Distribution and host plant preference of Idotea baltica (Pallas) (Crustacea: Isopoda) on shallow rocky shores in the central Baltic Sea

Sarsia

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-7

  Svensson, Per Andreas ^a   Malm, Torleif ^b   Engkvist, Roland ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Filamentous algae; Fucus; Grazing; Herbivory; Polysiphonia; Structuring factors

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CRUSTACEA; FUCUS; FUCUS SERRATUS; IDOTEA; IDOTEA BALTICA; INVERTEBRATA; ISOPODA; POLYSIPHONIA; POLYSIPHONIA FUCOIDES; RHODOPHYTA;

EID: 1642372485     PISSN: 00364827     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00364820310003217     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersson J, Dahl J, Johansson A, Karås P, Nilsson J, Sandström O, Svensson A. 2000. Lack of fish reproduction and decreasing fish stocks in the coastal waters of Kalmar County. Swedish National Board of Fishery. Report no. 2000. 5 p. (in Swedish).
2. Arrontes J. 1989. A new method for estimating digestive efficiency in herbivorous crustaceans. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, A, Comparative Physiology 94:133-136.
3. Arrontes J. 1990. Diet, food preference and digestive efficiency in intertidal isopods inhabiting macroalgae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 139:231-249.
4. Arrontes J, Anadon R. 1990. Distribution of intertidal isopods in relation to geographical changes in macroalgal cover in the Bay of Biscay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 70(2):283-293.
5. Borg Å, Pihl L, Wennhage H. 1997. Habitat choice by juvenile cod (Gadus morhua L.) on sandy bottoms with different vegetation types. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 51:197-212.
6. Boström C, Mattila J. 1999. The relative importance of food and shelter for seagrass-associated invertebrates: a latitudinal comparison of habitat choice by isopod grazers. Oecologia 120(1):162-170.
7. Branch GM. 1981. The biology of limpets: physical factors, energy flow, and ecological interactions. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 19:235-379.
8. Craig JF. 1977. Seasonal changes in the day and night activity of adult perch, Perca fluviatilis L. Journal of Fish Biology 11(2):161-166.
9. Cruz Rivera E, Hay ME. 2000. The effects of diet mixing on consumer fitness: macroalgae, epiphytes, and animal matter as food for marine amphipod. Oecologia 123(2):252-264.
10. Engkvist R, Malm T, Tobiasson S. 2000. Density dependent grazing effects of the isopod Idotea baltica Pallas on Fucus vesiculosus L in the Baltic Sea. Aquatic Ecology 34(3):253-260.
11. Eriksson LO. 1978. A laboratory study of diel and annual activity rhythms and vertical distribution in the perch, Perca fluviatilis, at the Arctic circle. Environmental Biology of Fishes 3(3):301-307.
12. Franke HD, Janke M. 1998. Mechanisms and consequences of intra-and interspecific interference competition in Idotea baltica (Pallas) and Idotea emarginata (Fabricius) (Crustacea: Isopoda): a laboratory study of possible proximate causes of habitat segregation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 227(1):1-21.
13. Holomuzki JR, Short TM. 1988. Habitat use and fish avoidance behaviors by the stream-dwelling isopod Lirceus fontinalis. Oikos 52(1):79-86.
14. Isaksson I, Pihl L, Van Montfrans J. 1994. Eutrophication-related changes in macrovegetation and foraging of young cod (Gadus morhua L.): a mesocosm experiment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 177(2):203-217.
15. Jansson A-M. 1974. Community structure modelling and simulation of the Cladophora ecosystem in the Baltic Sea. Contributions to Askö Laboratory, University of Stockholm,. 5 p.
16. Juhlin B. 1992. 20 years measurements along the Swedish coast with the coastguard's ships (54). The Swedish Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology, Department of Oceanography. Norrköping.. 67 p. (in Swedish).
17. Kangas P, Autio H, Hällfors G, Luther H, Niemi Å, Salemaa H. 1982. A general model of the decline of Fucus vesiculosus at Tvärminne south coast of Finland in 1977-81. Acta Botanica Fennica 118:1-27.
