Variation in physical and mechanical properties of hemp stalk fibers along height of stem

Industrial Crops and Products

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 344-348

  Li, Xiaoping ^a,b   Wang, Siqun ^b   Du, Guanben ^a   Wu, Zhangkang ^a   Meng, Yujie ^b  

^a SOUTHWEST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell wall; Hemp stalk; Mechanical properties; Nanoindentation; Physical properties

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE CROPS; CELL WALLS; FIBER CELLS; HEMP STALKS; INDUSTRIAL HEMP; LOW DENSITY; MICRO-FIBRILS; PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; RELATIVE DEGREE OF CRYSTALLINITY; SOFT MATERIAL;

BIOMECHANICS; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; FIBERS; HEMP; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NANOINDENTATION; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; SOFTWOODS;

HEMP FIBERS;

CRYSTALLINITY; CYTOLOGY; MECHANICAL PROPERTY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSICAL ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; STEM;

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; FIBERS; HEMP; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; SOFTWOODS;

CANNABIS; CANNABIS SATIVA;

EID: 84863207024     PISSN: 09266690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.05.043     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Barbera L., Pelach M.A., Perez I., Puig J., Mutje P. Upgrading of hemp core for papermaking purposes by means of organosolv process. Industrial Crops and Products 2011, 34(1):563-571.
2. Bhushan B., Williams V.S., Shack R.V. In situ nanoindentation hardness apparatus for mechanical characterization of extremely thin-films. Journal of Tribology-Transactions of the ASME 1988, 110(3):563-571.
3. Cave I.D. Theory of X-ray measurement of microfibril angle in wood. Forest Products Journal 1966, 16(10):37-42.
4. Crowley J.G. The Performance of Cannabis sativa (Hemp) as a Fibre Source for Medium Density Fibre Board (MDF) 2011, Irish Agriculture And Food Development Authority (Teagasc), Carlow, Ireland, pp. 1-11.
5. David S.A., Vitek J.M., Keiser J.R., Oliver W.C. Nanoindentation microhardness study of low-temperature ferrite decomposition in austenitic stainless-steel welds. Welding Journal 1987, 6(8):S235-S240.
6. Duval A., Bourmaud A., Augier L., Baley C. Influence of the sampling area of the stem on the mechanical properties of hemp fibers. Materials Letters 2011, 65(4):797-800.
7. Gindl W., Schoberl T., Jeronimidis G. The interphase in phenol-formaldehyde and polymeric methylene diphenyl-di-isocyanate glue lines in wood. International Journal of Adhesion And Adhesives 2004, 24(4):279-286.
8. Gindl W., Gupta H.S., Schoberl T., Lichtenegger H.C., Fratzl P. Mechanical properties of spruce wood cell walls by nanoindentation. Applied Physics A-Materials Science & Processing 2004, 79(8):2069-2073.
9. House J.D., Neufeld J., Leson G. Evaluating the quality of protein from hemp seed (Cannabis sativa L.) products through the use of the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score method. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2010, 58(22):11801-11807.
10. Karus M., Vogt D. European hemp industry: cultivation, processing and product lines. Euphytica 2004, 140(1-2):7-12.
11. Konnerth J., Gierlinger N., Keckes J., Gindl W. Actual versus apparent within cell wall variability of nanoindentation results from wood cell walls related to cellulose microfibril angle. Journal of Materials Science 2009, 44(16):4399-4406.
12. Kovacs I., Rab A., Rusznak I., Annus S. Hemp (Cannabis sativa) as a possible raw-material for the paper-industry. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology 1992, 26(5):627-635.
13. Kreuger E., Prade T., Escobar F., Svensson S.E., Englund J.E., Bjornsson L. Anaerobic digestion of industrial hemp-effect of harvest time on methane energy yield per hectare. Biomass & Bioenergy 2011, 35(2):893-900.
14. Lasserre J.P., Mason E.G., Watt M.S., Moore J.R. Influence of initial planting spacing and genotype on microfibril angle, wood density, fibre properties and modulus of elasticity in Pinus radiata D. Don corewood. Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 58(9):1924-1931.
