Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of power quality based on changeable weight

Power System Technology

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 11-16

  Zhao, Xia ^a   Zhao, Cheng Yong ^a   Jia, Xiu Fang ^a   Li, Geng Yin ^a  

^a NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process(AHP); Changeable weight; Fuzzy method; Power quality; Power system; Synthetic evaluation; Transmission and distribution

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION; ELECTRIC POWER FACTOR; FUZZY CONTROL; POWER TRANSMISSION;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); CHANGEABLE WEIGHT; FUZZY METHOD; POWER QUALITY; POWER SYSTEMS; SYNTHETIC EVALUATION; TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION;

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS;

EID: 16244368470     PISSN: 10003673     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Jia Qingquan, Song Jiahua, Lan Hua et al. Power quality and fuzzy method evaluation[J]. Power System Technology, 2000, 24(6): 46-49.
2. Cai Liang, Chen Hongkun. Fuzzy studies on power quality-part I: index and evaluation[A]. 10th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power[C]. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2002, 2: 419-423.
3. Tang Huizhi, Peng Jianchun. Research on synthetic and quantificated appraisal index of power quality based on fuzzy theory[J]. Power System Technology, 2003, 27(12): 85-88.
4. Farghal S A, Kandil M S, Elmitwally A. Quantifying electric power quality via fuzzy modeling and analytic hierarchy processing [J]. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2002, 149(1): 44-49.
5. Xiao Jun, Wang Chengshan, Zhou Min. Aniahp-based Madm method in urban power system planning[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2004, 24(4): 50-57.
6. Mccauley-Bell P, Badiru A. Fuzzy modeling and analytic hierarchy processing to quantify risk levels associated with occupational injuries-part I: the development of fuzzy-linguistic risk levels[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy System, 1996, 4(2): 124-131.
7. Mccauley-Bell P, Badiru A. Fuzzy modeling and analytic hierarchy processing to quantify risk levels associated with occupational injuries-part II: the development of fuzzy rule-based model for the prediction of injury[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy System, 1996, 4(2): 132-138.
8. Brooks D I, Dugan R C, Waclawiak M et al. Indices for assessing utility distribution system RMS variation performance[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Delivery, 1998, 13(1): 254-259.
9. Huang Weizhong. Two-step weighting method of criterion and it's application[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2003, 24(2): 168-174.