2D analytical solution of ideal perforation flow

SPE Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 631-652

  Li, B ^a   Sun, D ^a   Gladkikh, M ^a   Wu, J ^a  

^a BAKER HUGHES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BESSEL FUNCTIONS; FLOW RATE;

ANISOTROPIC PERMEABILITY; COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE; CORE FLOW EFFICIENCIES; GOVERNING EQUATIONS; MASS CONSERVATION EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL SIMULATORS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS (PDE); PRESSURE AND VELOCITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;

EID: 84863004998     PISSN: 1086055X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2118/128021-PA     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ansah, J., Proett, M.A., and Soliman, M.Y. 2002. Advances in Well Completion Design: A New 3D Finite-Element Wellbore Inflow Model for Optimizing Performance of Perforated Completions. Paper SPE 73760 presented at the International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 20-21 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/73760-MS.
2. ANSYS Fluent 12.0 User's Guide. 2001. Canonsburg, Pennsylvania: ANSYS, Inc.
3. API RP 19B, Recommended Practices for Evaluation of Well Perforators. 2000. Washington, DC: API.
4. API RP 43, Final Report Investigation of Core Orientation And Perforation Debris on Standard Perforation Flow Tests, fifth edition. 1991. Washington, DC: API.
5. Bear, J. 1988. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, reprint edition, 128, 235. Mineola, NY: Dover Books on Physics and Chemistry, Dover Publications.
6. Bell, W.T., Brieger, E.F., and Harrigan, J.W. Jr. 1972. Laboratory Flow Characteristics Of Gun Perforations. J Pet Technol 24 (9): 1095-1103. SPE-3444-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3444-PA.
7. Box, G.E.P. and Hunter, J.S. 1957. Multifactor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces. Ann. Math. Statist. 28 (1): 195-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177707047.
8. Box, G.E.P. and Wilson, K.G. 1951. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 13 (1951): 1-45.
9. Deo, M., Tarlq, S.M., and Halleck, P.M. 1989. Linear and Radial Flow Targets for Characterizing Downhole Flow in Perforations. SPE Prod Eng 4 (3): 295-300. SPE 16896. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/16896-PA.
10. Dogulu, Y.S. 1998. Modeling of Well Productivity in Perforated Completions. Paper SPE 51048 presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 9-11 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/51048- MS.
11. Harris, M.H. 1966. The Effect of Perforating Oil Well Productivity. J Pet Technol 18 (4): 518-528. SPE-1236-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1236- PA.
12. Karakas, M. and Tariq, S.M. 1991. Semianalytical Productivity Models for Perforated Completions. SPE Prod Eng 6 (1): 73-82. SPE-18247-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18247-PA.
13. Klotz, J.A., Krueger, R.F., and Pye, D.S. 1974. Effect of Perforation Damage on Well Productivity. J Pet Technol 26 (11): 1033-1314. SPE-4654- PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4654-PA.
14. Locke, S. 1981. An Advanced Method for Predicting the Productivity Ratio of a Perforated Well. J Pet Technol 33 (12): 2481-2488. SPE-8804-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/8804-PA. (Pubitemid 12532013)
15. MATLAB® version 7.2, release R2006a 1 March (2006). 2006. Natick, Massachusetts: The Mathworks, Inc.
16. Montgomery, D.C. 2001. Design and Analysis of Experiments, fifth edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Yildiz, T. and Roostapour, A. 2005. Post-Perforation Flow Models for API Recommended Practices 19B. Paper SPE-94245-PA presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 16-19 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94245-MS.