Nanofibers prepared by needleless electrospinning technology as scaffolds for wound healing

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 931-941

  Dubský, Michal ^a,b   Kubinová, Šárka ^a   Širc, Jakub ^c   Voska, Luděk ^b   Zajíček, Robert ^d   Zajícová, Alena ^e   Lesný, Petr ^a   Jirkovská, Alexandra ^b   Michálek, Jiří ^c,f   Munzarová, Marcela ^g   Holáň, Vladimír ^e   Syková, Eva ^a,f  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Czech Republic)

^c INSTITUTE OF MACROMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY   (Czech Republic)

^d CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^e INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Czech Republic)

^f CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^g Elmarco Ltd   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL TRANSFER; ELECTROSPUNS; EXPERIMENTAL MODELS; HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN DERMAL FIBROBLASTS; IN-VITRO; KERATINOCYTES; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MYOFIBROBLASTS; PCL NANOFIBERS; SKIN REGENERATION; THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND HEALING;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; NANOFIBERS; TISSUE;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

GELATIN NANOFIBER; NANOFIBER; POLY EPSILON CAPROLACTONE NANOFIBER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DENSITY; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSPINNING; EPITHELIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; GRANULATION TISSUE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; KERATINOCYTE; MALE; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MYOFIBROBLAST; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SKIN FIBROBLAST; SKIN INJURY; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; HUMANS; NANOFIBERS; WOUND HEALING;

RATTUS;

