Scheduling problems with position dependent job processing times: Computational complexity results

Annals of Operations Research

Volumn 196, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 491-516

  Rudek, Radosław ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS   (Poland)

Author keywords

Aging effect; Computational complexity; Learning effect; Scheduling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863208309     PISSN: 02545330     EISSN: 15729338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1098-1     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adler, P. S., & Clark, K. B. (1991). Behind the learning curve: a sketch of the learning process. Management Science, 37, 267-281.
2. Arimoto, S., Kawamura, S., & Miyazaki, F. (1984). Bettering operations of robots by learning. Journal of Robotic Systems, 1, 123-140.
3. Bachman, A., & Janiak, A. (2004). Scheduling jobs with position dependent processing times. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 257-264.
4. Biskup, D. (1999). Single-machine scheduling with learning considerations. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 173-178.
5. Biskup, D. (2008). A state-of-the-art review on scheduling with learning effects. European Journal of Operational Research, 188, 315-329.
6. Buşoniu, L., Babuška, R., & De Schutter, B. (2008). A comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part C, Applications and Reviews, 38, 156-172.
7. Carlson, J. G., & Rowe, R. G. (1976). How much does forgetting cost? Industrial Engineering, 8, 40-47.
8. Cheng, T. C. E., Ding, Q., & Lin, B. M. T. (2004). A concise survey of scheduling with time-dependent processing times. European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 1-13.
9. Cheng, T. C. E., Lee, W.-C., & Wu, C.-C. (2010). Single-machine scheduling with deteriorating functions for job processing times. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34, 4171-4178.
10. Cheng, T. C. E., & Wang, G. (2000). Single machine scheduling with learning effect considerations. Annals of Operations Research, 98, 273-290.
11. Cheng, T. C. E., Wu, C.-C., & Lee, W.-C. (2008). Some scheduling problems with deteriorating jobs and learning effects. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 54, 972-982.
12. Cochran, E. B. (1960). New concepts of the learning curve. The Journal of Industrial Engineering, 11, 317-327.
13. Dababneh, A. J., Swanson, N., & Shell, R. L. (2001). Impact of added rest breaks on the productivity and well being of workers. Ergonomics, 44, 164-174.
14. Eilon, S. (1964). On a mechanistic approach to fatigue and rest periods. International Journal of Production Research, 3, 327-332.
15. Garey, M. R., & Johnson, D. S. (1979). Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. San Francisco: Freeman.
16. Gawiejnowicz, S. (1996). A note on scheduling on a single processor with speed dependent on a number of executed jobs. Information Processing Letters, 57, 297-300.
17. Gawiejnowicz, S. (2008). Time-dependent scheduling. Berlin: Springer.
18. Graham, R. L., Lawler, E. L., Lenstra, J. K., & RinnooyKan, A. H. G. (1979). Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 5, 287-326.
19. Holzer, H. P., & Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (1986). The learning curve: a management accounting tool. Westport: Quorum Books.
20. Jaber, Y. M., & Bonney, M. (1999). The economic manufacture/order quantity (EMQ/EOQ) and the learning curve: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Production Economics, 59, 93-102.
21. Janiak, A., & Rudek, R. (2010). Scheduling jobs under an aging effect. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 1041-1048.
22. Janiak, A., & Rudek, R. (2011). A note on the learning effect in multi-agent optimization. Expert Systems With Applications, 38, 5974-5980.
23. Keachie, E. C., & Fontana, R. J. (1966). Production lot sizing under a learning effect. Management Science, 13, 102-108.
24. Kerzner, H. (1998). Project management: a system approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. New York: Wiley.
25. Kuo, W.-H., & Yang, D.-L. (2008). Minimizing the makespan in a single-machine scheduling problem with the cyclic process of an aging effect. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 416-420.
26. Lee, W.-C., & Lai, P.-J. (2011). Scheduling problems with general effects of deterioration and learning. Information Sciences, 181, 1164-1170.
27. Lee, W.-C., Wu, C.-C., & Hsu, P.-H. (2010). A single-machine learning effect scheduling problem with release times. Omega, 38, 3-11.
28. Leung, J. Y.-T., Li, H., & Pinedo, M. (2008). Scheduling orders on either dedicated or flexible machines in parallel to minimize total weighted completion time. Annals of Operations Research, 159, 107-123.
29. Li, C.-L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (1994). An economic production quantity model with learning and forgetting considerations. Production and Operations Management, 3, 118-132.
30. Lien, T. K., & Rasch, F. O. (2001). Hybrid automatic-manual assembly systems. Annals of the CIRP, 50, 21-24.
31. Mandich, N. V. (2003). Overview of surface preparation of metals prior to finishing: Part 2. Metal Finishing, 101, 33-58.
32. Moore, J. M. (1968). An n jobs, one machine sequencing algorithm for minimizing the number of late jobs. Management Science, 15, 102-109.
33. Mosheiov, G. (2001). Parallel machine scheduling with a learning effect. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52, 1-5.
34. Roberts, P. (1983). A theory of the learning process. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34, 71-79.
35. Rudek, A., & Rudek, R. (2011). A note on optimization in deteriorating systems using scheduling problems with the aging effect and resource allocation models. Computers & Mathematics With Applications, 62, 1870-1878.
36. Shabtay, D., & Steiner, G. (2008). The single-machine earliness-tardiness scheduling problem with due date assignment and resource-dependent processing times. Annals of Operations Research, 159, 25-40.
37. Steiner, G., & Zhang, R. (2011). Minimizing the weighted number of tardy jobs with due date assignment and capacity-constrained deliveries. Annals of Operations Research, 191, 171-181.
38. Stanford, M., & Lister, P. M. (2004). Investigation into the relationship between tool-wear and cutting environments when turning EN32 steel. Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, 56, 114-121.
39. Sturm, L. B. J. M. (1970). A simple optimality proof of Moore's sequencing algorithm. Management Science, 17, 116-118.
40. Wang, J.-B., & Wang, M.-Z. (2011). Worst-case behavior of simple sequencing rules in flow shop scheduling with general position-dependent learning effects. Annals of Operations Research. 191, 155-169.
41. Webb, G. K. (1994). Integrated circuit (IC) pricing. High Technology Management Research, 5, 247-260.
42. Whiteson, S., & Stone, P. (2004). Adaptive job routing and scheduling. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 17, 855-869.
43. Wright, T. P. (1936). Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 3, 122-128.
44. Wu, C.-C., Lee, W.-C., & Chen, T. (2007). Heuristic algorithms for solving the maximum lateness scheduling problem with learning considerations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 52, 124-132.
45. Xu, K., Feng, Z., & Ke, L. (2010). A branch and bound algorithm for scheduling jobs with controllable processing times on a single machine to meet due dates. Annals of Operations Research, 181, 303-324.
46. Yang, D.-L., & Kuo, W.-H. (2009). Single-machine scheduling with both deterioration and learning effects. Annals of Operations Research, 172, 315-327.
47. Yang, S.-J., & Yang, D.-L. (2010). Minimizing the makespan on single-machine scheduling with aging effect and variable maintenance activities. Omega, 38, 528-533.
48. Yang, S.-J., Yang, D.-L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2010). Single-machine due-window assignment and scheduling with job-dependent aging effects and deteriorating maintenance. Computers & Operations Research, 37, 1510-1514.
49. Yelle, L. E. (1979). The learning curve: historical review and comprehensive study. Decision Sciences, 10, 302-328.
50. Zhang, X., Yan, G., Huang, W., & Tang, G. (2011). Single-machine scheduling problems with time and position dependent processing times. Annals of Operations Research, 186, 345-356.