Our perception of "Women's positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery": Let the voices be heard, not just counted

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1226-1228

  Garcia, Francisco César Becerra ^b   Mora, Karina Elizabeth Romo Medrano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL STATUS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 77955665256     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0750-6     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, Horgan S, Talamini M, Chock A (2009) Women's positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 23(8):1770-1774. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0206-4.
2. Becerra Garcia FC, Misra MC, Bhattacharjee HK, Buess G (2009) Experimental trial of transvaginal cholecystectomy: an ex vivo analysis of the learning process for a novel single-port technique. Surg Endosc 23(10):2242-2249. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0296-z.
3. Lethoux P, Blume S (2000) Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. J Health Politics, Policy Law 25:1083-1120.
4. Weizman D, Cyriac J, Urbach DR (2007) What is meant when a laparoscopic surgical procedure is described as "safe"? Surg Endosc 21:1369-1372.
5. Braun V, Wilkinson S (2001) Sociocultural representations of the vagina. J Reproduct Infant Psychol 19:17-32.