Erratum: Ecology and distribution of the isopod genus idotea in the Baltic sea: Key species in a changing environment (Journal of Crustacean Biology (2012) 32:3 (359-389) DOI: 10.1163/193724012X626485);Ecology and aistribution of the isopod genus idotea in the baltic sea: Key species in a changing environment

Journal of Crustacean Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 359-381

  Leidenberger, Sonja ^a   Harding, Karin ^b   Jonsson, Per R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b Department of Marine Ecology ^*  (Sweden)

Author keywords

Baltic Sea; distribution patterns; environmental changes; Idotea; key species

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; FUCUS; IDOTEA; IDOTEA CHELIPES; IDOTEA GRANULOSA; IDOTEIDAE; ISOPODA; ZOSTERA MARINA;

EID: 84862903663     PISSN: 02780372     EISSN: 1937240X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jcbiol/ruaa036     Document Type: Erratum

References (155)

1. Anger, K. 1975. On the influence of sewage pollution on inshore benthic communities in the South of Kiel Bay. Helogländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 27: 408-438.
2. Appeltans, W., P. Bouchet, G. A. Boxshall, K. Fauchald, D. P. Gordon, B. W. Hoeksema, G. C. B. Poore, R. W. M. van Soest, S. Stöhr, T. C. Walter, and M. J. Costello (eds.). 2010. World Register of Marine Species. Accessed at http://www.marinespecies.org (31.01.2011).
3. Arndt, E. A. 1964. Tiere der Ostsee. Ziemsen Verlag, Lutherstadt Wittenberg. pp. 94-166.
4. Baden, S., and L. Pihl. 1984. Abundances, biomass and production of mobile epibenthic fauna in Zostera marina (L.) meadows, western Sweden. Ophelia 23: 65-90.
5. C. Boström, S. Tobiasson, H. Arponen, and P.-O. Moksnes. 2010. Relative importance of trophic interactions and nutrient enrichment in seagrass ecosystems: A broad-scale field experiment in the Baltic-Skagerrak area. Limnology and Oceanography 55: 1435-1448.
6. Vanishing seagrass (Zostera marina, L.) in Swedish coastal waters. Ambio 32: 374-377.
7. Bat, L., M. Sezgin, A. Gündogdu, and M. Culha. 1999. Toxicity on zinc, copper and lead to Idotea baltica (Crustacea, Isopoda). Turkish Journal of Biology 23: 465-472.
8. Belkin, I. M. 2009. Rapid warming of large marine Ecosystems. Progress in Oceanography 81: 207-213.
9. Betz, K.-H. 1974. Phänologie, Reproduktion und Wachstum der valviferen Assel Idotea chelipes (Pallas, 1766) in der Schlei. Kieler Meeresforschung 30: 65-79.
10. Bobsien, I. C. 2006. The role of small fish species in eelgrass food webs of the Baltic Sea. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kiel, Germany.
11. Bonsdorff, E. 1992. Drifting algae and zoobenthos-effects on settling and community structure. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 30: 57-62. (Pubitemid 24409353)
12. and 2006. Zoobenthic diversity-gradient in the Baltic Sea: continuous post-glacial succession in a stressed ecosystem. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 330: 383-391.
13. Boström, C., and E. Bonsdorff. 1997. Community structure and spatial variation of benthic invertebrates associated with Zostera marina (L.) beds in the northern Baltic Sea. Journal of Sea Research 37: 153-166. (Pubitemid 27242980)
14. and 2000. Zoobenthic community establishment and habitat complexity-The importance of seagrass shoot-density, morphology and physical disturbance for faunal recruitment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 205: 123-138.
15. J. Mattila. 1999. The relative importance of food and shelter for seagrass-associated invertebrates: A latitudinal comparison of habitat choice by isopod grazers. Oecologia 120: 162-170. (Pubitemid 29365557)
16. and 2005. Effects of Isopod grazing: An experimental comparison in temperate (Idotea balthica, Baltic Sea, Finland) and subtropical (Erichsonella attenuata, Gulf of Mexico, USA) ecosystems. Crustaceana 78: 185-200.