15. Lindstrom H., Evans J.W., Verrill S.P. Influence of cambial age and growth conditions on microfibril angle in young Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Holzforschung 1998, 52(6):573-581.
16. Li X. The Mechanism and Manufacturing Techniques of Castor Stalk Based Board 2010, China Forestry Press, Beijing, pp. 23-36.
17. Li X., Chen C. The micro structure and fiber configuration of industry hemp stalks. Journal of Cellulose Science and Technology 2010, 18(3):28-33.
18. Liao C., Deng Y., Wang S., Meng Y., Wang X., Wang N. Microstructure and mechanical properties of silvergrass fibers cell evaluated by nanoindentation. Wood and Fiber Science 2012, 44(17):63-70.
19. Mohan D., Pittman C.U., Steele P.H. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy & Fuels 2006, 20(3):848-889.
20. Meng, Y., Wang, S., Cai, Z., Young, T.M., Du, G., Li, Y., 2012. A novel sample preparation method to avoid embedding medium influence during nanoindentation. Applied Physics A, (In print).
21. Nikvash N., Kraft R., Kharazipour A., Euring M. Comparative properties of bagasse, canola and hemp particle boards. European Journal of Wood Products 2010, 68:323-327.
22. Oliver W.C., Pharr G.M. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. Journal of Materials Research 1992, 7:1564-1583.
23. Page D.H., Elhosseiny F., Winkler K., Lancaster A.P.S. Elastic-modulus of single wood pulp fibers. Tappi 1977, 60(4):114-117.
24. Segal L., Creely J., Martin A., Conrad C. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal 1959, 29(10):786-794.
25. Soljacic I., Cunko R. Croatian textiles throughout history. Tekstil 1994, 43(11):584-602.
26. Tang X., Ma L. Physical properties and chemical composition of a hemp core. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College 2010, 27(5):794-798.
27. Theis M., Grohe B. Biodegradable lightweight construction boards based on tannin/hexamine bonded hemp shaves. Holz Als Roh-und Werkstoff 2002, 60(4):291-296.
28. Thomsen A.B., Thygesen A., Bohn V., Nielsen K.V., Pallesen B., Jorgensen M.S. Effects of chemical-physical pre-treatment processes on hemp fibres for reinforcement of composites and for textiles. Industrial Crops and Products 2006, 24(2):113-118.
29. Tze W.T.Y., Wang S., Rials T.G., Pharr G.M., Kelley S.S. Nanoindentation of wood cell walls: continuous stiffness and hardness measurements. Composites Part A-Applied Science and Manufacturing 2007, 38(3):945-953.
30. Vignon M.R., Dupeyre D., GarciaJaldon C. Morphological characterization of steam-exploded hemp fibers and their utilization in polypropylene-based composites. Bioresource Technology 1996, 58(2):203-215.
31. Wimmer R., Lucas B.N., Tsui T.Y., Oliver W.C. Longitudinal hardness and Young's modulus of spruce tracheid secondary walls using nanoindentation technique. Wood Science and Technology 1997, 31(2):131-141.
32. Wu Y., Wang S., Zhou D., Xing C., Zhang Y. Use of nanoindentation and Silviscan to determine the mechanical properties of 10 hardwood species. Wood and Fiber Science 2009, 41(1):64-73.
33. Wu Y., Wang S., Zhou D., Xing C., Zhang Y., Cai Z. Evaluation of elastic modulus and hardness of crop stalks cell walls by nano-indentation. Bioresource Technology 2010, 101(8):2867-2871.
34. Xing C., Wang S., Pharr G.M., Groom L.H. Effect off thermo-mechanical refining pressure on the properties of wood fibers as measured by nano-indentation and atomic force microscopy. Holzforschung 2008, 62(2):230-236.
35. Yates T. The use of non-food crops in the UK construction industry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2006, 86(12):1790-1796.
36. Zhang Y., Zhang S., Chui Y., Wan H. Effect of impregnation and in situ polymerization of methacrylates on hardness of sugar maple wood. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2006, 99(4):1674-1683.
37. Zhang J., Zhang H., Lai K., Hao X., Ma T., Zhang J., Ji Y., Yan Z., Zhou Y., Sun R. Structure and Properties of China Hemp Fiber 2009, Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, pp. 34-55.