Attribute agenda setting, priming and the media's influence on how to think about a controversial issue

International Communication Gazette

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 43-59

  Kim, Sei Hill ^a   Han, Miejeong ^b   Choi, Doo Hun ^c   Kim, Jeong Nam ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b Hanyang University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

attribute agenda setting; media effects; priming; second level agenda setting; South Korea

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862946187     PISSN: 17480485     EISSN: 17480493     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1748048511426991     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Althaus SL,Kim YM.Priming effects in complex information environments: Reassessing the impact of news discourse on presidential approval.The Journal of Politics. 2006;68:960-970.
2. Ansolabehere S,Behr R,Iyengar SThe Media Game: American Politics in the Television Age. New York: Macmillan; 1993:.
3. Bassili JN.Response latency and the accessibility of voting intentions: What contributes to accessibility and how it affects vote choice.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995;21:686-695.
4. BBC News (2004) S Korea Chooses New Capital Site. Available at: news.bbc.co.uk_2_hi_asia-pacific_3554296.stm.
5. Chaffee SH,Frank S.How Americans get political information: Print versus broadcast news.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1996;546:48-58.
6. Cobb RW,Elder CDParticipation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1972:.
7. Cohen BThe Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1963:.
8. Dursun OPaper presented at the biennial international conference of the European Union Studies Association. TX: Austin; 2005:.
9. Entman R.Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication. 1993;41:51-58.
10. First ACommunication and Democracy. McCombs MShaw DLWeaver D, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997:41-50.
11. Gamson WA,Modigliani A.Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach.American Journal of Sociology. 1989;95:1-37.
12. Golan G,Wanta W.Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2001;78:247-259.
13. Herman ES,Chomsky NManufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon; 1988:.
14. Hodges D,Wilson TD.Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude change: The moderating role of attitude accessibility.Social Cognition. 1993;11:353-366.
15. Iyengar S.The accessibility bias in politics: Television news and public opinion.International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 1990;2:1-15.
16. Iyengar SIs Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1991:.
17. Iyengar S,Kinder DRNews that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1987:.
18. Kim S-H,Han M.Media use and participatory democracy in South Korea: News media vs. entertainment media.Mass Communication and Society. 2005;8:133-153.
19. Kim S-H,Scheufele DA,Shanahan J.Thank about it this way: Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public's evaluation of a local issue.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2002;79:1-25.
20. KimT (2004) Capital relocation ads annoy Seoul City. The Korea Herald. Available at: www.koreaherald.co.kr/archives/result_contents.asp?id=200407310027&query=annoyseoul.
21. King PCommunication and Democracy. McCombs MShaw DLWeaver D, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997:29-40.
22. Kiousis S.Compelling arguments and attitude strength: Exploring the impact of second-level agenda setting on public opinion of presidential candidate images.Press/Politics. 2005;10:3-27.
23. Krosnick JA,Brannon LA.The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement.American Political Science Review. 1993;87:963-975.
24. Lopez-Escobar E,McCombs ME,Lennon FR.Two levels of agenda setting among advertising and news in the 1995 Spanish elections.Political Communication. 1998;15:225-238.
25. McCombs M.New frontiers in agenda-setting. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication; 1997Chicago, IL; 1997.
26. McCombs MSetting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2004:.
27. McCombs M.A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future.Journalism Studies. 2005;6:543-557.
28. McCombs M,Estrada GDo the Media Govern? London: Sage. Iyengar SReeves R, ed. 1997:237-247.
29. McCombs M,Evatt D.Issues and attributes: Exploring a new dimension in agenda setting.Communication Sociedad. 1995;8:7-32.
30. McCombs M,Shaw DL.The agenda setting function of mass media.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1972;36:176-187.
31. McCombs M,Llamas JP,Lopez-Escobar E,Rey F.Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 1997;74:703-717.
32. Meijer M-M,Kleinnijenhuis J.Issue news and corporate reputation: Applying the theories of agenda setting and issue ownership in the field of business communication.Journal of Communication. 2006;56:543-559.
33. Nelson TE,Clawson RA,Oxley ZM.Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance.American Political Science Review. 1997;91:567-583.
34. Pew Research Center (2004) News Audience Increasingly Polarized. Available at: people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=833.
35. Price V,Tewksbury DProgress in Communication Sciences: Advances in Persuasion. Barett GABoster FJ, ed. Greenwich, CT: Ablex; 1997:173-212.
36. Scheufele DA.Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication.Mass Communication and Society. 2000;3:297-316.
37. Scheufele DA,Tewksbury D.Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The Evolution of three media effects models.Journal of Communication. 2007;57:9-20.
38. Sheafer T.How to evaluate it: The role of story-evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming.Journal of Communication. 2007;57:21-39.
39. Stone G,McCombs M.Tracing the time lag in agenda-setting.Journalism Quarterly. 1981;58:51-55.
40. Takeshita T,Mikami S.How did the media influence the voters' choice in the 1993 general election in Japan? Analysis of agenda setting.Keio Communication Review. 1997;17:27-41.
41. The Korea Times (2005) President Roh's reasoning unconvincing. Available at: times.hankooki.com/plaza/plaza_domestic.php?cur_date=20050328&page=7.
42. Tversky A,Kahneman D.Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognitive Psychology. 1973;5:207-222.
43. Van Dijk TA.Political Communication in Action: States, Institutions, Movement, Audiences. Paletz DL, ed. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press; 1996:9-36.
44. Wikipedia (2006) New capital. Available at: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gongju.
45. Willnat L,Zhu J-H.Newspaper coverage of public opinion in Hong Kong: A time-series analysis of media priming.Political Communication. 2001;13:231-246.
46. Zaller JR,Feldman S.A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences.American Journal of Political Science. 1992;36:579-616.