17. S. P. Baden, and D. Krause-Jensen. 2003. The seagrasses of Scandinavia and the Baltic Sea, pp. 27-37.
18. E. P. Green and F. T. Short (eds.),World Atlas of Seagrasses. UNEPWorld Conservation Monitoring Centre. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
19. E. Bonsdorff, P. Kangas, and A. Norkko. 2002. Long-Term changes of a brackish-water eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) community indicate effects of coastal eutrophication. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 55: 795-894.
20. Bulnheim, H. P. 1974. Respiratory metabolism of Idotea balthica (Crustacea, Isopoda) in relation to environmental variables, acclimation processes and moulting. Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 26: 464-480.
21. Diaz, R. J., and R. Rosenberg. 2008. Spreading dead zones and consequences for Marine Ecosystems. Science 321: 926-929.
22. Ducrotoy, J.-P., and M. Elliott. 2008. The science and management of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea: natural history, present threats and future challenges. Marine Pollution Bulletin 57: 8-21.
23. Duffy, J. E., K. S. MacDonald, J. M. Rhode, and J. D. Parker. 2001. Grazer diversity, functional redundancy, and productivity in seagrass beds: An experimental test. Ecology 82: 2417-2434. (Pubitemid 32908140)
24. Elken, J., and W. Matthäus. 2008. Baltic Sea oceanography, p. 474. In, H. von Storch and A. Omstedt (eds.), Assessment of Climate Change for the Baltic Sea Basin. BALTEX Publication. Springer, Berlin.
25. Engkvist, R., T. Malm, and J. Nilsson. 2004. Interaction between isopod grazing and wave action: A structuring force in macroalgal communities in the southern Baltic Sea. Aquatic Ecology 38: 403-413. (Pubitemid 38947214)
26. S. Tobiasson. 2000. Density dependent grazing effects of the isopod Idotea baltica Pallas on Fucus vesiculosus L in the Baltic Sea. Aquatic Ecology 34: 253-260. (Pubitemid 32176565)
27. Eriksson, B. K., L. Ljunggren, A. Sandström, G. Johansson, J. Mattila, A. Rubach, S. Råberg, and M. Snickars. 2009. Declines in predatory fish promote bloom-forming macroalgae. Ecological Application 19: 1975-1988.
28. Forslund, H. 2009. Grazing and the geographical range of seaweeds. Licentiate Thesis, University of Stockholm, Sweden.
29. Forsman, B. 1956. Notes on the invertebrate fauna of the Baltic. Arkiv för Zoologi (2), Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademien 9: 389-419.
30. Goecker,M. E., and S. E. Kall. 2003. Grazing preferences of marine isopods and amphipods on three prominent algal species of the Baltic Sea. Journal of Sea Research 50: 309-314. (Pubitemid 37435823)
31. Gohse-Reimann, S. S. 2007. Untersuchungen zur Ernährungsö kologie benthischer Invertebraten im Makrophytensystem: Ein marin-limnischer Ansatz. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kiel, Germany.
32. Gruner, H.-E. 1965. Krebstiere oder Crustacea. 51. Teil. V. Isopoda. In, M. Dahl and F. Peus (eds.), Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meeresteile nach ihren Merkmalen und nach ihrer Lebensweise. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany.
33. Gutow, L., and H.-D. Franke. 2003. Metapopulation structure of the marine isopod Idotea metallica, a species associated with drifting habitat patches. Helgoländer Marine Research 56: 259-264. (Pubitemid 41409969)
34. S. Leidenberger, K. Boos, and H. D. Franke. 2007. Differential life history responses of two Idotea species (Crustacea: Isopoda) to food limitation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 344: 159-172. (Pubitemid 47475675)
35. Haage, P. 1975. Quantitative investigations of the Baltic Fucus belt macrofauna. 2. Quantitative seasonal fluctuations. Contributions from the Askö Laboratory, No. 9, University of Stockholm, Sweden.
36. Haahtela, I. 1984. A hypothesis of the decline of the Bladder Wrack (Fucus vesiculosus L.) in SW Finland in 1975-1981. Limnologia 15: 345-350.
37. Hällfors, G., P. Kangas, and Å. Niemi. 1984. Recent changes in the phytal at the south coast of Finland. Ophelia 3(suppl.): 51-59.
