What determinates student learning satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment?

PACIS 2008 - 12th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Leveraging ICT for Resilient Organizations and Sustainable Growth in the Asia Pacific Region

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Wu, Jen Her ^a   Hsia, Tzyh Lih ^b   Liao, Yi Wen ^a   Tennyson, Robert D ^c  

^a NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Chinese Naval Academy Kaohsiung   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Blended e learning system; E learning; Learning satisfaction; TAM

Indexed keywords

CAUSAL MODEL; COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY; DETERMINANT FACTORS; E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; E-LEARNING SYSTEMS; FACTOR ANALYSIS; LEARNING SATISFACTION; MEASUREMENT MODEL; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES METHOD; PERCEIVED BEHAVIORAL CONTROL; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED VALUE; RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY; SATISFACTION MODEL; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; STUDENT LEARNING; SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY; TAM;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; E-LEARNING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SOCIAL SCIENCES; STUDENTS;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84862917829     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Alavi, M. and Joachimsthaler, E.A. (1992). Revisiting DSS Implementation Research: A Meta-analysis of the Literature and Suggests for Researchers. MIS Quarterly, 16(1), 95-116.
2. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thomson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Causal Modeling, Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration. Technology Studies. 2(2), 285-309.
3. Chen, C., Czerwinski, M., and Macredie, R. (2000). Individual Differences in Virtual environments: Introduction and Overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 499-507.
4. Chin, W.W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In: Marcoulides GA, editor. Modern Methods for Business Research, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 295-236.
5. Chiu, C.M., Hsu, M.H., and Sun, S.Y. (2005). Usability, Quality, Value and E-learning Continuance Decisions. Computers and Education, 45(4), 399-416.
6. Chou, S.W. and Liu, C.H. (2005). Learning Effectiveness in a Web-based Virtual Learning Environment: A Learner Control Perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 65-76.
7. Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer Self-efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
8. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318-339.
9. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J., and Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the Efficacy of Collaborative Learning in Face-to-face and Computer-supported University Contexts. Computers in Human Behaviour, 22(2), 163-176. (Pubitemid 41563022)
11. Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (2005). A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(5), 91-109.
12. Graham, C.R. (2006). Chapter 1: Blended Learning System: Definition, Current Trends, Future Directions. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Blended Learning, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
13. Hong, W., Thong, J.Y. L., Wong, W.M., and Tam, K.Y. (2002). Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97-124. (Pubitemid 34048272)
14. Johnston, J., Killion, J., and Oomen, J. (2005). Student Satisfaction in the Virtual Classroom. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3(2).
15. Kinshuk, D., and Yang, A. (2003). Web-based Asynchronous Synchronous Environment for Online Learning. United States Distance Education Association Journal, 17(2), 5-17.
16. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P., and Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the Pitfalls for Social Interaction in Computer-supported Collaborative Learning Environments: A Review of the Research. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19(3), 335-353.
17. Löhmoeller, J.B. (1984). LVPS 1.6 Program Manual: Latent Variable Path Analysis with Partial Least Squares Estimation, Universitaet zu Koehn, Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung.
18. Martins, L.L. and Kellermanns, F.W. (2004). A Model of Business School Students' Acceptance of a Web-Based Course Management System. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(1), 7-26.
19. Molla, A., and Licker, P.S. (2001). E-commerce Systems Success: An Attempt to Extend and Respecify the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2(4), 1-11.
20. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., and Ives, B. (2001). Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: A Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic it Skills Training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426. (Pubitemid 33738436)
21. Pituch, K.A., and Lee, Y. (2006). The Influence of System Characteristics on E-learning use. Computer & Education, 47(2), 222-244. (Pubitemid 43792307)
22. Prieto, I.M., and Revilla, E. (2006). Formal and Informal Facilitators of Learning Capability: The Moderating Effect of Learning Climate. IE Working Paper. WP06-09. 21-02-2006.
23. Rai, A, Patnayakuni, R, and Seth, N. "Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally-enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities," MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 2006, pp. 225-246. (Pubitemid 46050490)
24. Scarborough, N. M., and Zimmer, T. W. (2000). Effective Small Business Management: An Entrepreneurial Approach. Upper Saddler River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
25. So, H.J. (2006). Student Satisfaction in a Blended Learning Course: A Qualitative Approach Focusing on Critical Factors. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, California.
26. Taylor, S., and Todd, P.A. (1995). Decomposition and Crossover Effects in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study of Consumer Adoption Intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 137-156.
27. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F.D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. (Pubitemid 30594361)
28. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly. 27(3), 425-478.
29. Wu, J.H. and Wang, S.C. (2005). What Drives Mobile Commerce? An Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management, 42(5), 719-729.
30. Wu, J.H., Tennyson, R.D., Hsia, T.L., and Liao, Y.W. (2008). Analysis of E-Learning Innovation and Core Capability Using a Hypercube Model. Computers in Human Behavior. (Forthcoming)
31. Yang, Z. and Liu, Q. (2007). Research and Development of Web-based Virtual Online Classroom. Computers and Education, 48(2), 171-184. (Pubitemid 44573572)
32. Zhang, X., Keeling, K.B., and Pavur, R.J. (2000). Information Quality of Commercial Website Home Pages: An Explorative Analysis. Proceeding of the 21th International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia, 164-175.