Application of kernel vector space model in power quality comprehensive evaluation

Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 72-76

  Li, Ru Qi ^a   Su, Hao Yi ^a   Qu, Zhen Xu ^a  

^a GUANGXI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Approach degree; Combination weighing; Comprehensive evaluation; Kernel vector space model; Power quality

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; APPROACH DEGREE; COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION; COSINE VALUES; DATA SAMPLE; ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD; HIGH DIMENSIONAL SPACES; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL FEATURE SPACE; INPUT DATAS; KERNEL FUNCTION; KERNEL VECTOR SPACE MODEL; LINE SEGMENT; OBJECTIVE WEIGHT; STANDARD SAMPLES; SYNTHETIC EVALUATION; VECTOR SPACE MODELS; WEIGHING METHOD;

PATTERN RECOGNITION; POWER QUALITY; QUALITY CONTROL; VECTORS; WEIGHING;

VECTOR SPACES;

EID: 84863412658     PISSN: 16743415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. TAO Shun, XIAO Xiang-ning. Infrastructure of the power quality assessment system of power systems[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2010, 25(4): 171-175.
2. JIN Guang-hou, LI Geng-yin, ZHOU Ming. Primary study on power quality market theory[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2004, 28(12): 1-6.
3. JIA Zheng-yuan, ZHAO Liang. Comprehensive evaluation of power quality based on the model of entropy weight and unascertained measure[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2010, 38(15): 33-37.
4. HUANG Jing, MA Hong-zhong, JI Hui. Application of intimate data method in synthetical evaluation about power quality[J]. Relay, 2008, 36(3): 60-63.
5. KANG Shi-wei, PENG Jian-chun, HE Yu-qing. Comprehensive evaluation of power quality based on the integration of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with multi-objective decision-making[J]. Power System Technology, 2009, 33(19): 113-118.
6. HAN Zheng-wei, LIN Jin-guo, SHAO Ru-ping. Application of fuzzy multi-objective decision making theory in synthetical evaluation about power quality[J]. Relay, 2007, 35(10): 33-36.
7. ZHAO Xia, ZHAO Cheng-yong, JIA Xiu-fang, et al. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of power quality based on changeable weight[J]. Power System Technology, 2005, 29(6): 11-16.
8. XIONG Yi-wang, CHENG Hao-zhong, WANG Hai-qun, et al. Synthetic evaluation of power quality based on improved AHP and probability statistics[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2009, 37(13): 48-52.
9. ZHANG Man, LIN Tao, CAO Jian, et al. Application of ideal interval method in power quality synthetic evaluation[J]. Power System Technology, 2009, 33(3): 33-38.
10. LI Guo-dong, LI Geng-yin, YANG Xiao-dong, et al. A comprehensive power quality evaluation model based on radar chart method[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2010, 34(14): 70-74.
11. JIANG Hui, PENG Jian-chun, OU Ya-ping, et al. Power quality unitary quantification and evaluation based on probability and vector algebra[J]. Journal of Hunan University, 2003, 30(1): 66-70.
12. LU Jian, ZHAO Ji-guang, XIANG Qiao-jun, et al. Comprehensive evaluation model for highway maintenance quality[J]. Journal of Southeast University: Natural Science Edition, 2005, 35(5): 810-814.
13. Salton G, Wong A, Yang C S. On the specification of term values in automatic indexing[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1973, 29(4): 351-372.
14. LIU Qing-shan, LU Han-qing, MA Song-de. Improving kernel fisher discriminant analysis for face recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2004, 14(1): 42-48.
15. DING Yue-hua, WEN Gui-hua, GUO Wei-qiang. Patent categorization based on kernel vector space model[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2005, 33(8): 58-61.
16. 2004: 21-22.
17. ZHOU Lin, LI Qiu-hua, ZHANG Feng. Application of genetic projection pursuit interpolation model on power quality synthetic evaluation[J]. Power System Technology, 2007, 31(7): 32-35.