38. Halpern, B. S., S. Walbridge, K. A. Selkoe, C. V. Kappel, F. Micheli, C. D'Agrosa, J. F. Bruno, K. S. Casey, C. Ebert, H. E. Fox, R. Fujita, D. Heinemann, H. S. Lenihan, E. M. P. Madin, M. T. Perry, E. R. Selig, M. Spalding, R. Steneck, and R. Watson. 2008. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319: 948-952. (Pubitemid 351263764)
39. Hammer, C., C. von Dorrien, P. Ernst, T. Gröhsler, F. Köster, B. MacKenzie, C. Möllmann, G. Wegner, and C. Zimmermann. 2008. Fish stock development under hydrographic and hydrochemical aspects, the history of Baltic Sea fisheries and its management. In, R. Feistel, G. Nausch, and N. Wasmund (eds.), State and Evolution of the Baltic Sea, 1952-2005. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New Jersey.
40. Hayward, P. J., and J. S. Ryland (eds.). 1995. Handbook of the Marine Fauna of North-West Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
41. Hemmi, A., and V. Jormalainen. 2002. Nutrient enhancement increases performance of a marine herbivore via quality of its food alga. Ecology 83: 1052-1064. (Pubitemid 36530996)
42. and 2004. Geographic covariation of chemical quality of the host alga Fucus vesiculosus with fitness of the herbivorous isopod Idotea baltica. Marine Biology 145: 759-768.
43. A. Mäkinen, V. Jormalainen, and T. Honkanen. 2005. Responses of growth and phlorotannins in Fucus vesiculosus to nutrient enrichment and herbivory. Aquatic Ecology 39: 201-211. (Pubitemid 40906931)
44. Hill, C., and K. Wallström. 2008. Stockholm Archipelago, pp. 309-334. In, U. Schiewer (ed.), Ecology of Baltic Coastal Waters. Ecological Studies. Vol. 197. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
45. Hurrell, J. W., and C. Deser. 2009. North Atlantic climate variability: The role of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Journal of Marine Systems 78: 28-41.
46. Horlyck, V. 1973a. Seasonal and diel variation in the rhythmicity of Idotea baltica (Pallas) and Idotea granlosa Rathke. Ophelia 12: 117-127.
47. and 1973b. The osmoregulatory ability in three species of the genus Idotea (Isopoda, Crustacea). Ophelia 12: 129-140.
48. Ihaksi, T., I. Helle, T. Lecklin, R. Ryömä, T. Kokkonen, and S. Kuikka. 2007. Using biological knowledge and decisions of society in spatial prioritization of oil combating. ICES CM 2007/C:02.
49. Ingolfsson, A. 1992. The origin of the rocky shore fauna of Iceland and the Canadian Maritimes. Journal of Biogeography 19: 705-712.
50. Janas, U., J.Wocial, and A. Szaniawska. 2004. Seasonal and annual changes in the macrozoobenthic populations of the Gulf of Gdansk with respect to hypoxia and hydrogen sulphide. Ocenaologia 46: 85-102. (Pubitemid 38462642)
51. Jansson, A.-M. 1974. Community structure, modelling and stimulation of the Cladophora ecosystem in the Baltic Sea. Contributions from the Askö Laboratory, No. 5, University of Stockholm, Sweden.
52. A.-S. Matthiesen. 1971. On the ecology of young Idotea in the Baltic, pp. 71-88. In, Fourth European Marine Biology Symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
53. Jansson, B.-O., and C. Källander. 1968. On the diurnal activity of some littoral peracarid crustaceans in the Baltic Sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 2: 24-36.
54. Jaschinski, S. 2007. The effects of mesograzers in eelgrass communities. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kiel, Germany.
55. U. Sommer. 2008. Top-down and bottom-up control in an eelgrass-epiphyte system. Oikos 117: 754-762. (Pubitemid 351614842)
56. Jazdzewski, K. 1970. Biology of Crustacea Malacostraca in the Bay of Puck, Polish Baltic Sea. Zoologica Poloniae 20: 423-480.
57. A. Konopacka, and M. Grabowski. 2005. Native and alien Malacostracan Crustacea along the Polish Baltic Sea coast in the twentieth century. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 24(1)(suppl.): 175-193.