18. Kautsky H. 1988. Factors structuring phytobenthic communities in the Baltic Sea. PhD thesis, Department of Zoology, University of Stockholm.
19. Kiirikki M, Ruuskanen A. 1996. How does Fucus vesiculosus L survive ice scraping?. Botanica Marina 39:133-139.
20. Lassig J, Leppäkoski E. 1980. Benthic fauna of the Baltic Sea. Elsevier Oceanography series 30:254-265.
21. Lotze HK, Schramm W, Schories D, Worm B. 1999. Control of macro algal blooms at early developmental stages: Pilayella littoralis versus Enteromorpha spp. Oecologia 119:46-54.
22. Malm T, Engkvist R, Kautsky L. 1999. Grazing effects of two freshwater snails on juvenile Fucus vesiculosus in the Baltic Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 188:63-71.
23. Malm T, Kautsky L, Engkvist R. 2001. Reproduction, recruitment and geographical distribution of Fucus serratus L. in the Baltic Sea. Botanica Marina 44:101-108.
24. McBane CD, Croker RA. 1983. Animal-algal relationships of the amphipod Hyale nilssoni (Rathke) in the rocky intertidal. Journal of Crustacean Biology 3:592-601.
25. Menge BA. 2000. Top-down and bottom-up community regulation in marine rocky intertidal habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 250(1-2):257-289.
26. Merilaita S, Jormalainen V. 2000. Different roles of feeding and protection in diel microhabitat choice of sexes in Idotea baltica. Oecologia 122(4):445-451.
27. Nicotri ME. 1980. Factors involved in herbivore food preference. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 42:13-26.
28. Nilsson J, Engkvist R, Persson L-E. 2000. Restoration of coastal biotopes. Kalmar University. Dnr (1699-2/95 2063/96) Final Report 1996-1999 (in Swedish).
29. Norton TA, Hawkins SJ, Manley NL, Williams GA, Watson DC. 1990. Scraping a living: a review of littorinid grazing. Hydrobiologia 193:117-138.
30. Olovsson R. 2000. Predator-prey interactions between cod (Gadus morhua) and perch (Perca fluviatilis) and three crustaceans (Idotea baltica, Gammarus oceanicus, and Palaemon adspersus) in the Baltic Fucus communities. Masters thesis, Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Kalmar University, Sweden.
31. Pavia H, Carr H, Åberg P. 1999. Habitat and feeding preferences of crustacean mesoherbivores inhabiting the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. and its epiphytic macroalgae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 236:15-32.
32. Pihl L, Isaksson I, Wennhage H, Moksnes PO. 1995. Recent increases of filamentous algae in shallow Swedish bays: effects on the community structure of epibenthic fauna and fish. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 29(3-4):349-358.
33. Rasmussen E. 1973. Systematics and ecology of the Isefjord marine fauna (Denmark). Ophelia 11:156-157.
34. Rönnberg O, Lehto J, Haahtela I. 1985. Recent changes in the occurrence of Fucus vesiculosus in the Archipelago Sea. British Phycological Journal 20:87-104.
35. Sala E, Boudouresque CF, Harmelin-Vivien M. 1998. Fishing, trophic cascades, and the structure of algal assemblages: evaluation of an old but untested paradigm. Oikos 82(3):425-439.
36. Salemaa H. 1979. Ecology of Idotea spp. (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic. Ophelia 18(1):133-150.
37. Salemaa H. 1987. Herbivory and microhabitat preferences of Idotea spp. (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic Sea. Ophelia 27(1):1-16.
38. Vallin L, Nissling A, Westin L. 1999. Potential factors influencing reproductive success of Baltic cod, Gadus morhua: a review. Ambio 28(1):92-99.
39. Wærn M. 1952. Rocky-shore algae in the Öregrund archipelago. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
40. Wallentinus I. 1976. Environmental influences on benthic macrovegetation in the Trosa-Askö area Northern Baltic Proper. Contributions to Askö Laboratory, University of Stockholm,. 15 p.
41. Worm B, Lotze HK, Boström C, Engkvist R, Labanauskas V, Sommer U. 1999. Marine diversity shift linked to interactions among grazers, nutrients and propagule banks. Marine Ecology Progress Series 185:309-314.