In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetic brackets

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 71-77

  Fernandez, Leandro ^a   Canut, José A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; ALUMINUM OXIDE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; POLYCARBONATE; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; STAINLESS STEEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; ENAMEL; EQUIPMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVES; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CATTLE; CERAMICS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; STAINLESS STEEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0033071165     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/21.1.71     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Årtun J, Bergland S 1984 Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch pretreatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 85: 333-40
2. Blalock A, Powers J 1995 Retention capacity of the bracket bases of new esthetic orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 107: 596-603
3. Britton J C, McInnes P, Weinberg R, Ledoux W R, Retief D H 1990 Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98: 348-353
4. Buzzitta J, Hallgren S E, Powers J 1982 Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-bracket systems as studied in vitro. American Journal of Orthodontics 81: 87-92
5. Chaconas S J, Caputo A A, Niu G S-L 1991 Bond strength of ceramic brackets with various bonding systems. Angle Orthodontist 61: 35-42
6. De Pulido L, Powers J 1983 Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-plastic bracket system in vitro. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 124-130
7. Gaffey P G, Major P W, Glover K, Grace M, Koehler J R 1995 Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets. Angle Orthodontist 65: 351-358
8. Ghafari J 1992 Problems associated with ceramic brackets suggest limiting use to selected teeth. Angle Orthodontist 62: 145-152
9. Gwinnett A J 1988 A comparison of shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 93: 346-348
10. Harris A M P, Joseph V P, Rossouw P E 1992 Shear peel bond strengths of esthetic orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102: 215-219
11. Jeiroudi T 1991 Enamel fracture caused by ceramic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 99: 97-99
12. Lopez J I 1980 Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. American Journal of Orthodontics 77: 669-679
13. Maskeroni A, Meyers C, Lorton L 1990 Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of bond strength with polyacrylic acid and phosphoric acid enamel conditioning. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 97: 168-175
14. Matasa C G 1992 Direct bonding metallic brackets: where are they heading? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102: 552-560
15. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T 1986 Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. Journal of Dental Research 62: 1076-1081
16. Newman G V 1965 Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. American Journal of Orthodontics 51: 901-912
17. Newman G V, Sun B C, Ozsoylu S A, Newman R A 1994 Update in bonding brackets: an in vitro survey. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 28: 396-402
18. Ødegaard J, Segman D 1988 Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 94: 201-206
19. Øgaard B, Rølla G 1988 Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization, part 1: lesion development. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 94: 68-73
20. Proffit W R 1992 Contemporary orthodontics. Mosby Year Book, St Louis
21. Sinha P K, Rohrer M D, Nanda R S, Brickman C D 1995 Interlayer formation and its effects on debonding polycristaline alumina orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 108: 455-463
22. Smith H Z, Casko J S 1976 Comparison of orthodontic bracket bond strengths: human vs bovine enamel. Journal of Dental Research 55: 153-167
23. Storm E 1990 Debonding ceramic brackets. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 24: 91-94
24. Swartz M L 1988 Ceramic brackets. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 22: 82-88
25. Trimpeneers L M, Verbeeck R M H, Dermaut L R, Moors M G 1996 Comparative shear bond strength of some orthodontic bonding resins to enamel. European Journal of Orthodontics 18: 89-95
26. Viazis A, Cavanaugh G, Bevis R 1990 Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98: 214-221
27. Viazis A D, Nakajima H, Kleven J S 1993 Shear bond strengths of three new ceramic brackets. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 70: 539-542
28. Viazis A, De Long R, Bevis R R, Douglas W H, Speidel M 1989 Enamel surface abrasion from ceramic orthodontic brackets: a special case report. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 96: 514-518
29. Winchester L J 1991 Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. European Journal of Orthodontics 13: 293-301
30. Zachrisson B U 1994 Bonding in orthodontics. In: Graber T M, Vanarsdal R L (eds.) Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. Mosby Year Book, St Louis, pp. 542-626