Motivation and collaborative behavior: An exploratory analysis

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices, CSCL 2009 Community Events Proceedings - 9th International Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2009, Pages 59-61

  Howley, Iris ^a   Chaudhuri, Sourish ^a   Kumar, Rohit ^a   Rosé, Carolyn Penstein ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE BEHAVIOR; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS;

STUDENTS;

MOTIVATION;

EID: 84863395339     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The selfdetermination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3 & 4), 325-346.
2. Gweon, G., Rosé,C. P., Albright, E., Cui, Y. (2007). Evaluating the Effect of Feedback from a CSCL Problem Solving Environment on Learning, Interaction, and Perceived Interdependence, Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning
3. Järvelä, S, Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Niemivirta, M., & Lehtinen, E. (1996). The interaction of students' motivational orientation and cognitive processes in CSILE-based learning projects. A paper to be presented at the symposium under the title: Computer-support for collaborative learning: advancements and challenges. The 7th Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, August 26-30, 1997, Athens, Greece.
4. Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (1997). Developing culture of inquiry in computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. Hall, N. Myake, & N. Enyedy (Ed.), Proceedings of CSCL '97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Newman, R. S. (1990). Children's help-seeking in the classroom: The role of motivational factors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 71-80.
6. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342.
7. Stahl, G. (2006). Analyzing and designing the group cognitive experience. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS).
8. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Zuniga, S. (2002). Short circuits or super conductors? Effects of group composition on high-achieving students' science assessment performance. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 943-989. (Pubitemid 36263743)