Effects of Acoustic Radiation Force on the Binding Efficiency of BR55, a VEGFR2-Specific Ultrasound Contrast Agent

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1460-1469

  Frinking, Peter J A ^a   Tardy, Isabelle ^a   Théraulaz, Martine ^a   Arditi, Marcel ^a   Powers, Jeffry ^b   Pochon, Sibylle ^a   Tranquart, François ^a  

^a Bracco Suisse SA   (Switzerland)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic radiation force; BR55; Targeted contrast agent; Ultrasound molecular imaging; VEGFR2

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC RADIATION FORCE; BR55; TARGETED CONTRAST AGENTS; ULTRASOUND MOLECULAR IMAGING; VEGFR-2;

ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS; ACOUSTIC RADIATORS; ACOUSTIC WAVE PROPAGATION; ACOUSTIC WAVE TRANSMISSION; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; MOLECULAR IMAGING; OPTIMIZATION; TUMORS; ULTRASONICS;

BINDING SITES;

ECHO CONTRAST MEDIUM; VASCULOTROPIN RECEPTOR 2;

ACOUSTIC RADIATION FORCE IMPULSE IMAGING; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANGIOGENESIS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; IN VIVO STUDY; MICROBUBBLE; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; RADIATION DOSE; RAT; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CONTRAST MEDIA; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; HIGH-ENERGY SHOCK WAVES; MALE; MICROBUBBLES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PROTEIN BINDING; RATS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR-2;

EID: 84863102989     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: 1879291X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Becher H., Burns P.N. Handbook of contrast echocardiography: Left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion 2000, Springer Verlag, Frankfurt and New York.
2. Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature 2005, 438:932-936.
3. Dayton P.A., Morgan K.E., Klibanov A.L., Brandenburger G., Nightingale K.R., Ferrara K.W. A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1997, 44:1264-1277.
4. Dayton P.A., Klibanov A., Brandenburger G., Ferrara K. Acoustic radiation force in vivo: A mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999, 25:1195-1201.
5. Dayton P.A., Morgan K.E., Klibanov A., Brandenburger G., Ferrara K.W. Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1999, 46:220-232.
6. de Jong N., Emmer M., Van Wamel A., Versluis M. Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009, 47:861-873.
7. Doinikov A.A., Zhao S., Dayton P.A. Modeling of the acoustic response from contrast agent microbubbles near a rigid wall. Ultrasonics 2009, 49:195-201.
8. ECMUS safety committee tutorial " Diagnostic ultrasound exposure" EFSUMB Newsletter 2003, January.
9. FDA 2008. Information for manufacturers seeking marketing clearance of diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers. Food and Drug Administration, Centre for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
10. Folkman J. Minireview-Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 1992, 267:10931-10934.
11. Fowlkes J.B., Gardner E.A., Ivey J.A., Carson P.L. The role of acoustic radiation force in contrast enhancement techniques using bubble based ultrasound contrast agents. J. Acoust Soc Am 1993, 93:2348.
12. Frinking P.J.A., Bouakaz A., Kirkhorn J., Ten Cate F.J., de Jong N. Ultrasound contrast imaging: Current and new potential methods. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000, 26:965-975.
13. Hettiarachchi K., Talu E., Longo M.L., Dayton P.A., Lee A.P. On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging. Lab Chip 2007, 7:463-468.
14. Hicklin D.J., Ellis L.M. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:1011-1027.
15. Hu Y., Zhang D., Zheng H., Gong X. Chirp excitation technique to enhance microbubble displacement induced by ultrasound radiation force. J Acoust Soc Am 2009, 125:1410-1415.
16. Johnson K., Cianciolo R., Gessner R.C., Dayton P.A. A pilot study to assess markers of renal damage in the rodent kidney after exposure to 7 MHz ultrasound pulse sequences designed to cause microbubble translation and disruption. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012, 38:168-172.
17. Klibanov A.L. Preparation of targeted microbubbles: Ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009, 47:875-882.
18. Kokhuis TJA, Overvelde M, Garbin V, Kooiman K, Naaijkens BA, Juffermans LJM, Versluis M, de Jong N. Detachment of targeted microbubbles under influence of secondary acoustic radiation force. 16th European Symposium Ultrasound Contrast Imaging 2011, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (). http://www.echocontrast.nl.
19. Leighton T.G. The acoustic bubble 1994, Academic Press, New York.
20. Pillai R., Marinelli E.R., Swenson R.E. A flexible method for preparation of peptide homo- and heterodimers functionalized with affinity probes, chelating ligands, and latent conjugating groups. Biopolymers (Peptide Sci) 2006, 84:576-585.
21. Pochon S., Tardy I., Bussat P., Bettinger T., Brochot J., von Wronski M., Passantino L., Schneider M. BR55: A lipopeptide-based VEGFR2-targeted ultrasound contrast agent for molecular imaging of angiogenesis. Invest Radiol 2010, 45:89-95.
22. Rafter P., Phillips P., Vannan M.A. Imaging technologies and techniques. Cardiol Clin 2004, 22:181-197.
23. Rognin N.G., Frinking P., Costa M., Arditi M. In vivo perfusion quantification by contrast ultrasound: Validation of the use of linearized video data vs. raw RF data. Beijing, China. Proc. IEEE Ultrason Symp 2008, 1690-1693.
24. Rychak J.J., Klibanov A.L., Hossack J.A. Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles: In vitro verification. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2005, 52:421-433.
25. Rychak J.J., Klibanov A.L., Ley K.F., Hossack J.A. Enhanced targeting of ultrasound contrast agents using radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007, 33:1132-1139.
26. Schneider M. Characteristics of SonoVue. Echocardiography 1999, 16:743-746.
27. Schneider M., Anantharam B., Arditi M., Bokor D., Broillet A., Bussat P., Fouillet X., Frinking P., Tardy I., Terrettaz J., Senior R., Tranquart F. BR38: A new ultrasound blood pool agent. Invest Radiol 2011, 46:486-494.
28. Shrivastava A., von Wronski M.A., Sato A.K., Dransfield D.T., Sexton D., Bogdan N., Pillai R., Nanjappan P., Song B., Marinelli E., DeOliveira D., Luneau C., Devlin M., Muruganandam A., Abujoub A., Connelly G., Wu Q.L., Conley G., Chang Q., Tweedle M.F., Ladner R.C., Swenson R.E., Nunn A.D. A distinct strategy to generate high-affinity peptide binders to receptor tyrosine kinases. Protein Eng Des Sel 2005, 18:417-424.
29. Talu E., Hettiarachchi K., Powell R.L., Lee A.P., Dayton P.A., Longo M.L. Maintaining monodispersity in a microbubble population formed by flow-focusing. Langmuir 2008, 24:1745-1749.
30. Tardy I., Pochon S., Theraulaz M., Emmel P., Passantino L., Tranquart F., Schneider M. Ultrasound molecular imaging of VEGFR2 in a rat prostate tumor model using BR55. Invest Radiol 2010, 45:573-578.
31. Tortoli P., Michelassi V., Corsi M., Righi D., Takeuchi Y. On the interaction between ultrasound contrast agents during Doppler investigations. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001, 27:1265-1273.
32. Van der Meer S.M., Dollet B., Voormolen M.M., Chin C.T., Bouakaz A., de Jong N., Versluis M., Lohse D. Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am 2007, 121:648-656.
33. Zhao S., Borden M., Bloch S.H., Kruse D., Ferrara K.W., Dayton P.A. Radiation-force assisted targeting facilitates ultrasonic molecular imaging. Mol Imaging 2004, 3:135-148.