Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis

Neuroradiology

Volumn 54, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 699-707

  Berg, Linda ^a,b   Neckelmann, Gesche ^a   Gjertsen, Øivind ^c   Hellum, Christian ^c,d   Johnsen, Lars G ^e   Eide, Geir E ^a,b   Espeland, Ansgar ^a,b  

^a HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^e TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Degeneration; Disc prosthesis; Lumbar spine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR DISK; LUMBAR DISK PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84862903361     PISSN: 00283940     EISSN: 14321920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-011-0963-y     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Berg S, Tullberg T, Branth B, Olerud C, Tropp H (2009) Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 18:1512-1519
2. van den Eerenbeemt KD, Ostelo RW, van Royen BJ, Peul WC, van Tulder MW (2010) Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 8:1262-1280
3. Hellum C, Johnsen LG, Storheim K, Nygaard ØP, Brox JI, Rossvoll I, RØ M, Sandvik L, Grundnes O, and the Norwegian Spine Study Group (2011) Surgery with disc prosthesis versus rehabilitation in patients with low back pain and degenerative disc: two year follow-up of randomised study. BMJ 342:d2786. doi:10.1136/bmj.d2786
4. Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, Vorwald P, Jabbour P, Bono CM, Goldfarb N, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS (2008) Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1701-1707
5. Park CK, Ryu KS, Jee WH (2008) Degenerative changes of discs and facet joints in lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: minimum two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1755-1761
6. Feinstein AR (1983) An additional basic science for clinical medicine: IV. The development of clinimetrics. Ann Intern Med 99:843-848
7. Jarvik JG, Deyo RA (2009) Moderate versus mediocre: the reliability of spine MR data interpretations. Radiology 250:15-17
8. Peterson CK, Gatterman B, Carter JC, Humphreys BK, Weibel A (2007) Inter- and intraexaminer reliability in identifying and classifying degenerative marrow (Modic) changes on lumbar spine magnetic resonance scans. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 30:85-90 (Pubitemid 46273675)
9. Arana E, Royuela A, Kovacs FM, Estremera A, Sarasíbar H, Amengual G, Galarraga I, Martínez C, Muriel A, Abraira V, Gil D Re MT el al, Zamora J, Campillo C (2010) Lumbar spine: agreement in the interpretation of 1.5-T MR images by using the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification form. Radiology 254:809-817
10. Carrino JA, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Carragee EJ, Kaiser J, Grove MR, Blood E, Pearson LH, Weinstein JN, Herzog R (2009) Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings. Radiology 250:161-170
11. Jensen TS, Sorensen JS, Kjaer P (2007) Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of vertebral endplate signal (modic) changes in the lumbar spine: the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification. Acta Radiol 48:748-754 (Pubitemid 47338642)
12. Kovacs FM, Royuela A, Jensen TS, Estremera A, Amengual G, Muriel A, Galarraga I, Martínez C, Arana E, Sarasíbar H, Salgado RM, Abraira V, López O, Campillo C, del Real MT, Zamora J (2009) Agreement in the interpretation of magnetic resonance images of the lumbar spine. Acta Radiol 50:497-506
13. Smith BM, Hurwitz EL, Solsberg D, Rubinstein D, Corenman DS, Dwyer AP, Kleiner J (1998) Interobserver reliability of detecting lumbar intervertebral disc high-intensity zone on magnetic resonance imaging and association of high-intensity zone with pain and anular disruption. Spine 23:2074-2080 (Pubitemid 28485122)
14. Aprill C, Bogduk N (1992) High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 65:361-369
15. Solgaard Sorensen J, Kjaer P, Jensen ST, Andersen P (2006) Lowfield magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: reliability of qualitative evaluation of disc and muscle parameters. Acta Radiol 47:947-953 (Pubitemid 44673501)
16. Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Carragee E, Carrino JA, Kaiser J, Sequeiros RT, Lecomte AR, Grove MR, Blood EA, Pearson LH, Herzog R, Weinstein JN (2008) Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging readings for lumbar disc herniation in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:991-998 (Pubitemid 351572291)
17. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Boos N, Hodler J (1999) MR imaging and CT in osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joints. Skeletal Radiol 28:215-219 (Pubitemid 29251140)
18. Stieber J, Quirno M, Cunningham M, Errico TJ, Bendo JA (2009) The reliability of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging grading of lumbar facet arthropathy in total disc replacement patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E833-E840
19. Fardon DF (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:461-462
20. Modic MT, Ross JS (2007) Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology 245:43-61 (Pubitemid 47417788)
21. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR (1988) Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 166:193-199 (Pubitemid 18027070)
22. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, Raininko R, Viikari-Juntura E, Lamminen A (2000) Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:487-492
23. Raininko R, Manninen H, Battie MC, Gibbons LE, Gill K, Fisher LD (1995) Observer variability in the assessment of disc degeneration on magnetic resonance images of the lumbar and thoracic spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1029-1035
24. Videman T, Battie MC, Gibbons LE, Maravilla K, Manninen H, Kaprio J (2003) Associations between back pain history and lumbar MRI findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:582-588
25. Masharawi Y, Kjaer P, Bendix T, Manniche C, Wedderkopp N, Sorensen JS, Peled N, Jensen TS (2008) The reproducibility of quantitative measurements in lumbar magnetic resonance imaging of children from the general population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2094-2100
26. Fujiwara A, Tamai K, Yamato M, An HS, Yoshida H, Saotome K, Kurihashi A (1999) The relationship between facet joint osteoarthritis and disc degeneration of the lumbar spine: an MRI study. Eur Spine J 8:396-401 (Pubitemid 29513720)
27. Sim J, Wright CC (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85:257-268 (Pubitemid 40333545)
28. Altman D (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, New York
29. Ker M (1991) Issues in the use of kappa. Invest Radiol 126:78-83
30. Robinson PJ (1997) Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Rontgen image. Br J Radiol 70:1085-1098 (Pubitemid 27504361)
31. Jensen RK, Leboeuf-Yde C (2011) Is the presence of Modic changes associated with the outcomes of different treatments? A systematic critical review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:183
32. Endean A, Palmer KT, Coggon D (2011) Potential of magnetic resonance imaging findings to refine case definition for mechanical low back pain in epidemiological studies: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:160-169
33. Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, Spindler MF, McAuley JH, Laslett M, Bogduk N (2007) Systematic review of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain. Eur Spine J 16:1539-1350