Hemodynamic stress response to reinforced endotracheal tube placement using upsher scope and macintosh laryngoscope: A comparative study

Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Aqil, Mansoor ^a  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Hemodynamic stress response; Intubation response; Mcintosh laryngoscope; Upsher scope

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; SEVOFLURANE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; END TIDAL CARBON DIOXIDE TENSION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; EXTERNAL NECK MANIPULATION; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMIC STRESS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGOSCOPE; LARYNGOSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REINFORCED ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE REPLACEMENT; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TREATMENT DURATION;

EID: 84863426964     PISSN: 1682024X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Thong SY, Lim Y. Video and optic laryngoscopy assisted tracheal intubation--the new era. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009;37(2):219-233.
2. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1987;59:295-299.
3. Freye E, Levy JV. Reflex activity caused by laryngoscopy and intubation is obtunded differently by meptazinol, nalbuphine and fentanyl. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007;24(1):53-58.
4. Maassen R, Lee R, van Zundert A, Cooper R. The videolaryngoscope is less traumatic than the classiclaryngoscope for a difficult airway in an obese patient. J Anesthesia 2009;23:445-448.
5. Barak M, Ziser A, Greenberg A, Lischinsky S, Rosenberg B. Hemodynamic and catecholamine response to tracheal intubation: direct laryngoscopy compared with fiberoptic intubation. J Clin Anesth 2003;15(2):132-136.
6. Davis L, Cook-Sather SD, Schreiner MS. Lighted stylet tracheal intubation: A review. Anesth Analg 2000;90:745-756.
7. Chen KY, Tsao SL, Lin SK, Wu HS. Double-lumen endobronchial tube intubation in patients with difficult airways using Trachlight® and a modified technique. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1425-1426.
8. Kahl M, Eberhart LH, Behnke H, Sanger S, Schwarz U, Vogt S, et al. Stress response to tracheal intubation in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery: direct laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal mask airway. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004;18(3):275-280.
9. Kihara S, Brimacombe J, Yaguchi Y, Watanabe S, Taguchi N, Komatsuzaki T. Hemodynamic responses among three tracheal intubation devices in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anesth Analg 2003;96(3):890-895.
10. Fun WL, Lim Y, Teoh WH. Comparison of the Glide Scope video laryngoscope vs. the intubating laryngeal mask for females with normal airways. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007;24(6):486-491.
11. Pott LM, Murray WB. Review of video laryngoscopy and rigid fiberoptic laryngoscopy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008;21(6):750-758.
12. Liem EB. Upsher Laryngoscope Intubation. From University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Simulation, Advanced Learning and Technology, Virtual Anesthesia Machine.2006Web site: http://vam.anest.ufl.edu/airwaydevice/upsher/index.html accessed on01.11.2011.
13. Yang D, Deng XM, Wei LX, Luo MP, Liu JH, Tang GZ, et al. Hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with Upsherscope or Macintosh direct laryngoscope. Zhongguo Yi XueKeXue Yuan XueBao 2007;29(5):656-660.
14. Fridrich P, Frass M, Krenn CG, Weinstabl C, Benumof JL, Krafft P. The Upsher Scope in routine and difficult airway management: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Anesth Analg 1997;85(6):1377-1381.
15. Yeo V, Chung DC, Hin LY. A bougie improves the utility of the Upsher Scope. J Clin Anesth 1999;11(6):471-476.
16. Pearce AC, Shaw S, Macklin S. Evaluation of the Upsher scope. A new rigid fibrescope. Anaesthesia 1996;51(6):561-564.
17. Jakuoenko N, Kopeika U, Mihelsons M, Nagobade D, Putniòa AV, Pavârs A. Comparison of stress response performing endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy, fibreoptic intubation and intubation by the glidescope laryngoscope. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences 2008;62(4/5):176-181.
18. Zhao SB, Jia NG, Liu KP, Li CH, Zhang YJ, Han L, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with shikani laryngoscope or macintosh direct laryngoscope. Zhongguo Yi XueKeXue Yuan XueBao 2010;32(3):303-309.
19. Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS, Glidescope, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 2009;103(5):761-768.
20. Nishikawa K, Matsuoka H, Saito S. Tracheal intubation with the PENTAX-AWS (airway scope) reduces changes of hemodynamic responses and bispectral index scores compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2009;21(4):292-296.
21. Bucx MJ, Scheck PA, Van Geel RT, Den Ouden AH, Niesing R. Measurement of forces during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1992;47(4):348-351.
22. Teoh WH, Shah MK, Sia AT. Randomised comparison of Pentax Airway Scope and Glidescope for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway anatomy. Anaesthesia 2009;64(10):1125-1129.
23. Khan RM, Maroof M, Jain S, Khan RF, Madhu M. Truview EVO2 v.s Macintosh laryngoscopy: Study of cardiovascular responses and POGO scoring. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 2008;24:311-314.