Sodium metabisulfite as a contact allergen - An example of a rare chemical mechanism for protein modification

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 123-127

  Roberts, David W ^a   Basketter, David ^b   Kimber, Ian ^c   White, Jonathan ^d   McFadden, John ^d   White, Ian R ^d  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b DABMEB CONSULTANCY LTD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

allergic contact dermatitis; reaction mechanism; sodium metabisulfite

Indexed keywords

ANILINE; CYANIDE; ELECTROPHILE; IODIDE; NUCLEOPHILE; SODIUM METABISULFITE; SULFITE; SULFITE DI ANION; THIOCYANATE; THIOPHENOLATE; THIOSULFATE; THIOUREA; TRIPHENYL PHOSPHINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ELECTROPHILICITY; HUMAN; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; REACTION ANALYSIS; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN MANIFESTATION; SKIN SENSITIZATION;

ALLERGENS; BRONCHOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HUMANS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; SKIN; SULFITES;

EID: 84863393895     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02038.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Madan V, Walker S L, Beck M H., Sodium metabisulfite allergy is common but is it relevant? Contact Dermatitis 2007: 57: 173-176. (Pubitemid 47228516)
2. Harrison D A, Smith A G., Concomitant sensitivity to sodium metabisulfite and clobetasone butyrate in Trimovate cream. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 310. (Pubitemid 34753742)
3. Sánchez-Pérez J, Abajo P, Cõrdoba S, García-Díez A., Allergic contact dermatitis from sodium metabisulfite in an antihemorrhoidal cream. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 176-177. (Pubitemid 30102940)
4. Lee A, Nixon R., Contact dermatitis from sodium metabisulfite in a baker. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 127-128. (Pubitemid 32063038)
5. Vena G A, Foti C, Angelini G., Sulfite contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 172-175.
6. Seitz C S, Bröcker E B, Trautmann A., Eyelid dermatitis due to sodium metabisulfite. Contact Dermatitis 2006: 55: 249-250. (Pubitemid 44350952)
7. Aalto-Korte K, Suuronen K, Alanko K., Sodium metabisulfite-a contact allergen? Contact Dermatitis 2009: 60: 115-117.
8. Malik M M, Hegarty M A, Bourke J F., Sodium metabisulfite-a marker for cosmetic allergy? Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56: 241-242. (Pubitemid 46365238)
9. Huang P Y, Chu C Y., Allergic contact dermatitis due to sodium metabisulfite in a bleaching cream. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56: 123-124.
10. Madan V, Beck M H., Sodium metabisulfite-a contact allergen? Contact Dermatitis 2009: 61: 58.
11. Sasseville D, El-Helou T., Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from sodium metabisulfite. Contact Dermatitis 2009: 61: 244-245.
12. Aptula A O, Roberts D W., Mechanistic applicability domains for non-animal based toxicological endpoints. General principles and application to reactive toxicity. Chem Res Toxicol 2006: 19: 1097-1105. (Pubitemid 44384841)
13. Roberts D W, Aptula A O, Patlewicz G., Electrophilic chemistry related to skin sensitization. Reaction mechanistic applicability domain classification for a published data set of 106 chemicals tested in the mouse local lymph node assay. Chem Res Toxicol 2007: 20: 44-60. (Pubitemid 46220154)
14. Roberts D W, Patlewicz G, Kern P S et al., Mechanistic applicability domain classification of a local lymph node assay dataset for skin sensitization. Chem Res Toxicol 2007: 20: 1019-1030. (Pubitemid 47204815)
15. Skold M, Börje A, Harambasic E, Karlberg A-T., Contact allergens formed on air exposure of linalool. Identification and quantification of primary and secondary oxidation products and the effect on skin sensitization. Chem Res Toxicol 2004: 17: 1697-1705. (Pubitemid 39665563)
16. Karlberg A-T, Bergström M, Börje A, Luthman K, Nilsson J., Allergic contact dermatitis. Formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers. Chem Res Toxicol 2008: 21: 53-69. (Pubitemid 351219708)
17. Aptula A O, Enoch S J, Roberts D W., Chemical mechanisms for skin sensitization by aromatic compounds with hydroxy and amino groups. Chem Res Toxicol 2009: 22: 1541- 1547.
18. Bjerrum J, Schwarzenbach G, Sillen L G., Stability Constants: London, Chemical Society, 1958.
19. Oliphant T, Mitra A, Wilkinson M., Contact allergy to sodium sulfite and its relationship to sodium metabisulfite. Contact Dermatitis 2012: 66: 128-130.
20. Sumi D., Biological effects of and responses to exposure to electrophilic environmental chemicals. J Health Sci 2008: 54: 267-272. (Pubitemid 351798584)
21. Schneider J F, Westley J., Metabolic interrelations of sulfur in proteins, thiosulfate, and cystine. J Biol Chem 1969: 244: 5735-6744.
22. Williams A., Free Energy Relationships in Organic and Bio-Organic Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2003.
23. Isaacs N., Physical Organic Chemistry, 2nd edition: Harlow, Longman, 1995.
24. Kligman A M., The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III. The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. J Invest Dermatol 1966: 47: 393-409.
25. Uter W, Stropp G, Schnuch A, Lessmann H., Aniline-a 'historical' contact allergen? Current data from the IVDK and review of the literature. Ann Occup Hyg 2007: 51: 219-226. (Pubitemid 46415209)
26. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R., Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by thiourea compounds. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 242-248. (Pubitemid 24311534)
27. Liippo J, Ackermann L, Hasan T, Laukkanen A, Rantanen T, Lammintausta K., Sensitization to thiourea derivatives among Finnish patients with suspected contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2010: 63: 37-41.
28. Nishioka K, Takahata H, Ishida T., Contact allergy to sodium thiosulfate and sodium tetrathionate. Environ Dermatol 2001: 8: 131-134.
29. Cameli N, Bardazzi F, Morelli R, Tosti A., Contact dermatitis from rubidium iodide in eyedrops. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 23: 377-378.
30. Gerberick G F, Ryan C A, Kern P S, Schlatter H, Dearman R J, Kimber I, Patlewicz G, Basketter D A., Compilation of historical local lymph node assay data for the evaluation of skin sensitization alternatives. Dermatitis 2005: 16: 157-202. (Pubitemid 43053764)
31. Nakamura A, Momma J, Sekiguchi H et al., A new protocol and criteria for quantitative determination of sensitization potencies of chemicals by guinea pig maximization test. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 72-85.
32. Dearman R J, Smith S, Basketter D A, Kimber I., Classification of chemical allergens according to cytokine secretion profiles of murine lymph node cells. J Appl Toxicol 1997: 17: 53-62. (Pubitemid 27091398)
33. Nassif A S, Le Coz C J, Collet E., A rare nail polish allergen: phthalic anhydride, trimellitic anhydride and glycols copolymer. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56: 172-173 (Pubitemid 46232972)
34. Gach J E, Stone N M, Finch T M., A series of four cases of allergic contact dermatitis to phthalic anhydride/trimellitic anhydride/glycols copolymer in nail varnish. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 53: 63-64 (Pubitemid 40977229)
35. Moffitt D L, Sansom J E., Allergic contact dermatitis from phthalic anhydride/trimellitic anhydride/glycols copolymer in nail varnish. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 236 (Pubitemid 34761679)
36. Hopkins J E, Naisbitt D J, Kitteringham N R, Dearman R J, Kimber I, Park B K., Selective haptenation of cellular or extracellular protein by chemical allergens: association with cytokine polarization. Chem Res Toxicol 2005: 18: 375-381. (Pubitemid 40256259)