, P., and Shin, H-S., 2008. Using OpenSees for Performance-Based Evaluation of Bridges on Liquefiable Soils, Report No. 2008/07, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, University of California, Berkeley.
17. Ledezma, C., and Bray, J., 2008. Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Design Evaluation Procedure for Bridge Foundations Undergoing Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading, Report No. 2008/05, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, University of California, Berkeley.
18. Liu, M., and Frangopol, D. M., 2006. Optimizing bridge network maintenance management under uncertainty with conflicting criteria: Life-cycle maintenance, failure, and user costs, Journal of Structural Engineering 132, 1835-1845. (Pubitemid 44592529)
19. Luna, R., Hoffman, D., and Lawrence, W. T., 2008. Estimation of earthquake loss due to bridge damage in the St. Louis metropolitan area. I: Direct losses, Natural Hazards Review 9, 1-11.
20. Mackie, K. R., and Stojadinovic, B., 2007. R-factor parameterized bridge damage fragility curves, Journal of Bridge Engineering 12, 500-510. (Pubitemid 46934998)
21. Mackie, K. R., Wong, J.-M., and Stojadinovic, B., 2008. Integrated probabilistic performancebased evaluation of benchmark reinforced concrete bridges, Report No. 2007/09, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, University of California, Berkeley.
22. Moore, J. E., Cho, S., Fan, Y. Y., and Werner, S. D., 2006. Quantifying Economic Losses from Travel Foregone Following a Large Metropolitan Earthquake, Report 2006/09, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, University of California, Berkeley.
23. Silva, P. F., Megally, S., and Seible, F., 2009. Seismic performance of sacrificial exterior shear keys in bridge abutments, Earthquake Spectra 25, 643-664.
24. Sohn, J., Kim, T. J., Hewings, G. J. D., Lee, J. S., and Jang, S-G., 2003. Retrofit priority of transport network links under an earthquake, Journal of Urban Planning and Development 129, 195-210. (Pubitemid 38025206)
25. Solberg, K. M., Dhakal, R. P., Mander, J. B., and Bradley, B. A., 2008. Computational and rapid expected annual loss estimation methodologies for structures, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 37, 81-101.
26. Tatano, H., and Tsuchiya, S., 2008. A framework for economic loss estimation due to seismic transportation network disruption: A spatial computable general equilibrium approach, Natural Hazards 44, 253-256.
27. Werner, S. D., Taylor, C. E., Cho, S., Lavoie, J.-P., Huyck, C., Eitzel, C., Chung, H., and Eguchi, R. T., 2006. REDARS2: Methodology and Software for Seismic Risk Analysis of Highway Systems, Report No. MCEER-06-SP08, University at Buffalo, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.