Computational modeling of effects of mechanical shaking on hemodynamics in hollow fibers

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 301-307

  Kim, Jeong Chul ^a,b,c   Garzotto, Francesco ^a,b   Cruz, Dinna N ^a,b   Clementi, Anna ^a,b,d   Nalesso, Federico ^a,b   Kim, Ji Hyun ^e   Kang, Eungtaek ^f   Kim, Hee Chan ^c,g   Ronco, Claudio ^a,b  

^a SAN BORTOLO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b International Renal Research Institute Vicenza (IRRIV)   (Italy)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

^e Korea Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^f Chung Ang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^g Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Concentration polarization; Dialysis adequacy; Hemodiafiltration; Mechanical stress; Membrane fouling; Shaking

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; DIALYSIS; DIALYSIS MEMBRANES; FIBERS; HEMODYNAMICS; MEMBRANE FOULING; ROTATIONAL FLOW; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR STRESS;

CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; DIALYSIS ADEQUACY; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HOLLOW FIBER; MECHANICAL SHAKING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PERFORMANCE; SHAKING; WALL SHEAR STRESS; WALL-SHEAR STRESS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL KIDNEY; BLOOD FLOW; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVALUATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HOLLOW FIBER; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOTION; PRESSURE; ROTATION; SHEAR STRESS; VELOCITY; VORTEX MOTION; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; HYDRODYNAMICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYDRODYNAMICS; KIDNEYS, ARTIFICIAL; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; RENAL DIALYSIS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84863194535     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000094     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Vanholder R, Van Laecke S, Glorieux G. The middle-molecule hypothesis 30 years after: lost and rediscovered in the universe of uremic toxicity? J Nephrol. 2008;21(2):146-160.
2. Morti SM, Zydney AL. Protein-membrane interactions during hemodialysis: effects on solute transport. ASAIO J. 1998;44(4):319-326. Medline. doi:10.1097/00002480-199807000-00016
3. Klinke B, Rockel A, Abdelhamid S, Fiegel P, Walb D. Transmembranous transport and adsorption of beta-2-microglobulin during hemodialysis using polysulfone, polyacrylonitrile, polymethylmethacrylate and cuprammonium rayon membranes. Int J Artif Organs. 1989;12(11):697-702.
4. Huang Z, Gao D, Letteri JJ, Clark WR. Blood-membrane interactions during dialysis. Semin Dial. 2009;22(6):623-628. Medline. doi:10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00658.x
5. Bian R, Yamamoto K, Watanabe Y. The effect of shear rate on controlling the concentration polarization and membrane fouling. Desalination. 2000;131(1-3):225-236. doi:10.1016/ S0011-9164(00)90021-3
6. Jaffrin MY. Dynamic shear-enhanced membrane filtration: a review of rotating disks, rotating membranes and vibrating systems. J Membr Sci. 2008;324(1-2):7-25. doi:10.1016/j. memsci.2008.06.050
7. Abel K, Jeffree MA, Bellhouse BJ, Bellhouse EL, Haworth WS. A practical secondary-flow hemodialyzer. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1981;27:639-643.
8. Kim JC, Garzotto F, Cruz DN, et al. Enhancement of solute removal in a hollow-fiber hemodialyzer by mechanical vibration. Blood Purif. 2011;31(4):227-234. Medline. doi:10.1159/000321073
9. Deshpande NS, Barigou M. Vibrational flow of non-Newtonian fluids. Chem Eng Sci. 2001;56(12):3845-3853. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00059-8
10. Cho YI, Kensey KR. Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel: Part 1: steady flows. Biorheology. 1991;28(3-4):241-262.
11. Ronco C, Orlandini G, Brendolan A, Lupi A, La Greca G. Enhancement of convective transport by internal filtration in a modified experimental hemodialyzer: technical note. Kidney Int. 1998;54(3):979-985. Medline. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00049.x
12. Landis EM, Pappenheimer JF. Exchange of substances through the capillary walls. In: Hamilton WF, ed. Handbook of physiology. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society, 1963; 961-1034.
13. Nevaril CG, Lynch EC, Alfrey CP Jr, Hellums JD. Erythrocyte damage and destruction induced by shearing stress. J Lab Clin Med. 1968;71(5):784-790.
14. Shinzato T, Maeda K. Push/pull hemodiafiltration. Contrib Nephrol. 2007;158:169-176. Medline. doi:10.1159/000107247
15. Schiffl H. High-flux dialyzers, backfiltration, and dialysis fluid quality. Semin Dial. 2011;24(1):1-4. Medline. doi:10.1111/ j.1525-139X.2010.00786.x
16. Krantz WB, Bilodeau RR, Voorhees ME, Elgas RJ. Use of axial membrane vibrations to enhance mass transfer in a hollow tube oxygenator. J Membr Sci. 1997;124(2):283-299. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00245-1
17. Henderson LW. Biophysics of ultrafiltration and hemofiltration. In: Jacobs C, Kjellstrand CM, Koch KM, Winchester JF, eds. Replacement of renal function by dialysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996; 133-145.
18. Ronco C, Ghezzi PM, Brendolan A, Crepaldi C, La Greca G. The haemodialysis system: basic mechanisms of water and solute transport in extracorporeal renal replacement therapies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(Suppl 6):3-9. Medline. doi:10.1093/ndt/13.suppl_6.3
19. Olayiwola B, Walzel P. Effects of in-phase oscillation of retentate and filtrate in crossflow filtration at low Reynolds number. J Membr Sci. 2009;345(1-2):36-46. doi:10.1016/j. memsci.2009.08.022
20. Sutera SP, Mehrjardi MH. Deformation and fragmentation of human red blood cells in turbulent shear flow. Biophys J. 1975;15(1):1-10. Medline. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(75)85787-0
21. Kuakuvi DN, Moulin P, Charbit F. Dean vortices: a comparison of woven versus helical and straight hollow fiber membrane modules. J Membr Sci. 2000;171(1):59-65. doi:10.1016/ S0376-7388(99)00379-8