58. Jephson, T., P. Nyström, P.-O. Moksnes, and S. P. Baden. 2008. Trophic interactions in Zostera marina beds along the Swedish coast. Marine Ecology Progress Series 369: 63-76.
59. Johannesson, K., and C. André. 2006. Life on the margin: genetic isolation and diversity loss in a peripheral marine ecosystem, the Baltic Sea. Molecular Ecology 15: 2013-2029. (Pubitemid 43876448)
60. Jormalainen, V., and J. Tuomi. 1989. Sexual differences in habitat selection and activity of the colour polymorphic isopod Idotea baltica. Animal Behaviour 38: 576-585. (Pubitemid 20420526)
61. T. Honkanen, and N. Heikkilä. 2001b. Feeding preferences and performance of a marine isopod on seaweed hosts: cost of habitat specialization. Marine Ecology Progress Series 220: 219-230. (Pubitemid 33028059)
62. O. Vesakoski. 2008. Geographical divergence in host use ability of a marine herbivore in alga-grazer interaction. Evolutionary Ecology 22: 545-559.
63. J. Tuomi, and S. Merilaita. 1992. Mate choice for male and female size in aquatic isopod Idotea balthica. Annales Zoologici Fennici 29: 161-167. (Pubitemid 24407496)
64. T. Honkanen, O. Vesakoski, and R. Koivikko. 2005. Polar extracts of the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus (L.) reduce assimilation efficiency but do not deter the herbivorous isopod Idotea baltica (Pallas). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 317: 143-157. (Pubitemid 40440953)
65. A. Mäkinen, A. Hemmi, and O. Vesakoski. 2001a. Why does herbivore sex matter? Sexual differences in utilization of Fucus vesiculosus by the isopod Idotea baltica. Oikos 93: 77-86. (Pubitemid 32489196)
66. Kangas, P., H. Autio, G. Hällfors, H. Luther, Å. Niemi, and H. Salemaa. 1982. A general model of the decline of Fucus vesiculosus at Tvärminne, south coast of Finland in 1977-81. Acta Botanica Fennica 118: 1-27.
67. Karez, R., S. Engelbert, and U. Sommer. 2000. Co-consumption and protective coating: Two new proposed effects of epiphytes on their macroalgal hosts in mesograzer-epiphyte interactions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 205: 85-93.
68. Kautsky, H. 2008. Askö area and Himmerfjärden, pp. 335-360. In, U. Schiewer (ed.), Ecology of Baltic Coastal Waters. Ecological Studies. Vol. 197. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
69. Khlebovich, V. V. 1990. Some physico-chemical and biological phenomena in the salinity gradient. Limnologica 20: 5-8.
70. Korheina, A. K. 1981. Environment and co-existence of Idotea species in the southern Baltic. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Lund, Sweden. Korpinen, S., and V. Jormalainen. 2008. Grazing effects in macroalgal communities depend on timing of patch colonization. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 360: 39-46.
71. T. Honkanen. 2007. Bottom-up and cascading top-down control of macroalgae along a depth gradient. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 343: 52-63. (Pubitemid 46281947)
72. E. Pettay. 2010. Nutrient availability modifies species abundance and community structure of Fucus-associated littoral benthic fauna. Marine Environmental Research 70: 283-292.
73. Kotta, J., and T. Möller. 2009. Important scales of distribution patterns of benthic species in the Gretagrund area, the central Gulf of Riga. Estonian Journal of Ecology 58: 259-269.
74. T. Paalme, G. Martin, and A. Mäkinen. 2000a. Major changes in macroalgae community composition affect the food and habitat preference of Idotea baltica. International Review of Hydrobiology 85: 697-705.
75. H. Orav-Kotta, T. Paalme, I. Kotta, and H. Kukk. 2006. Seasonal changes in situ grazing of the mesoherbivores Idotea baltica and Gammarus oceanicus on the brown algae Fucus vesiculosus and Pylaiella littoralis in the central Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea. Hydrobiologia 554: 117-125.
