An emergent multiple predator effect may enhance biotic resistance in a stream fish assemblage

Ecology

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 127-133

  Harvey, Bret C ^a   White, Jason L ^a   Nakamoto, Rodney J ^a  

^a PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Biotic resistance; Cottidae; Cover; Cyprinidae; Emergent multiple predator effects; Introduced species; Laboratory stream; Predation risk; Stream fish

Indexed keywords

CYPRINID; ICHTHYOFAUNA; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PREDATION RISK; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; STREAM;

ANGUILLIFORMES; COTTIDAE; COTTUS ALEUTICUS; COTTUS ASPER; CYPRINIDAE; CYPRINIFORMES; PISCES; PTYCHOCHEILUS GRANDIS; RHINICHTHYS OSCULUS;

EID: 1342311351     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/03-3018     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baltz, D. M., and P. B. Moyle. 1993. Invasion resistance to introduced species by a native assemblage of California stream fishes. Ecological Applications 3:246-255.
2. Baltz, D. M., P. B. Moyle, and N. J. Knight. 1982. Competitive interactions between benthic stream fishes, riffle sculpin, Cottus gulosus, and speckled dace, Rhinichthys osculus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 39:1502-1511.
3. Brown, L. R., S. A. Matern, and P. B. Moyle. 1995. Comparative ecology of prickly sculpins, Cottus asper, and coastrange sculpin, C. aleuticus, in the Eel River, California. Environmental Biology of Fishes 42:329-343.
4. Brown, L. R., and P. B. Moyle. 1997. Invading species in the Eel River, California: successes, failures, and relationships with resident species. Environmental Biology of Fishes 49:271-291.
5. Bryan, S. D., A. T. Robinson, and M. G. Sweetser. 2002. Behavioral responses of a small native fish to multiple introduced predators. Environmental Biology of Fishes 63:49-56.
6. Byers, J. E. 2002. Physical habitat attribute mediates biotic resistance to non-indigenous species invasion. Oecologia 130:146-156.
7. Eklöv, P., and T. VanKooten. 2001. Facilitation among piscivorous predators: effects of prey habitat use. Ecology 82:2486-2494.
8. Lawton, J. H. 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177-192.
9. Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10:689-710.
10. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
11. Moyle, P. B., and T. Light. 1996a. Biological invasions of fresh water: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biological Conservation 78:149-161.
12. Moyle, P. B., and T. Light. 1996b. Fish invasions in California: do abiotic factors determine success? Ecology 77:1666-1670.
13. Rahel, F. J., and R. A. Stein. 1988. Complex predator-prey interactions and predator intimidation among crayfish, piscivorous fish, and small benthic fish. Oecologia 75:94-98.
14. Reusch, T. B. H. 1998. Native predators contribute to invasion resistance to the non-indigenous bivalve Musculista senhousia in southern California, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 170:159-168.
15. Ricciardi, A. 2001. Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an "invasional meltdown" occurring in the Great Lakes? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:2513-2525.
16. Ricciardi, A., and J. B. Rasmussen. 1998. Predicting the identity and impact of future biological invaders: a priority for aquatic resource management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1759-1765.
17. Robinson, J. V., and G. A. Wellborn. 1988. Ecological resistance to the invasion of a freshwater clam, Corbicula fluminea: fish predation effects. Oecologia 77:445-452.
18. Sakai, A. K., F. W. Allendorf, J. S. Holt, D. M. Lodge, J. Molofsky, K. A. With, S. Baughman, R. J. Cabin, J. E. Cohen, N. C. Ellstrand, D. E. McCauley, P. O'Neil, I. M. Parker, J. N. Thompson, and S. G. Weller. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:305-332.
19. Shea, K., and P. Chesson. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:170-176.
20. Sih, A., G. Englund, and D. Wooster. 1998. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:350-355.
21. Simberloff, D., and B. Von Holle. 1999. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1:21-32.
22. Soluk, D. A., and N. C. Collins. 1988. Synergistic interactions between fishes and stoneflies: facilitation and interference among stream predators. Oikos 52:94-100.
23. White, J. L., and B. C. Harvey. 1999. Habitat separation of prickly sculpin, Cottus asper, and coastrange sculpin, Cottus aleuticus, in the mainstem Smith River, northwestern California. Copeia 1999:371-375.
24. White, J. L., and B. C. Harvey. 2001. Effects of an introduced piscivorous fish on native benthic fishes in a coastal river. Freshwater Biology 46:987-995.