Pilot study on evaluation of any correlation between MR perfusion (K trans) and diffusion (apparent diffusion coefficient) parameters in brain tumors at 3 tesla

Cancer Imaging

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-6

  Chu, Jian Ping ^a   Mak, Henry Ka Fung ^a   Yau, Kelvin Kai Wing ^a   Zhang, Linda ^a   Tsang, Janice ^a   Chan, Queenie ^a   Leung, Gilberto Ka Kit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient; Blood brain barrier; Brain tumor; Diffusion weighted imaging; Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; Permeability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; GLIOBLASTOMA; GLIOMA; HUMAN; MALE; MENINGIOMA; METASTASIS; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PILOT STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADRENAL CORTEX HORMONES; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER; BODY WATER; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CAPILLARY PERMEABILITY; CARCINOMA; DIFFUSION; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; GLIOBLASTOMA; GLIOMA; HUMANS; ISCHEMIA; MALE; MENINGEAL NEOPLASMS; MENINGIOMA; MIDDLE AGED; PERFUSION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

EID: 84863043940     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14707330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0001     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2007; 14: 97-109. (Pubitemid 47103521)
2. Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB, et al. Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumors: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A: 2474-84.
3. Lacerda S, Law M. Magnetic resonance perfusion and permeability imaging in brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 2009; 19: 527-57. doi:10.1016/j.nic.2009.08.007.
4. Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Brasch RC, Dillon WP. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 891-9. (Pubitemid 30262836)
5. Provenzale JM, Wang GR, Brenner T, Petrella JR, Sorensen AG. Comparison of permeability in high grade and low grade brain tumors using dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 711-16. (Pubitemid 34178155)
6. Law M, Yang S, Babb JS, et al. Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with the glioma grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 746-55. (Pubitemid 38657655)
7. Yang S, Law M, Babb JS, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced with perfusion MRI imaging measurements of endothelial permeability: differentiation between atypical and typical meningiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1554-9. (Pubitemid 37151719)
8. Haris M, Husain N, Singh A, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced derived cerebral blood volume correlates better with leak correction than with no correction for vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular density, and grading of astrocytoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32: 955-65. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e31816200d1.
9. Maia AC, Jr. Malheiros SM, da Rocha AJ, et al. MR cerebral blood volume maps correlated with vascular endothelial growth factor expression and tumor grade in nonenhancing gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 777-83.
10. Zhu XP, Li KL, Kamaly-Asl ID, et al. Quantification of endothelial permeability, leakage space, and blood volume in brain tumors using combine that T1 and T2*contrast enhanced dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 575-85. doi:10.1002/1522-2586(200006)11:6〈575::AID-JMRI2〉3. 0.CO;2-1. (Pubitemid 30350299)
11. Johnson G, Wetzel SG, Cha S, Babb J, Tofts PS. Measuring blood volume and vascular transfer of constant from dynamic, T2*-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 961-8. doi:10.1002/mrm.20049. (Pubitemid 38580608)
12. trans measurements obtained with conventional and first-pass pharmacokinetic models in human gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 527-36. doi:10.1002/jmri.20045.
13. trans, determined with conventional steady-state T1-weighted and first-pass T2*-weighted MR imaging methods in gliomas and meningiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 409-17.
14. Larsson HBW, Courivaud F, Rostrup E, Hansen AE. Measurement of brain perfusion, blood volume, and blood brain barrier permeability, using dynamic contrast enhanced T1 weighted MRI at 3 tesla. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 1270-81. doi:10.1002/mrm.22136.
15. Zhu XP, Li KL, Jackson A. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in cerebral tumors. In: Jackson A, Buckley DL, Parker GJM, editors. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. Berlin: Springer; 2005, p. 130.
16. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 53-60. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199901)9: 1〈53::AID-JMRI7〉3.0.CO;2-2. (Pubitemid 29068231)
17. Guo AC, Cummings TJ, Dash RC, Provenzale JM. Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. Radiology 2002; 224: 177-83. doi:10.1148/radiol.2241010637. (Pubitemid 34680392)
18. Murakami R, Hirai T, Sugahara T, et al. Grading astrocytic tumors by using apparent diffusion coefficient parameters. Radiology 2009; 251: 838-45. doi:10.1148/radiol.2513080899.
19. Kono K, Inoue Y, Nakayama K, et al. The role of diffusion weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1081-8. (Pubitemid 32587420)
20. Server A, Kulle B, Mahlen J, et al. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema. Acta Radiol 2009; 6: 682-9.
21. Hamstra DA, Rehemtulla A, Ross BD. Diffusion on magnetic resonance imaging: a biomarker for treatment response in oncology. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4104-9. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.11.9610. (Pubitemid 47495868)
22. Jenkinson MD, du Plessis DG, Smith TS, Brodbelt AR, Joyce KA, Walker C. Cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient in oligodendroglial tumors characterized by genotype. J Neurooncol 2010; 96: 385-92. doi:10.1007/s11060- 009-9970-9.
23. Mills SJ, Soh C, Rose CJ, et al. Candidate biomarkers of extravascular extracellular space: a direct comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imagingderived measurement of the volume of the extravascular extracellular space in glioblastoma multiforme. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 549-53. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1844.
24. Simonetti AJ, Hoogenraad FG, van Muiswinkel AMC. Automated arterial input function using spatial information and feature space reduction. Proceedings of 2007 Annual Scientific Meeting of International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, abstract number 2820.
25. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusible tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 223-32. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3〈223::AID-JMRI2〉3.0.CO;2-S. (Pubitemid 29463104)
26. Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, Trachtenberg J, Wilson BC, Haider MA. Prostate cancer detection with multiparametric MRI: logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 327-34. doi:10.1002/jmri.21824.
27. Yankeelov TE, Lepage M, Chakravarthy A, et al. Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.006. (Pubitemid 46048940)
28. Wesseling P, Ruiter DJ, Burger PC. Angiogenesis in brain tumors; pathobiological and clinical aspects. J Neurooncol 1997; 32: 253-65. doi:10.1023/A:1005746320099. (Pubitemid 27077976)
29. Ross BD, Galban CJ, Rehemtulla A, et al. Diffusion and MR imaging in adult neoplasia. In: Gillard JH, Waldman AD, Barker PB, editors. Clinical MR neuroimaging physiological and functional techniques. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010, p. 324.
30. Riad S, Holodny AI, Mukherji SK. Diffusion imaging in brain tumors and treatment response. In: Holodny AI, editor. Functional neuroimaging: a clinical approach. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2008, p. 204.
31. Abo-Ramadan U, Durukan A, Pitkonen M, et al. Post-ischemic leakiness of the blood-brain barrier: a quantitative and systematic assessment by Patlak plots. Exp Neurol 2009; 219: 328-33. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.06.002.
32. Sadeghi N, Camby I, Goldman S, et al. Effect of hydrophilic components of the extracellular matrix on quantifiable diffusion-weighted imaging of human gliomas: preliminary results of correlating apparent diffusion coefficient values and hyaluronan expression level. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 235-41. (Pubitemid 36741494)