76. K. Torn, G. Martin, H. Orav-Kotta, and T. Paalme. 2004. Seasonal variation in invertebrate grazing on Chara connivens and C. tomentosa in Koiguste Bay, NE Baltic Sea. Helgoländer Marine Research 58: 71-76. (Pubitemid 39039701)
77. V. Lauringson, G. Martin, M. Simm, I. Kotta, K. Herkül, and H. Ojaveer. 2000b. Gulf of Riga and Pärnu Bay, pp. 217-244. In, U. Schiewer (ed.), Ecology of Baltic Coastal Waters. Ecological Studies. Vol. 197. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
78. Kroyer, H. 1842. Nye nordiske slagter og arter af Amfipodernes orden, henhorende til familien Gammarina. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift. Copenhagen 1(4): 153.
79. Lapucki, T., and M. Normant. 2008. Physiological responses to salinity changes of the isopod Idotea chelipes from the Baltic brackish waters. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A 149: 299-305.
80. M. Feike, G. Graf, and A. Szaniawska. 2005. Comparative studies on the metabolic rate of the isopod Idotea chelipes (Pallas) inhabiting different regions of the Baltic Sea. Thermochimica acta 435: 6-10. (Pubitemid 41214664)
81. Lauringson, V., and J. Kotta. 2006. Influence of the thin drift algal mats on the distribution of macrozoobenthos in Koiguste Bay, NE Baltic Sea. Hydrobiologia 554: 97-105. (Pubitemid 41744241)
82. Leach, W. E. 1813-1814. Crustaceology. In, D. Brewster (ed.), The Edinburgh Encyclopedia. Vol. 7. Edinburgh.
83. Lindström, G. 1855. Bidrag till kännedom om Östersjöns invertebratfauna. Öfversättning af Konglinga Vetenskap Akademien förhandlingar. 12.
84. Stockholm. Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Edit. decima, reformata. Laurentii Salvius, Stockholm: i-iii, 1-828.
85. Lotze, H. K., and B. Worm. 2000. Variable and complementary effects of herbivores on different life stages of bloom-forming macroalgae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 200: 167-175.
86. Lozan, J. L., R. Lampe, W. Matthäus, E. Rachor, H. Rumohr, and H. von Westerhagen (eds.). 1996. Warnsignale aus der Ostesee. Parey Buchverlag, Berlin.
87. Meier, H. E. M., R. Döscher, and T. Faxén. 2003. A multi processor coupled ice-ocean model for the Baltic Sea: Application to salt inflow. Journal of Geophysical Research 108(C8): 327.
88. K. Eilola, and E. Almroth. 2011. Climate-related changes in marine ecosystems simulated with a three-dimensional coupled biogeochemicalphysical model of the Baltic Sea. Climate Research 48: 31-55.
89. Merilaita, S. 2001. Habitat heterogeneity, predation and gene flow: colour polymorphism in the isopod, Idotea baltica. Evolutionary Ecology 15: 103-116. (Pubitemid 34143550)
90. V. Jormalainen. 1997. Evolution of sex differences in microhabitat choice and colour polymorphism in Idotea baltica. Animal Behavior 54: 769-778. (Pubitemid 27471633)
91. and . 2000. Different roles of feeding and protection in diel microhabitat choice of sexes in Idotea baltica. Oecologia 122: 445-451.
92. Möbius, K. 1873. Die Expedition zur physikalisch-chemischen und biologischen Untersuchung der Ostsee im Sommer 1871 auf S.M. Avisodamper Pommerania. IV. Die faunistischen Untersuchungen. A. Die wirbellosen Thiere der Ostsee, pp. 97-144. In, H. A. Meyer, K. Möbius, G. Karsten, and V. Hensen (eds.), Jahresbericht der Commission zur wissenschafltichen Untersuchung der deutschen Meere in Kiel für das Jahr 1871. Verlag von Wiegandt & Hempel, Berlin.
93. Moksnes, P., M. Gullström, K. Tryman, and S. Baden. 2008. Trophic cascades in a temperate seagrass community. Oikos 117: 763-777. (Pubitemid 351614847)
94. Naylor, E. 1955a. The comparative external morphology and revised taxonomy of the British species of Idotea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 34: 467-493.
95. and 1955b. The diet and feeding mechanism of Idotea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 34: 347-355.
