Knowledge of quality performance measures associated with endoscopy among gastroenterology trainees and the impact of a web-based intervention

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Thompson, Jennifer S ^a   Lebwohl, Benjamin ^a   Syngal, Sapna ^b,c   Kastrinos, Fay ^a  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CECUM; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; WEBCAST;

EID: 84863421796     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.019     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:886-91.
2. AGA Task Force on Quality in Practice: A national overview and implications for GI practice. Gastroenterology 2005;129:361-9.
3. Petersen BT. Demand the Data! Your patients will ask and your practice will need it. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:862-3.
4. Cotton PB, Hawes RH, Barkun A, et al. Excellence in endoscopy: toward practical metrics. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:286-91.
5. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Quality and outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:827-30.
6. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873-85.
7. Lieberman D. A call to action - measuring the quality of colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2588-9.
8. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1296-308.
9. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the U.S. Multi- Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1570-95.
10. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:33-6.
11. Sanchez W, Harewood GC, Petersen BT. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1941-5.
12. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533-41.
13. Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, et al. Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:451-5.
14. Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, et al. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 1997;112:17-23.
15. Atkin W, Rogers P, Cardwell C, et al. Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2004; 126:1247-56.
16. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:856-61.
17. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795-803.
18. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, AGA Institute, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. A journey towards excellence: training future gastroenterologists - The Gastroenterology Core Curriculum, Third Edition. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:921-7.
19. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the U.S. Multi- Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:143-159; quiz 184-5.
20. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:243-8.
21. Hixson LS, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:1769-72.
22. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Inter Med 2004;141:352-9.
23. van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2004;127:41-8.
24. Banerjee S, Shen B, Baron TH, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:791-8.
25. Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al. Guideline on the management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:775-9.
26. Saha S, Roberson E, Richie K, et al. Women's health training in gastroenterology fellowship: a national survey of fellows and program directors. Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:751-60.
27. Oxentenko AS, Vierkant RA, Pardi DS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening perceptions and practices: results from a national survey of gastroenterology, surgery and radiology trainees. J Cancer Ed 2007;22:219-26.
28. Braithwaite D, Emery J, De Lusignan S, et al. Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Pract 2003;20:545-51.