EID: 84863307526     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-012-4577-7     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Khan AS, et al. Preparation and characterization of a novel bioactive restorative composite based on covalently coupled polyurethane- nanohydroxyapatite fibres. Acta Biomater. 2008;4(5): 1275-87.
2. Lei J, et al. Ag/AgCl coated polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membranes: synthesis and photocatalytic properties. React Funct Polym. 2011;71(11):1071-6.
3. Xing X, Wang Y, Li B. Nanofibers drawing and nanodevices assembly in poly(trimethylene terephtalate). Optics Express. 2008;16:10815-22.
4. Niece KL, et al. Self-assembly combining two bioactive peptideamphiphile molecules into nanofibers by electrostatic attraction. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:7146-7. (Pubitemid 36798942)
5. Huang ZM, et al. A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63:2223-53.
6. Martins A, Reis RL. Electrospinning: processing technique for tissue engineering scaffolding. Int Mater Rev. 2008;53:257-74.
7. Thompson CJ, et al. Effects of parameters on nanofiber diameter determined from electrospinning model. Polymer. 2007;48: 6913-22. (Pubitemid 47615070)
8. Wang HS, Fu GD, Li XS. Functional polymeric nanofibers from electrospinning. Recent Pat Nanotechnol. 2009;3(1):21-31.
9. Ahmad Z, et al. Deposition of nano-hydroxyapatite particles utilising direct and transitional electrohydrodynamic processes. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19(9):3093-104.
10. Lukas D, Sarkar A, Pokorny P. Self-organization of jets in electrospinning from free liquid surface: a generalized approach. J Appl Phys. 2008;103(8):084309.
11. Vasita R, Katti DS. Nanofibers and their applications in tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed. 2006;1(1):15-30.
12. Kubinova S, Sykova E. Nanotechnologies in regenerative medicine. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19(3):144-56.
13. Khang D, et al. Nanotechnology for regenerative medicine. Biomed Microdevices. 2010;12(4):575-87.
14. Kumbar SG, et al. Polymeric nanofibers as novel carriers for the delivery of therapeutic molecules. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2006;6(9-10):2591-607. (Pubitemid 44579933)
15. Chandrasekaran AR, et al. Fabrication of a nanofibrous scaffold with improved bioactivity for culture of human dermal fibroblasts for skin regeneration. Biomed Mater. 2011;6(1):015001.
16. Jayakumar R, et al. Novel chitin and chitosan nanofibers in biomedical applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28(1):142-50.
17. Park CJ, et al. Accelerated wound closure of pressure ulcers in aged mice by chitosan scaffolds with and without bFGF. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(6):1926-36.
18. Kang YO, et al. Chitosan-coated poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibers for wound dressings. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;92(2):568-76.
19. Rho KS, et al. Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers: effects on the behavior of normal human keratinocytes and early-stage wound healing. Biomaterials. 2006;27(8):1452-61. (Pubitemid 41739571)
20. Liu X, et al. In vivo wound healing and antibacterial performances of electrospun nanofibre membranes. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;94(2):499-508.
21. Kurpinski KT, et al. The effect of fiber alignment and heparin coating on cell infiltration into nanofibrous PLLA scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2010;31(13):3536-42.
22. Kim SE, et al. Electrospun gelatin/polyurethane blended nanofibers for wound healing. Biomed Mater. 2009;4(4):044106.
23. Babaeijandaghi F, et al. Accelerated epidermal regeneration and improved dermal reconstruction achieved by polyethersulfone nanofibers. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;16(11):3527-36.
24. Katti DS, et al. Bioresorbable nanofiber-based systems for wound healing and drug delivery: optimization of fabrication parameters. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;70(2):286-96. (Pubitemid 39006907)
25. Choi JS, Leong KW, Yoo HS. In vivo wound healing of diabetic ulcers using electrospun nanofibers immobilized with human epidermal growth factor (EGF). Biomaterials. 2008;29(5): 587-96. (Pubitemid 350100803)
26. Kong H, Jang J. Antibacterial properties of novel poly(methyl methacrylate) nanofiber containing silver nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2008;24(5):2051-6. (Pubitemid 351500965)
27. Jirsak O. et al. U.S. patent No. WO 205024101. 2005.
28. Han I, et al. Effect of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) nanofiber matrices cocultured with hair follicular epithelial and dermal cells for biological wound dressing. Artif Organs. 2007;31(11):801-8. (Pubitemid 350131988)
29. Boateng JS, et al. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97(8):2892-923.
30. Kumar MS, et al. Triphala incorporated collagen sponge-a smart biomaterial for infected dermal wound healing. J Surg Res. 2010;158(1):162-70.
31. Ahmad Z, Stride E, Edirisinghe M. Novel preparation of transdermal drug-delivery patches and functional wound healing materials. J Drug Target. 2009;17(9):724-9.
32. Anthony ET, et al. The development of novel dermal matrices for cutaneous wound repair. Drug Discov Today Ther Strateg. 2006;3(1):81-6.
33. Dini V, et al. Cutaneous tissue engineering and lower extremity wounds (part 2). Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2006;5(1):27-34. (Pubitemid 43260784)
34. Marston WA, et al. The efficacy and safety of Dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a prospective randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(6):1701-5. (Pubitemid 36929107)
35. Mostow EN et al. Effectiveness of an extracellular matrix graft (OASIS Wound Matrix) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg Off Publ, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter. 2005;41(5): 837-43. (Pubitemid 40693807)
36. Turnovcova K, et al. Properties and growth of human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells cultivated in different media. Cytotherapy. 2009;11(7):874-85.
37. Matouskova E, et al. Human allogeneic keratinocytes cultured on acellular xenodermis: the use in healing of burns and other skin defects. Biomed Mater Eng. 2006;16(4 Suppl):S63-71. (Pubitemid 43953677)
38. Lukas D, Sarkar A, Pokorny P. Self-organization of jets in electrospinning from free liquid surface: a generalized approach. J Appl Phys. 2008;103:084309.
39. Nakagawa H, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells successfully improve skin-substitute wound healing. Br J Dermatol. 2005; 153(1):29-36. (Pubitemid 41044524)
40. Sasaki M, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells are recruited into wounded skin and contribute to wound repair by transdifferentiation into multiple skin cell type. J Immunol. 2008;180(4): 2581-7.
41. Luo G, et al. Promotion of cutaneous wound healing by local application of mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood. Wound Repair Regen. 2010;18(5):506-13.
42. Chen L, et al. Paracrine factors of mesenchymal stem cells recruit macrophages and endothelial lineage cells and enhance wound healing. PLoS One. 2008;3(4):e1886.
43. Zajicova A, et al. Treatment of ocular surface injuries by limbal and mesenchymal stem cells growing on nanofiber scaffolds. Cell Transplant. 2010;19(10):1281-90.
44. Werner S, Krieg T, Smola H. Keratinocyte-fibroblast interactions in wound healing. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127(5):998-1008. (Pubitemid 46625161)
45. Darby IA, Hewitson TD. Fibroblast differentiation in wound healing and fibrosis. Int Rev Cytol. 2007;257:143-79. (Pubitemid 46186476)
46. Zhong SP, Zhang YZ, Lim CT. Tissue scaffolds for skin wound healing and dermal reconstruction. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2010;2(5):510-25.
47. Huang S, et al. Functional bilayered skin substitute constructed by tissue-engineered extracellular matrix and microsphereincorporated gelatin hydrogel for wound repair. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(9):2617-24.
48. Zeugolis DI, et al. Electro-spinning of pure collagen nanofibres - just an expensive way to make gelatin? Biomaterials. 2008;29(15):2293-305.