96. and 1972. British Marine Isopods. Academic Press, London, New York.
97. Nicotri, M. E. 1980. Factors involved in herbivore food preference. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 42: 13-26.
98. Nierstrasz, H. F., and J. H. Schuurmanns Steckhoven Jr. 1926. Isopoda genuina, pp. 57-133. In, Tierwelt der Nord-und Ostsee. Grimpe and Wagler, Leipzig.
99. Nilsson, J., R. Engkvist, and L.-E. Persson. 2004. Long-Term decline and recent recovery of Fucus populations along the rocky shores of southeast Sweden, Baltic Sea. Aquatic Ecology 38: 587-598. (Pubitemid 40033044)
100. Orav-Kotta, H., and J. Kotta. 2004. Food and habitat choice of the isopod Idotea baltica in the northeastern Baltic Sea. Hydrobiologia 514: 79-85. (Pubitemid 38448964)
101. I. Kotta. 2004. Comparison of macrozoobenthic communities between the 1960s and the 1990-2000s in the Väinameri, NE Baltic Sea. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences Biology Ecology 53: 283-291.
102. Osterblom H., S. Hansson, O. Hjerne, U. Larsson, F. Wulff, R. Elmgren, C. Folke, 2007. Human-induced trophic cascades and ecological regime shifts in the Baltic Sea. Ecosystems 10: 877-889.
103. Paine, R. T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. American Naturalist 100: 65-75.
104. and, 1969. A note on trophic complexity and community stability. American Naturalist 103: 91-93.
105. Pallas, P. S. 1766. Miscellanea zoological. Quibus novae imprimis atque obscurae animalium species describuntur et observationibus iconibusque illustrantur. xii, 224 pp. 14 pls. Hague Comitum.
106. and, 1772. Spicilegia zoological. Quibus novae imprimis et obscurae animalium species iconibus, descriptionibus atque commentariis illustrantur. 9. pp. 66-68. Berolini.
107. Paul, V. J., E. Cruz-Rivera, and R.W. Thacker. 2001. Chemical mediation of macroalgal-herbivore interactions: Ecological and evolutionary perspectives, pp. 227-265. In, J. B. McClintock and B. J. Baker (eds.), Marine Chemical Ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
108. Pavia, H., H. Carr, and P. Åberg. 1999. Habitat and feeding preferences of crustacean mesoherbivores inhabiting the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodusum (L.) Le Jol. and its epiphytic macroalgae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 236: 15-32. (Pubitemid 29142920)
109. Piraino, S., and G. Fanelli. 1999. Keystone species: what are we talking about? Conservation Ecology 3(1): r4 [online]. URL: http://www. consecol.org/vol3/iss1/resp4/.
110. Råberg, S., and L. Kautsky. 2007a. A comparative biodiversity study of the associated fauna of perennial fucoids and filamentous aglae. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 73: 249-258. (Pubitemid 46686921)
111. and, 2007b. Consumers affect prey biomass and diversity through resource partitioning. Ecology 88: 2468-2473.
112. and, 2008. Grazer identity is crucial for facilitating growth of the perennial brown alga Fucus vesiculosus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 361: 111-118.
113. Rathke, H. 1837. Zur Fauna der Krym. Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint Pétersbourg. Sciences Mathématiques, Physiques et Naturelles 2. Partie, Sciences Naturelles 3: 368-370.
114. and, 1843. Beiträge zur Fauna Norwegens. Nova Acta Physico-Medica Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum 20. Breslau et Bonn.
115. Roth, O., J. Kurtz, and T. B. H. Reusch. 2010. A summer heat wave decreases the immunocompetence of the mesograzer, Idotea baltica. Marine Biology 157: 1605-1611.
116. Salemaa, H. 1978. Geographical variability in the colour polymorphism of Idotea baltica (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic. Hereditas 88: 165-182. (Pubitemid 8394178)
117. and, 1979. Ecology of Idotea spp. in the North Baltic. Ophelia 18: 133-150.
118. and, 1985. Kryptological studies in Idotea spp. (Isopoda, Valvifera). Crustaceana 48: 74-87.
119. and, 1986. Ecological and genetic adaptations of Idotea spp. (Isopoda, Crustacea). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Helsinki, Finland.
