Uniform hazard versus uniform risk bases for performance-based earthquake engineering of light-frame wood construction

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1199-1217

  Li, Yue ^a   Yin, Yuejun ^a   Ellingwood, Bruce R ^b   Bulleit, William M ^a  

^a Michigan Technological University   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Buildings; Collapse; Earthquakes; Fragility; Limit states; Performance based engineering; Reliability; Structural engineering; Wood structures

Indexed keywords

APARTMENT HOUSES; CIVIL ENGINEERING; DESIGN; EARTHQUAKES; MODEL STRUCTURES; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; WOOD; WOODEN BUILDINGS;

COLLAPSE; FRAGILITY; LIMIT STATE; PERFORMANCE-BASED ENGINEERING; STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; WOOD STRUCTURES;

WOODEN CONSTRUCTION;

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; COLLAPSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; WOOD;

BUILDINGS; CIVIL ENGINEERING; COLLAPSE; EARTH MOVEMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; WOOD;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 77952549953     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.989     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures (ASCE standard 7-05). ASCE: Reston, VA, 2005.
2. Federal Emergency Management Agency. NEHRP recommended provisions and commentary for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA 450, Washington, DC, 2003.
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC). Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings. NBS Special Publication No. 510, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, 1978.
4. United States Geological Survey. Seismic Design Applications: Design Values for Buildings Version 5.0.9. Available from: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/design/ [28 July 2009].
5. Luco N. Risk-targeted approach to selecting return periods for design maps. Proceedings of the 3rd ATC-35/USGS National Earthquake Ground-Motion Mapping Workshop, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, 2006.
6. van de Lindt J, Li Y, Bulleit W, Gupta R, Morris P. The next step for AF&PA/ASCE 16: performance-based design of wood structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2009; 135(6):611-618.
7. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 356), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2000.
8. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). ASCE/SEI Standard 41-06 Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. ASCE: Reston, VA, 2007.
9. NAHB Research Center, Inc. Residential Structural Design Guide: 2000 Edition, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research, National Association of Home Builders Housing Affordability Through Design Efficiency Program, Washington, DC, 2000.
10. American Forest & Paper Association. Wood Frame Construction Manual (WFCM): Design of Wood Frame Buildings for High Wind Snow and Seismic Loadings, American Wood Council and International Code Council, 2001.
11. Folz B, Filiatrault A. CASHEW-version 1.0, a computer program for cyclic analysis of wood shear walls. No. SSRP-2000/10, Structural System Research Project, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 2000.
12. Filiatrault A, Fischer D, Folz B, Uang CM. Seismic testing of two-story wood frame house: influence of wall finish materials. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2002; 128(10):1337-1345.
13. Dolan JD, Heine CP. Sequential phased displacement cyclic tests of wood-frame shear walls with various openings and base restraint configurations. VPI&SU Report No.TE-1997-002, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1997.
14. Folz B, Filiatrault A. Seismic analysis of wood-frame structures. I: model formulation. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2004; 130(9):1353-1360.
15. NAHB Research Center. Manufactured of Housing Shear Wall Tests Using ASTM Method E72 and E564, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1990.
16. Ellingwood BR, Rosowsky DV, Pang W. Performance of light-frame wood residential construction subjected to earthquakes in regions of moderate seismicity. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2008; 134(8):1353-1363.
17. The SAC Steel Project. Suites of earthquake ground motions for analysis of steel moment frame structures. Available from: http://nisee.berkeley.edu/data/strongmotion/sacsteel/groundmotions.html [21 July 2008].
18. Wen YK, Wu CL. Uniform hazard ground motions for mid-America cities. Earthquake Spectra 2001; 17(2): 359-384.
19. Ibarra L. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 2003.
20. Haselton CB, Deierlein GG. Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete frame buildings. Technical Report No. 156, Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Stanford University, 2007.
21. Folz B. SAWS-Seismic Analysis of Wood frame Structures, v1.0, University Of California, San Diego, CA, 2001.
22. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. Probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2002; 128(4): 526-533.
23. Li Y, Ellingwood BR. Reliability of wood-frame residential construction subjected to earthquakes. Structural Safety 2007; 29(4):294-307.
24. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell AC. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3):491-514.
25. Zareian F, Krawinkler H. Assessment of probability and design for collapse safety. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(13):1901-1914.
26. Ellingwood BR, Celik OC, Kinali K. Fragility assessment of building structural systems in mid-America. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(13):1935-1952.
27. Shinozuka M, Feng NQ, Lee J, Naganuma T. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2000; 126(12):1224-1231.
28. Applied Technology Council (ATC). ATC-63 Project: quantification of building system performance and response parameters. Available from: http://www.atcouncil.org/atc63.shtml [10 October 2008].
29. Christovasilis IP, Filiatrault A, Constantinou MC, Wanitkorkul A. Incremental dynamic analysis of wood frame buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2009; 38(4):477-496.
30. Luco N, Ellingwood BR, Hamburger RO, Hooper JD, Kimball JF, Kircher CA. Risk-targeted versus current seismic design maps for the conterminous United States. SEAOC 2007 Convention Proceedings, Olympic Valley, CA, 2007.
31. Ellingwood BR, Kinali K. Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment. Structural Safety 2009; 31(2):179-187.
32. Baker JW, Cornell CA. A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34(10):1193-1217.
33. Ellingwood BR, MacGregor JG, Galambos TV, Cornell CA. Probability-based load criteria: load factors and load combinations. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1982; 108(1):978-997.
34. Goulet CA, Haselton CB, Mitrani-Reiser J, Beck JL, Deierlein GG, Porter KA, Stewart JP. Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced concrete frame building from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(13):1973-1997.