Group-in-a-box layout for multi-faceted analysis of communities

Proceedings - 2011 IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, PASSAT/SocialCom 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 354-361

  Rodrigues, Eduarda Mendes ^a   Milic Frayling, Natasa ^b   Smith, Marc ^c   Shneiderman, Ben ^d   Hansen, Derek ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c Connected Action Consulting Group ^*  (United States)

^d University of Maryland ^*  (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Clustering; Communities; Force directed; Group in a box; Layout; Meta layout; Network visualization; Semantic substrates

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING; FORCE-DIRECTED; GROUP-IN-A-BOX; LAYOUT; META-LAYOUT; NETWORK VISUALIZATION;

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; ECOSYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SOCIAL SCIENCES; SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING; SUBSTRATES; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VISUALIZATION;

GRAPH THEORY;

EID: 84862968380     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.139     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Asahi, T., Turo, D. and Shneiderman, B. (1995) Using treemaps to visualize the analytic hierarchy process. Information Systems Research, 6(4): 357-375. (Pubitemid 126102970)
2. Barabási, A.L. and Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439): 509-512.
3. Clauset, A., Newman, M.E.J. and Moore, C. (2004) Finding community structure in very large networks. Physics Review E, 70, 06111.
4. Eades, P. (1984). A Heuristic for Graph Drawing. Congressus Numerantium, 42:149-160.
5. Eades, P. and Feng, Q.-W. (1997). Multilevel Visualization of Clustered Graphs, Proc. Graph Drawing, LNCS, 1190: 101-112. (Pubitemid 127024204)
6. Erdös, P. and Rényi, A. (1959). On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae (Debrecen), 6:290-297.
7. Girvan, M. and Newman, M.E.J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks, Proc. National Academy of Sciences, 99:7821-7826. (Pubitemid 34650963)
8. Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness.Sociometry, 40:35-41.
9. Fruchterman, T.M.J., and Reingold, E.M. (1991). Graph Drawing by Force-Directed Placement. Software: Practice & Experience, 21(11): 1129-1164.
10. Hansen, D.L., Shneiderman, B., Smith, M.A. (2010). Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World. Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Harel, D. and Koren, Y. (2002). A Fast Multi-Scale Algorithm for Drawing Large Graphs. J. of Graph Algorithms Appl., 6(3):179-202.
12. Harrer, A, Malzahn, N, Zeinin, S, and Hoppe, HU (2007). Combining Social Network Analysis with Semantic Relations to Support the Evolution of a Scientific Community, Proc. 7th Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, 267-276.
13. Henry, N., Bezerianos, A. and Fekete, J-D. (2008). Improving the Readability of Clustered Social Networks using Vertex Duplication. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(6): 1317-1324.
14. Henry, N., Fekete, J.-D. and McGuffin, M.J. (2007). NodeTrix: a hybrid visualization of social networks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6):1302-1309. (Pubitemid 350076603)
15. Johnson, B. and Shneiderman, B. (1991). Treemaps: A space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures, Proc. 2nd International IEEE Visualization Conference, 284-291.
16. Kamps, T., Kleinz J. and Read, J. (1995). Constraint-Based Spring- Model Algorithm for Graph Layout, Proc. Graph Drawing 95, LNCS 1027, 349-360. (Pubitemid 126025102)
17. Krempel, L. (1993). Simple representations of complex networks: strategies for visualizing network structure. Presented at the 3rd European Conference for Network Analysis, Munich.
18. Noack, A. (2008). An Energy Model for Visual Graph Clustering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(6): 1333-1339.
19. Shneiderman, B. (1992) Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d spacefilling approach. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 11(1):92-99.
20. Shneiderman, B., Aris, A. (2006). Network Visualization by Semantic Substrates. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5): 733 - 740. (Pubitemid 44955598)
21. Smith, M. A., Shneiderman, B., Milic-Frayling, N., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Barash, V., Dunne, C., Capone, T., Perer, A. and Gleave, E. (2009). Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL. Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T'09), 255-264.
22. Taylor, A. and Higham, D.J. (2009). CONTEST: a controllable test matrix toolbox for MATLAB. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 35(4), Article 26.
23. Wakita, K. and Tsurumi, Y. (2007). Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks, Proc. 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, 1275-1276. (Pubitemid 47582418)
24. Watts, D.J. and Strogatz, S.H. (1998). Collective dynamics of'smallworld'networks. Nature, 393:440-442.