120. and, 1987. Herbivory and microhabitat preferences of Idotea spp. (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic Sea. Ophelia 27: 1-15.
121. Sandén, P., and B. Håkansson. 1996. Long-Term trends in Secchi depth in the Baltic Sea. Limnology and Oceanography 41: 346-351. (Pubitemid 26311210)
122. Sars, S. O. 1899. Isopoda, pp. 78-86, pls. 32-35. In, An Account of the Crustacea of Norway. Vol. 2. Bergen.
123. Schaffelke, B., D. Evers, and A. Walhorn. 1995. Selective grazing of the isopod Idothea baltica between F. evanescens and F. vesiculosus from Kiel Fjord (western Baltic). Marine Biology 124: 215-218. (Pubitemid 26484158)
124. Schiewer, U. 2008. Greifswalder Bodden, Wismar-Bucht, Salzhaff, pp. 87-114. In, U. Schiewer (ed.), Ecology of Baltic Coastal Waters. Ecological Studies. Vol. 197. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
125. Schories, D., and U. Wilhelmsen. 2006. Die Ostsee, p. 58. In, Tiere und Pflanzen. Kosmosnaturführer. Franckh-Kosmos-Verlags-GmbH and Co. KG, Stuttgart.
126. Segerstråle, S. G. 1932. Quantitative Studien über den Tierbestand der Fucus-Vegetation in den Schären von Pellinge (an der Südküste Finnlands). Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Commentationes Biologicae 3: 1-14.
127. and, 1944a. Über die Verbreitung der Idotea-Arten im baltischen Meeresgebiet Finnlands. Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Commentationes Biologicae 9: 1-6.
128. and, 1944b. Weitere Studien über die Tierwelt der Fucus-Vegetation an der Südküste Finnlands. Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Commentationes Biologicae 9: 1-30.
129. Sieben, K., L. Ljunggren, U. Bergström, and B. K. Eriksson. 2011. A mesopredator release of stickleback promotes recruitment of macroalgae in the Baltic Sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 397: 79-84.
130. Sommer, U. 1997. Selectivity of Idothea chelipes (Crustacea: Isopoda) grazing on benthic microalgae. Limnology and Oceanography 42: 1622-1628. (Pubitemid 28184137)
131. Spooner, G. M. 1947. The distribution of Gammarus species in estuaries. Part 1. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 27: 1-52.
132. Svensson, P. A., T. Malm, and R. Engkvist. 2004. Distribution and host plant preference of Idotea baltica (Pallas) (Crustacea: Isopoda) on shallow rocky shores in the central Baltic Sea. Sarsia 89: 1-7. (Pubitemid 38355677)
133. Sywula, T. 1964a. A study on the taxonomy, ecology and the geographical distribution of species of genus Idotea Fabricius (Isopoda, Crustacea) in Polish Baltic. I. Taxonomical part. Bulletin de la societe des amis des sciences et des lettres de Poznan D 4: 141-172.
134. and, 1964b. A study on the taxonomy, ecology and the geographical distribution of species of genus Idotea Fabricius (Isopoda, Crustacea) in Polish Baltic. II. Ecological and zoogeographical part. Bulletin de la societe des amis des sciences et des lettres de Poznan D 4: 173-199.
135. Theede, H., A. Ponat, K. Hiroki, and C. Schlieper. 1969. Studies on the resistance of marine bottom invertebrates to oxygen-deficiency and hydrogen sulphide. Marine Biology 2: 325-337.
136. Torn, K., D. Krause-Jensen, and G. Martin. 2006. Present and past depth distribution of bladderwrack (Fucus vesiculosus) in the Baltic Sea. Aquatic Botany 84: 53-62. (Pubitemid 41803090)
137. Toth, G. 2007. Screening for induced herbivore resistance in Swedish intertidal seaweeds. Marine Biology 151: 1597-1604. (Pubitemid 46682935)
138. Tuomi, J., V. Jormalainen, and H. Ilvessalo. 1988a. Does the aquatic isopod Idotea baltica minimize the survival costs of reproduction? Oikos 52: 245-249. (Pubitemid 19320467)
139. and, 1988b. Growth, food consumption and reproductive tactics of the aquatic isopod Idotea baltica. Annales Zoologici Fennici 25: 145-155.
