Fluorescent transgenic zebra danio more vulnerable to predators than wild-type fish

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 140, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1001-1005

  Hill, Jeffrey E ^a   Kapuscinski, Anne R ^b   Pavlowich, Tyler ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DANIO RERIO; GAMBUSIA HOLBROOKI; MICROPTERUS; MICROPTERUS SALMOIDES;

EID: 84863398647     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2011.603980     Document Type: Note

References (36)

1. Anderson, O. 1984. Optimal foraging by largemouth bass in structured environments. Ecology (Washington, D.C.) 65:851-861.
2. Baltz, D. M., and P. B. Moyle. 1993. Invasion resistance to introduced species by a native assemblage of California stream fishes. Ecological Applications 3:246-255.
3. Boschung, H. T. Jr., and R. L. Mayden. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Books, Washington, D.C.
4. Chesson, J. 1983. The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology (Washington, D.C.) 64:1297-1304.
5. Cortemeglia, C., and T. L. Beitinger. 2006a. Projected US distribution of transgenic and wild-type zebra danios, Danio rerio, based on temperature tolerance data. Journal of Thermal Biology 31:422-428.
6. Cortemeglia, C., and T. L. Beitinger. 2006b. Susceptibility of transgenic and wild-type zebra danios, Danio rerio, to predation. Environmental Biology of Fishes 76:93-100.
7. deRivera, C. E., G. M. Ruiz, A. H. Hines, and P. Jivoff. 2005. Biotic resistance to invasion: native predator limits abundance and distribution of an introduced crab. Ecology (Washington, D.C.) 86:3364-3376.
8. Devlin, R. H., L. F. Sundström, J. I. Johnsson, I. A. Fleming, K. R. Hayes, W. O. Ojwang, C. Bambaradeniya, and M. Zakaraia-Ismail. 2007. Assessing ecological effects of transgenic fish prior to entry into nature. Pages 151-187 in A. R. Kapuscinski, K. R. Hayes, S. Li, and G. Dana, editors. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, volume 3: methodologies for transgenic fish. CABI, Oxfordshire, UK.
9. Devlin, R. H., L. F. Sundström, andW. M. Muir. 2006. Interface of biotechnology and ecology for environmental risk assessments of transgenic fish. Trends in Biotechnology 24:89-97.
10. Galat, D. L., and B. Robertson. 1992. Response of endangered Poeciliopsis occidentalis sonoriensis in the Rio Yaqui drainage, Arizona, to introduced Gambusia affinis. Environmental Biology of Fishes 33:249-264.
11. Gong, Z., N. Maclean, R. H. Devlin, R. Martinez, O. Omitogun, and M. P. Estrada. 2007. Gene construct and expression: information relevant for risk assessment and management. Pages 95-111 in A. R. Kapuscinski, K. R. Hayes, S. Li, and G. Dana, editors. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, volume 3: methodologies for transgenic fish. CABI, Oxfordshire, UK.
12. Gong, Z., H. Wan, T. L. Tang, H. Wang, M. Chen, and T. Yan. 2003. Development of transgenic fish for ornamental and bioreactor by strong expression of fluorescent proteins in the skeletal muscle. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 308:58-63.
13. Harvey, B. C., J. L. White, and R. J. Nakamoto. 2004. An emergent multiple predator effect may enhance biotic resistance in a stream fish assemblage. Ecology (Washington, D.C.) 85:127-133.
14. Hayse, J.W., and T. E. Wissing. 1996. Effects of stem density of artificial vegetation on abundance and growth of age-0 bluegills and predation by largemouth bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125:422-433.
15. Hill, J. E., L. G. Nico, C. E. Cichra, and C. R. Gilbert. 2006. Prey vulnerability to peacock cichlids and largemouth bass based on predator gape and prey body depth. Proceedings of the Annual Conference Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 58(2004):47-56.
