Predicting personalized multiple birth risks after in vitro fertilization-double embryo transfer

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 69-76

  Lannon, Benjamin M ^a,b,c   Choi, Bokyung ^d,e   Hacker, Michele R ^b,c   Dodge, Laura E ^b   Malizia, Beth A ^f   Barrett, C Brent ^a,b,c   Wong, Wing H ^d,e   Yao, Mylene W M ^d   Penzias, Alan S ^a,b,c  

^a BOSTON IVF   (United States)

^b BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d Univfy Inc   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Alabama Fertility Specialists   (United States)

Author keywords

elective single embryo transfer; IVF prediction; multiple birth; personalized prognosis; prediction model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DOUBLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; LIVE BIRTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; PATIENT COUNSELING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; INFERTILITY; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIPLE BIRTH OFFSPRING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84862984054     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. M.M. van Heesch, G.J. Bonsel, J.C. Dumoulin, J.L. Evers, M.A. van der Hoeven, and J.L. Severens Long term costs and effects of reducing the number of twin pregnancies in IVF by single embryo transfer: the TwinSing study BMC Pediatr 10 2010 75
2. H.G. Lukassen, Y. Schonbeck, E.M. Adang, D.D. Braat, G.A. Zielhuis, and J.A. Kremer Cost analysis of singleton versus twin pregnancies after in vitro fertilization Fertil Steril 81 2004 1240 1246 (Pubitemid 38609305)
3. J. Bernasko, L. Lynch, R. Lapinski, and R.L. Berkowitz Twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive techniques: maternal and neonatal outcomes Obstet Gynecol 89 1997 368 372 (Pubitemid 27086090)
4. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group Multiple gestation pregnancy Hum Reprod 15 2000 1856 1864
5. B. Luke, M.B. Brown, D.A. Grainger, M. Cedars, N. Klein, and J.E. Stern Practice patterns and outcomes with the use of single embryo transfer in the United States Fertil Steril 93 2010 490 498
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports 2010 US Department of Health and Human Services Atlanta, GA
7. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Guidelines on number of embryos transferred Fertil Steril 92 2009 1518 1519
8. J.E. Stern, M.B. Goldman, H. Hatasaka, T.A. MacKenzie, C. Racowsky, and E.S. Surrey Optimizing the number of blastocyst stage embryos to transfer on day 5 or 6 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study Fertil Steril 91 2009 157 166
9. J.E. Stern, M.B. Goldman, H. Hatasaka, T.A. MacKenzie, E.S. Surrey, and C. Racowsky Optimizing the number of cleavage stage embryos to transfer on day 3 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study Fertil Steril 91 2009 767 776
10. J.E. Stern, M.I. Cedars, T. Jain, N.A. Klein, C.M. Beaird, and D.A. Grainger Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States Fertil Steril 88 2007 275 282 (Pubitemid 47232317)
11. J.D. Kresowik, B.J. Stegmann, A.E. Sparks, G.L. Ryan, and B.J. van Voorhis Five-years of a mandatory single-embryo transfer (mSET) policy dramatically reduces twinning rate without lowering pregnancy rates Fertil Steril 96 2011 1367 1369
12. E.S. Jungheim, G.L. Ryan, E.D. Levens, A.F. Cunningham, G.A. Macones, and K.R. Carson Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertil Steril 94 2010 1432 1436
13. N. Gleicher, and D. Barad Twin pregnancy, contrary to consensus, is a desirable outcome in infertility Fertil Steril 91 2009 2426 2431
14. N. Gleicher, D.M. Oleske, I. Tur-Kaspa, A. Vidali, and V. Karande Reducing the risk of high-order multiple pregnancy after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins N Engl J Med 343 2000 2 7 (Pubitemid 30447985)
15. F.A. Chervenak, L.B. McCullough, and Z. Rosenwaks Ethical dimensions of the number of embryos to be transferred in in vitro fertilization J Assist Reprod Genet 18 2001 583 587 (Pubitemid 34056729)
16. R. Voelker Researchers in Canada call for policy to mandate single-embryo transfer in IVF JAMA 305 2011 1848
17. M. Twisk, F. van der Veen, S. Repping, M.J. Heineman, J.C. Korevaar, and P.M. Bossuyt Preferences of subfertile women regarding elective single embryo transfer: additional in vitro fertilization cycles are acceptable, lower pregnancy rates are not Fertil Steril 88 2007 1006 1009 (Pubitemid 47498354)
18. L.L. van Loendersloot, M. van Wely, J. Limpens, P.M. Bossuyt, S. Repping, and F. van der Veen Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 16 2010 577 589
19. C.C. Hunault, M.J. Eijkemans, M.H. Pieters, E.R. te Velde, J.D. Habbema, and B.C. Fauser A prediction model for selecting patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for elective single embryo transfer Fertil Steril 77 2002 725 732 (Pubitemid 34275352)
20. V.L. Baker, B. Luke, M.B. Brown, R. Alvero, J.L. Frattarelli, and R. Usadi Multivariate analysis of factors affecting probability of pregnancy and live birth with in vitro fertilization: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System Fertil Steril 94 2010 1410 1416
21. S.M. Nelson, and D.A. Lawlor Predicting live birth, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in infants born from in vitro fertilisation: a prospective study of 144,018 treatment cycles PLoS Med 8 2011 e1000386
22. S.A. Roberts, L. McGowan, W. Mark Hirst, A. Vail, A. Rutherford, and B.A. Lieberman Reducing the incidence of twins from IVF treatments: predictive modelling from a retrospective cohort Hum Reprod 26 2011 569 575
23. R. Tur, P.N. Barri, B. Coroleu, R. Buxaderas, F. Martinez, and J. Balasch Risk factors for high-order multiple implantation after ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins: evidence from a large series of 1878 consecutive pregnancies in a single centre Hum Reprod 16 2001 2124 2129 (Pubitemid 32951905)
24. E. Leushuis, J.W. van der Steeg, P. Steures, P.M. Bossuyt, M.J. Eijkemans, and F. van der Veen Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal Hum Reprod Update 15 2009 537 552
25. P. Banerjee, B. Choi, L.K. Shahine, S.H. Jun, K. O'Leary, and R.B. Lathi Deep phenotyping to predict live birth outcomes in in vitro fertilization Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 2010 13570 13575
26. J.L. Eaton, M.R. Hacker, D. Harris, K.L. Thornton, and A.S. Penzias Assessment of day-3 morphology and euploidy for individual chromosomes in embryos that develop to the blastocyst stage Fertil Steril 91 2009 2432 2436
27. B.A. Malizia, M.R. Hacker, and A.S. Penzias Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization N Engl J Med 360 2009 236 243
28. Ridgeway G. Generalized boosted regression models. R package 1.6.3. 2007.
29. L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone Classification and regression trees 1984 Wadsworth Belmont, CA
30. J. Friedman Stochastic gradient boosting. Technical report 1999 Stanford University, Department of Statistics Stanford, CA
31. J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: a stochastic boosting machine 1999 Stanford University, Department of Statistics Stanford, CA
32. S.H. Jun, B. Choi, L. Shahine, L.M. Westphal, B. Behr, and R.A. Reijo Pera Defining human embryo phenotypes by cohort-specific prognostic factors PLoS One 3 2008 e2562