140. Vesakoski, O., C. Boström, T. Ramsay, and V. Jormalainen. 2008. Sexual and local divergence in host exploitation in the marine herbivore Idotea baltica (Isopoda). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 367: 118-126.
141. Vetter, R.-A. H., H.-D. Franke, and F. Buchholz. 1999. Habitat-related differences in the responses to oxygen deficiencies in Idotea baltica and Idotea emarginata (Isopoda, Crustacea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 239: 259-272. (Pubitemid 29334046)
142. Vlasblom, A. G., S. J. Graafsma, and J. T. A. Verhoeven. 1977. Survival, osmoregulatory ability, and respiration of Idotea chelipes (Crustacea, Isopod) from lake Veere in different salinites and temperatures. Hydrobiologica 52: 33-38.
143. Voss, M., J. W. Dippner, C. Humborg, J. Hürdler, F. Korth, T. Neumann, G. Schernewski, and M. Venohr. 2011. History and scenarios of future development of Baltic Sea eutrophication. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 92: 307-322.
144. Wahrberg, R. 1930. Sveriges marina och Lacustra Isopoder, pp. 32-40. In, Göteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps-och Vitterhets-Samhälles Handlingar 5. Ser. B Matematiska och Naturvetenskapliga skrifter, Band 1, Nr. 9. Wettergren and Kerber, Göteborg.
145. Weslawski, J. M., J. Warzocha, J. Wiktor, J. Urbanski, K. Bradtke, L. Kyla, A. Tatrek, L. Kotwicki, and J. Piwowarczyk. 2009. Biological valorisation of the southern Baltic Sea (Polish Exclusive Economic Zone). Oceanologia 51: 415-435.
146. Widbom, B., and E. Westerlund. 2007. Bedömning av miljökvalitet i Gotlands kustvatten med utgångspunkt från mjukbotenfaunans sammansättning. Länsstyrelsen Gotlands Län. Rapporter om natur och miljö nr 2007: 12.
147. Wikström, S. A., and L. Kautsky. 2007. Structure and diversity of invertebrate communities in the presence and absence of canopy-forming Fucus vesiculosus in the Baltic Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 72: 168-176. (Pubitemid 46273910)
148. M. B. Steinarsdóttir, L. Kautsky, and H. Pavia. 2006. Increased chemical resistance explains low herbivore colonization of introduced seaweed. Oecologia 148: 593-601. (Pubitemid 43946117)
149. Williams, S. L., and M. H. Ruckelshaus. 1993. Effects of nitrogen availability and herbivory on eelgrass (Zostera marina) and epiphytes. Ecology 74: 904-918.
150. Worm, B., H. K. Lotze, and U. Sommer. 2000. Coastal food web structure, carbon storage, and nitrogen retention regulated by consumer pressure and nutrient loading. Limnology and Oceanography 45: 339-349. (Pubitemid 30152807)
151. Yun, H. Y., S. Rohde, K. Linnane, M. Wahl, and M. Molis. 2010. Seaweedmediated indirectinteraction between two species of meso-herbivores. Marine Ecology Progress Series 408: 47-53.
152. Zettler, M. L. 1999. Untersuchungen zum Makrozoobenthos des Breitlings (südliche Ostsee) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Crustacea. Rostock. Meeresbiologische Beiträge 7: 79-90.
153. and, 2000. Biologische Artenvielfalt in Küstengewässern der Ostsee am Beispiel der Krebse (Malacostraca). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Limnologie (DGL) Tagungsbericht 1999 (Rostock) Bd. 1: 414-418.
154. and, 2001. Some malacostracan crustacean assemblages in the southern and western Batlic Sea. Rostocker Meeresbiologische Beiträge 9: 127-143.
155. R. Bönsch, and F. Gosselck. 2000. Verbreitung des Makrozoobenthos in der Mecklenburger Bucht (südliche Ostsee)-rezent und im historischen Vergleich, pp. 1-144. In, Meereswissenschaftliche Berichte. Marine Science Reports. Institut für Ostseeforschung, Warnemünde.