16. Laha, M., and H. T. Mattingly. 2007. Ex situ evaluation of impacts of invasive mosquitofish on the imperiled Barrens topminnow. Environmental Biology of Fishes 78:1-11.
17. Landeau, L., and J. Terborgh. 1986. Oddity and the 'confusion effect' in predation. Animal Behavior 34:1372-1380.
18. Matter, W. J., and R.W. Mannan. 2005. How do prey persist? Journal ofWildlife Management 69:1315-1320.
19. Meffe, G. K. 1985. Predation and species replacement inAmerican southwestern fishes: a case study. Southwest Naturalist 30:173-187.
20. Meffe, G. K., D. A. Hendrickson, W. L. Minckley, and J. N. Rinne. 1983. Factors resulting in decline of the endangered Sonoran topminnow Poeciliopsis occidentalis (Atheriniformes: Poeciliidae) in the United States. Biological Conservation 25:135-159.
21. Mesa, M. G., T. P. Poe, D. M. Gadomski, and J. H. Petersen. 1994. Are all prey created equal? A review and synthesis of differential predation on prey in substandard condition. Journal of Fish Biology 45(Supplement A):81-96.
22. Mills, M. D., R. B. Rader, and M. C. Belk. 2004. Complex interactions between native and invasive fish: the simultaneous effects of multiple negative interactions. Oecologia (Heidelberg) 141:713-721.
23. Muir, W. M., and R. D. Howard. 2002. Assessment of possible ecological risks and hazards of transgenic fishwith implications for other sexually reproducing organisms. Transgenic Research 11:101-104.
24. Nam, Y. K., N. Maclean, C. Fu, T. J. Pandian, and M. R. R. Eguia. 2007. Development of transgenic fish: scientific background. Pages 61-94 in A. R. Kapuscinski, K. R. Hayes, S. Li, and G. Dana, editors. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, volume 3: methodologies for transgenic fish. CABI, Oxfordshire, UK.
25. NRC (National Research Council). 2008. Genetically engineered organisms, wildlife and habitat: a workshop summary. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
26. O'Brien, W. J. 1979. The predator-prey interaction of planktivorous fish and zooplankton. American Scientist 67:572-581.
27. Osenberg, C. W., and G. G. Mittelbach. 1989. The effects of body size on the predator-prey interaction between pumpkinseed sunfish and gastropods. Ecological Monographs 59:405-432.
28. Savino, J. F., and R. A. Stein. 1982. Predator-prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 111:255-266.
29. Schoener, T.W. 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. American Naturalist 122:240-285.
30. Snekser, J. L., S. P. McRobert, C. E. Murphy, and E. D. Clotfelter. 2006. Aggregation behavior in wildtype and transgenic zebrafish. Ethology 112:181-187.
31. Spence, R., M. K. Fatema, M. Reichard, K. A. Huq, M. A. Wahab, Z. F. Ahmed, and C. Smith. 2006. The distribution and habitat preferences of the zebrafish in Bangladesh. Journal of Fish Biology 69:1435-1448.
32. Sundström, L. F., M. L. Lõhmus, J. I. Johnsson, and R. H. Devlin. 2004. Growth hormone transgenic salmon pay for growth potential with increased predation mortality. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 271(Supplement):S350-S352.
33. Taylor, R. C., J. C. Trexler, and W. F. Loftus. 2001. Separating the effects of intra-and interspecific age-structured interactions in an experimental fish assemblage. Oecologia (Heidelberg) 127:143-152.
34. Thompson, K. A. 2008. Native mosquitofish as biotic resistance to invasion: predation on two nonindigenous poeciliids. Master's thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville.
35. Trexler, J. C., W. F. Loftus, and S. Perry. 2005. Disturbance frequency and community structure in a twenty-five year intervention study. Oecologia (Heidelberg) 145:140-152.
36. USGS(U.S. Geological Survey). 2004. Nonindigenous aquatic species database. USGS, Gainesville, Florida. Available: nas. er. usgs. gov. (June 2010).