Choosing peritoneal dialysis reduces the risk of invasive access interventions

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 810-816

  Oliver, Matthew J ^a   Verrelli, Mauro ^b   Zacharias, James M ^b   Blake, Peter G ^c   Garg, Amit X ^c   Johnson, John F ^c   Pandeya, Sanjay ^d   Perl, Jeffery ^f   Kiss, Alex J ^e   Quinn, Robert R ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^d Halton Healthcare ^*  (Canada)

^e SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^f ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

arteriovenous access; chronic kidney disease; end stage renal disease; peritoneal dialysis; prospective study

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIALYSIS CATHETER; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; CATHETERIZATION; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; ONTARIO; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RENAL DIALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84863174474     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr289     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. McCormick BB, Brown PA, Knoll G et al. Use of the embedded peritoneal dialysis catheter: experience and results from a North American Center. Kidney Int Suppl 2006; 103: S38-S43
2. Williams VR, Quinn R, Callery S et al. The impact of treatment modality on infection-related hospitalization rates in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 2010; . [epub ahead of print]
3. Oliver MJ, Garg AX, Blake PG et al. Impact of contraindications, barriers to self-care and support on incident peritoneal dialysis utilization. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 2737-2744
4. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: Update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37 (1 Suppl 1): S137-S181
5. Jindal K, Chan CT, Deziel C et al. Hemodialysis clinical practice guidelines for the Canadian Society of Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17 (3 Suppl 1): S1-S27
6. Dember LM, Beck GJ, Allon M et al. Effect of clopidogrel on early failure of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 299: 2164-2171
7. Lok CE, Allon M, Moist L et al. Risk equation determining unsuccessful cannulation events and failure to maturation in arteriovenous fistulas (REDUCE FTM I). J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17: 3204-3212
8. Beathard GA, Settle SM, Shields MW. Salvage of the nonfunctioning arteriovenous fistula. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 33: 910-916
9. Zamani P, Kaufman J, Kinlay S. Ischemic steal syndrome following arm arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. Vasc Med 2009; 14: 371-376
10. Oliver MJ, McCann RL, Indridason OS et al. Comparison of transposed brachiobasilic fistulas to upper arm grafts and brachiocephalic fistulas. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 1532-1539
11. Schwab SJ, Beathard G. The hemodialysis catheter conundrum: hate living with them, but can't live without them. Kidney Int 1999; 56: 1-17
12. Wu AW, Fink NE, Marsh-Manzi JV et al. Changes in quality of life during hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis treatment: generic and disease specific measures. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 743-753
13. Feldman HI, Kobrin S, Wasserstein A. Hemodialysis vascular access morbidity. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7: 523-535
14. How to report a serious adverse event? www.fda.gov/medwatch/howtoreport/ ucm05387/htm
15. Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley RN et al. Mortality studies comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: what do they tell us? Kidney Int Suppl 2006; 103: S3-S11
16. Dixon BS, Novak L, Fangman J. Hemodialysis vascular access survival: upper-arm native arteriovenous fistula. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: 92-101
17. Povlsen JV, Ivarsen P. How to start the late referred ESRD patient urgently on chronic APD. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21 (Suppl 2): ii56-ii59
18. Lee T, Barker J, Allon M. Comparison of survival of upper arm arteriovenous fistulas and grafts after failed forearm fistula. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 1936-1941
19. Keuter XH, de Smet AA, Kessels AG et al. A randomized multicenter study of the outcome of brachial-basilic arteriovenous fistula and prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop as vascular access for hemodialysis. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 395-401
20. Huijbregts HJ, Bots ML, Wittens CH et al. Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula patency revisited: results of a prospective, multicenter initiative. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 714-719
21. Tessitore N, Mansueto G, Bedogna V et al. A prospective controlled trial on effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty on functioning arteriovenous fistulae survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 1623-1627
22. Miskulin D. Characterizing comorbidity in dialysis patients: principles of measurement and applications in risk adjustment and patient care. Perit Dial Int 2005; 25: 320-332
23. Moist LM, Churchill DN, House AA et al. Regular monitoring of access flow compared with monitoring of venous pressure fails to improve graft survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2645-2653
24. Lumsden AB, MacDonald MJ, Kikeri D et al. Prophylactic balloon angioplasty fails to prolong the patency of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene arteriovenous grafts: results of a prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26: 382-390
25. Crabtree JH, Burchette RJ. Effective use of laparoscopy for longterm peritoneal dialysis access. Am J Surg 2009; 198: 135-141
26. Brum S, Rodrigues A, Rocha S et al. Moncrief-Popovich technique is an advantageous method of peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 3070-3075
27. Oreopoulos DG, Coleman S, Doyle E. Reversing the decreasing peritoneal dialysis (PD) trend in Ontario: a government initiative to increase PD use in Ontario to 30% by 2010. Perit Dial Int 2007; 27: 489-495
28. Stack AG, Murthy BV, Molony DA. Survival differences between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis among "large" ESRD patients in the United States. Kidney Int 2004; 65: 2398-2408
29. Jaar BG, Coresh J, Plantinga LC et al. Comparing the risk for death with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in a national cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 174-183
30. Dagher FJ. The upper arm AV hemoaccess: long term follow-up. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1986; 27: 447-449