Qualitative and quantitative analysis of women's perceptions of transvaginal surgery

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 998-1004

  Bingener, Juliane ^a   Sloan, Jeff A ^a   Ghosh, Karthik ^a   McConico, Andrea ^a   Mariani, Andrea ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Cholecystectomy appendectomy; Natural orifice surgery; Qualitative methods; Transvaginal surgery; Tubal ligation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; APPENDECTOMY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAIN; PARITY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SCAR FORMATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INFECTION; TRANSVAGINAL SURGERY; UTERINE TUBE LIGATION; ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; UTERINE TUBE STERILIZATION; VAGINA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; APPENDECTOMY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NATURAL ORIFICE ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; STERILIZATION, TUBAL; VAGINA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84863196782     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1984-7     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Solomon D, Lentz R, Duffy A, Bell R, Roberts KE (2011) Female sexual function after pure transvaginal appendectomy: a cohort study. Digestive Disease Week 2011, Conference Proceedings, Chicago, I.L.
2. Ott D (1901) Die direkte Beleuchtung der Bauchhoehle, der Harnblase, des Dickdams and des Uterus zu diagnostischen und operativen Zwecken. Rev Med Tcheque (Prague) 2:27-29
3. Federlein M, Borchert D, Muller V, Atas Y, Fritze F, Burghardt J, Elling D, Gellert K (2010) Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 24:2444-2452
4. Gero D, Lukovich P, Hulesch B, Palhazy T, Kecskedi B, Kupcsulik P (2010) Inpatients and specialists' opinions about natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Technol Int 19:79-84
5. Omana JJ, Mistry S, Herron D, Kini S (2010) Perception of NOTES among health care workers and medical students. Surg Innov 17:63-68
6. Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, Horgan S, Talamini M, Chock A (2009) Women's positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1770-1774
7. Strickland AD, Norwood MG, Behnia-Willison F, Olakkengil SA, Hewett PJ (2010) Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a survey of women's views on a new technique. Surg Endosc 24:2424-2431
8. Swanstrom LL, Volckmann E, Hungness E, Soper NJ (2009) Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1519-1525
9. Tsin DA, Castro-Perez R, Davila MR, Davila F (2010) Postoperative patient attitudes and perceptions of transvaginal cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:119-121
10. Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman E (2008) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 67:854-860
11. Volckmann ET, Hungness ES, Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL (2009) Surgeon perceptions of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). J Gastrointest Surg 13:1401-1410
12. Becerra Garcia FC, Romo-Medrano Mora KE (2010) Our perception of "Women's positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery": let the voices be heard, not just counted. Surg Endosc 24:1226-1228
13. Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF (2008) Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Ann Family Med 6:331-339