Improving patient safety via automated laboratory-based adverse event grading

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 111-115

  Niland, Joyce C ^a   Stiller, Tracey ^a   Neat, Jennifer ^a   Londrc, Adina ^a   Johnson, Dina ^a   Pannoni, Susan ^a  

^a CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; AMYLASE; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE; BICARBONATE; BILIRUBIN; CHOLESTEROL; CREATINE KINASE; CREATININE; HEMOGLOBIN; MAGNESIUM; TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE;

ACCURACY; ADVERSE DRUG REACTION; ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE BLOOD LEVEL; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BICARBONATE BLOOD LEVEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; HYPERCALCEMIA; HYPERKALEMIA; HYPERNATREMIA; HYPERTRIGLYCERIDEMIA; HYPERURICEMIA; HYPOALBUMINEMIA; HYPOCALCEMIA; HYPOKALEMIA; HYPONATREMIA; HYPOPHOSPHATEMIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEUKOCYTE; MAGNESIUM BLOOD LEVEL; NEUTROPHIL; PATIENT SAFETY; PROTEINURIA; THROMBOCYTE;

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; CLINICAL LABORATORY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DRUG TOXICITY; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; PATIENT SAFETY; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84863049158     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000513     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Jenkins J, Hubbard S. History of clinical trials. Semin Oncol Nurs 1991;7:228-34.
2. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191-4.
3. Martin PJ, Antin JH, Weisdorf DJ, et al. Reporting of adverse event data in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation clinical trials involving investigational new drugs or devises: a report from the William Guy Forbeck Foundation 2001 focus meeting on clinical trials in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2002;8:295-302.
4. Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF, et al. Early detection of toxicity and adjustment of ongoing clinical trials: the history and performance of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group s real-time toxicity monitoring program. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:4591-6.
5. Bates DW, Evans RS, Murff H, et al. Detecting adverse events using information technology. JAMIA 2003;10:115-28.
6. Murff HJ, Patel VL, Hripcsak G, et al. Detecting adverse events for patient safety research: a review of current methodologies. J of Biomed Inform 2003;36:131-43.
7. Scharf O, Colevas AD. Adverse event reporting in publications compared with sponsor database for cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3933-8.
8. Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and the evolution of adverse event reporting in oncology. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:5121-7.
9. CTEP. NCI Adverse Event Grading Criteria, CTCAE v3.0. http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcaev3.pdf
10. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:523-30.
11. Corrigan JM, Kohn LT, Donaldson MS, et al. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
12. Berg M. Implementing Information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform 2001;64:143-56.
13. Hersh WR. Medical informatics: improving health care through information. JAMA 2002;288:1955-8.
14. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving patient safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2526-34.
15. Bradshaw K. Computerized Alerting System Warns of Life-Threatening Events. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1986;10:403.
16. Kuperman GJ, Teich JM, Tanasijevic MJ, et al. Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6:512-22.
17. Bates DW, Leape LL. Doing better with critical test results. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Safety 2005;31:66-7.
18. BRIDG. http://bridgmodel.org/
19. UCUM. http://unitsofmeasure.org
20. caBIGR Compatability Guidelines. https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/guidelines_documentation/
21. Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Keeler EB. Costs and benefits of health information technology. Evid Rep Technol Assess 2006;132:1-71.
22. Bates DW, O'Neil AC, Petersen LA, et al. Evaluation of screening criteria for adverse events in medical patients. Med Care 1995;33:452-62.
23. Bates DW, O'Neil AC, Boyle D, et al. Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994;1:404-11.
24. Gandhi TK, Seger DL, Bates DW. Identifying drug safety issues: from research to practice. Int J Qual Health Care 2000;12:69-76.
25. Singh H, Thomas EJ, Sittig DF, et al. Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med 2010;123:238-44.
26. Lee EK, Mejia AF, Senior T, et al. Improving patient safety through medical alert management: an automated decision tool to reduce alert fatigue. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010:417-21.