Source-language features and maximum correlation training for machine translation evaluation

NAACL HLT 2007 - Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 41-48

  Liu, Ding ^a   Gildea, Daniel ^a  

^a University of Rochester   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION METRICS; HUMAN JUDGMENTS; LINEAR FEATURE; MACHINE TRANSLATION EVALUATIONS; MAXIMUM CORRELATIONS; METHOD OF LEARNING; MT EVALUATIONS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84863386769     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie. 2005. Meteor: An automatic metric for mt evaluation with improved correlation with human judegments. In Proceedings of the ACL-04 workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
2. John Blatz, Erin Fitzgerald, George Foster, Simona Gandrabur, Cyril Goutte, Alex Kulesza, Alberto Sanchis, and Nicola Ueffing. 2003. Confidence estimation for machine translation. Technical report, Center for Language and Speech Processing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. Summer Workshop Final Report.
3. G. Doddington. 2002. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In In HLT 2002, Human Language Technology Conference, San Diego, CA.
4. Alex Kulesza and Stuart M. Shieber. 2004. A learning approach to improving sentence-level MT evaluation. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation (TMI), Baltimore, MD, October.
5. Chin-Yew Lin and Franz Josef Och. 2004. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using longest common subsequence and skip-bigram statistics. In Proceedings of the 42th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-04), Barcelona, Spain.
6. Lucian Vlad Lita, Monica Rogati, and Alon Lavie. 2005. Blanc: Learning evaluation metrics for mt. Vancouver.
7. Ding Liu and Daniel Gildea. 2005. Syntactic features for evaluation of machine translation. In ACL 2005 Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization.
8. Ding Liu and Daniel Gildea. 2006. Stochastic iterative alignment for machine translation evaluation. Sydney.
9. Franz Josef Och. 2003. Minimum error rate training for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL-03.
10. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL-02, Philadelphia, PA.