An apparent-motion confound causes the negative exogenous cuing effect at SOAs with larger numbers of target locations

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 125, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 61-70

  Chen, Peii ^a   Mordkoff, J Toby ^b  

^a KESSLER FOUNDATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84863398311     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.125.1.0061     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bernstein, E., Fisicaro, S. A., & Fox, J. A. (1976). Metacontrast suppression and criterion content: A discriminant function analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 20(3), 198-204. doi:10.3758/BF03198601
2. Chen, P., Moore, C., & Mordkoff, J. T. (2008). On the spatial metric of short-SOA costs of exogenous cuing. American Journal of Psychology, 121, 229-240.
3. Chen, P., & Mordkoff, J. T. (2007). Contingent capture at a very short SOA: Evidence against rapid disengagement. Visual Cognition, 15(6), 637-646.
4. Enns, J. T. (2004). Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking. Vision Research, 44(12), 1321-1331.
5. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030-1044.
6. Gawryszewski, L. G., Carreiro, L. R. R., & Magalhaes, F. V. (2005). Early and late inhibitions elicited by a peripheral visual cue on manual response to a visual target: Are they based on Cartesian coordinates? Psicologica, 26(1), 121-137.
7. Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321-329.
8. Helmholtz, H. L. F. (1924). Treatise on physiological optics (J. P. C. Southhall, Trans.). Washington, DC: Optical Society of America. (Original work published 1866)
9. Hopfinger, J. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2001). Tracking the influence of reflexive attention on sensory and cognitive processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1(1), 56-65.
10. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Dover.
11. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. L. A. Baddeley (Ed.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Kahneman, D. (1968). Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychological Bulletin, 70(6), 404-425. doi:10.1037/h0026731
13. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 138-147.
14. Kolers, P. A., & Pomerantz, J. R. (1971). Figural change in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87(1), 99-108.
15. Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(4), 1057-1074.
16. Maruff, P., Yucel, M., Danckert, J., Stuart, G., & Currie, J. (1999). Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets. Neuropsychologia, 37(6), 731-744.
17. McAuliffe, J., & Pratt, J. (2005). The role of temporal and spatial factors in the covert orienting of visual attention tasks. Psychological Research: Psychologische Forschung, 69(4), 285-291.
18. Mordkoff, J. T., Halterman, R., & Chen, P. (2008). Why does the effect of short-SOA exogenous cuing on simple RT depend on the number of display locations? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 819-824.
19. Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(2), 520-538.
20. Muller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual-attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315-330.
21. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, J. D. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bonwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(3), 211-228.
23. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(2), 160-174.
24. Pratt, J., Hillis, J., & Gold, J. M. (2001). The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 489-495.
25. Pratt, J., & McAuliffe, J. (2001). The effects of onsets and offsets on visual attention. Psychological Research: Psychologische Forschung, 65(3), 185-191.
26. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
27. Samuel, A. G., & Kat, D. (2003). Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 897-906.
28. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(5), 1639-1656.
29. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49(1), 83-90.
30. Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance: XVIII. Control of cognitive performance (pp. 105-124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press