Social visualization and negotiation: Effects of feedback configuration and status

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1081-1090

  Nowak, Michael ^a   Kim, Juho ^b   Kim, Nam Wook ^c   Nass, Clifford ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

arousal; cscw; feedback systems.; negotiation; social visualization

Indexed keywords

AROUSAL; CSCW; FEEDBACK SYSTEMS.; NEGOTIATION; SOCIAL VISUALIZATION;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84863281500     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2145204.2145365     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., and Bates, D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59 (2008), 390-412.
2. Bates, D.M. and Maechler, M. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. http://cran.rproject. org/web/packages/lme4/index.html.
3. Bergstrom, T. and Karahalios, K. Seeing more: Visualizing audio cues. Proc. INTERACT 2007, Springer (2007), 29-42.
4. Boersma, P. and Weenink, D. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org.
5. Curhan, J.R., Elfenbein, H.A., and Xu, H. What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91, 3 (2006), 493-512. (Pubitemid 44373504)
6. Curhan, J.R. and Pentland, A. Thin slices of negotiation: Predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (2007), 802-811.
7. Duval, S. and Wicklund, R. A Theory of Objective Self- Awareness, Academic Press, New York, 1972.
8. DiMicco, J.M., Lakshmipathy, V., and Fiore, A.T. Conductive Chat: Instant messaging with a skin conductivity channel. Proc. CSCW 2002, ACM Press (2002).
9. DiMicco, J.M., Pandolfo, A., and Bender, W. Influencing group participation with a shared display. Proc. CSCW 2004, ACM Press (2004), 614-623.
10. DiMicco, J.M., Hollenbach, K.J., Pandolfo, A., and Bender, W. The impact of increased awareness while face-to-face. Human-Computer Interaction 27 (2007), 47-96. (Pubitemid 47009108)
11. Erickson, T. Designing visualizations of social activity: six claims. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 846-847.
12. Hall, E.T. The Hidden Dimension, Anchor Books, New York, 1966.
13. Hart S.G. and Staveland, L.E. Development of a NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock, P.S. and Meshkati N. (eds.), Human Mental Workload. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.
14. Iwasaki, K., Miyaki, T., and Rekimoto, J. AffectPhone: A handset device to present user's emotional state with warmth/coolness. In Kim, J. and Karjalainen, P. (eds.), Bio-Inspired Human-Machine Interfaces and Healthcare Applications. INSTICC Press, Valencia, Spain (2010), 83-88.
15. Janssen, J.H., Bailenson, J.N., Ijsselstein, W.A., and Westerink, J.H.D.M. Intimate heartbeats: Opportunities for affective communication technology. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 1, 2 (2010), 72-80.
16. Kim, T., Chang, A., Holland, L., and Pentland, A. Meeting Mediator: Enhancing group collaboration using sociometric feedback. Proc. CSCW 2008, ACM Press (2008), 457-466.
17. Leshed, G., Perez, D., Hancock, J.H., Cosley, D., Birnholtz, J., Lee, S., McLeod, P.L., and Gay, G. Visualizing real-time language-based feedback on teamwork behavior in computer-mediated groups. Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 537-546.
18. McGrath, J.E. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
19. Mehrabian, A. Nonverbal Communication, Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, 1972.
20. Murray, I.R. and Arnott, J.L. Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: A review of the literature on human vocal emotion. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93, 2 (1993), 1097-1108. (Pubitemid 23059837)
21. Nass, C. and Mason, L. On the study of technology and task: A variable-based approach. In J. Fulk and C. Steinfeld (eds.), Organizations and communication technology. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.
22. Pentland, A. Honest Signals: How They Shape Our World, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008.
23. Pinkley, R.L., Neale, M.A., and Bennett, R.J. The impact of alternatives to settlement in dyadic negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, (1994), 97-116.
24. Rickenberg, R. and Reeves, B. The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 49-56.
25. Scheflen, A.E. The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry 27 (1964), 316-331.
26. Shaw, M. Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1976.
27. Stuhlmacher, A.F. and Walters, A.E. Gender differences in negotiation outcome: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 52 (1999), 653-677.
28. Van Meggelen, J., Madsen, L., and Smith, J. Asterisk. http://www.asterisk.org.
29. Wang, H., Prendinger, H., and Igarashi, T. Communicating emotions in online chat using physiological sensors and animated text. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1171-1174.
30. Wicklund, R.A. Objective self-awareness. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 8, Academic Press, New York, 1975.
31. Zajonc, R.B. Social facilitation, Science 149 (1965), 269-274.