Making an impact: Research, publications, and bibliometrics in the BJGP

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 62, Issue 596, 2012, Pages 157-159

  Jones, Roger ^a   Green, Emilie ^b   Hull, Catharine ^a   Niesner, Erika ^a   Schofield, Peter ^c  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRICS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SHORT SURVEY;

BIBLIOMETRICS; GREAT BRITAIN; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84863283478     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X630214     Document Type: Short Survey

References (12)

1. Mendis K, van Weel C, del Mar C, Jones R. Citation, citation, citation. Br J Gen Pract 2010; 577: 561-562.
2. Thomson Reuters. Journal Citation Reports. http://thomsonreuters.com/ products-services /science/science-products/az/ journal-citation-reports/ (accessed 25 Jan 2012).
3. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam. Tools to measure journal impact. http://www.eur.nl/researchmatters/getting-pu blished-and-measuring-impact/tools- to-me asure-journal-impact/ (accessed 25 Jan 2012).
4. SJR - SCImago Journal and Country Rank. Embedding function provides customised and current information into your website about over 14 000 scientific journals. http://www.scimagojr.com/news.php?id=23 (accessed 25 Jan 2012).
5. Thulesius H. Assessing research impact with Google Scholar: Themost cited articles in the journal 2008-2010. Scand J Prim Health Care 2011; 29(4): 193-195.
6. Gray DP. Use of downloads fromthe Journal. Br J Gen Pract 2009; 563: 401-402.
7. Hobbs R. Should we ditch impact factors? BMJ 2007; 334: 569.
8. Haines A, Jones R. Implementing findings of research. BMJ 1994; 308: 1488.
9. Armstrong D, Reyburn H, Jones R. A study of general practitioners' reasons for changing their prescribing behaviour. BMJ 1996; 312: 949.
10. Glanville J, Kendrick T, McNally R, et al. Research output in primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis. BMJ 2011; 342: d1028.
11. Parliament. Science and Technology Committee - eighth report: peer review in scientific publications. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm 201012/cmselect/cmsctech/856/85602.htm (accessed 25 Jan 2012).
12. van Weel C. Biomedical sciencematters for people - so its impact should be better assessed. Lancet 2002; 360: 1034-1035. Reference 13, which is REF 2014. Panel criteria and working methods:http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/ pubs/2012/01-12/01-12-1.pdf