Construction project cash flow planning using the pareto optimality efficiency network model

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 510-519

  Jiang, Aiyin ^a   Issa, Raja R A ^b   Malek, Maged ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cash flow planning; Multiple objective; Network model; Pareto optimality

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONSTRAINT; CASH FLOW; CASH FLOW MANAGEMENT; CASH-FLOW FORECASTS; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; DECISION MAKING TOOL; FINANCIAL MARKET; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVE; NETWORK MODELS; PARETO-OPTIMALITY; PROJECT COST; REAL-WORLD PROBLEM; REASONABLE ACCURACY;

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; PROFITABILITY;

PARETO PRINCIPLE;

EID: 84862892224     PISSN: 13923730     EISSN: 18223605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2011.604537     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barbosa, P. S. F.; Pimentel, P. R. 2001. A linear programming model for cash flow management in the Brazilian construction industry, Construction Management and Economics 19(5): 469-479. (Pubitemid 32635988)
2. Blyth, K.; Kaka, A. 2006. A novel multiple linear regression model for forecasting S-curves, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 13(1): 82-95. doi:10.1108/09699980610646511 (Pubitemid 43089137)
3. Chiu, H. N.; Tsai, D. M. 2002. An efficient search procedure for the resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem with discounted cash flows, Construction Management and Economics 20(1): 55-66. doi:10.1080/ 01446190110089718 (Pubitemid 34057506)
4. Elazouni, A. M.; Gab-Allah, A. A. 2004. Finance-based scheduling of construction projects using integer programming, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 130(1): 15-24. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004) 130:1(15) (Pubitemid 40265401)
5. Elazouni, A. M.; Metwally, F. G. 2005. Finance-based scheduling: tool to maximize project profit using improved genetic algorithms, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 131(4): 400-412. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:4(400) (Pubitemid 40430136)
6. Gates, M.; Scarpa, A. 1979. Preliminary cumulative cash flow analysis, Cost Engineering 21(6): 243-249.
7. Hsu, K. 2003. Estimation of a double S-curve model, AACE International Transactions IT13.1- IT13.5.
8. Kaka, A. P.; Price, A. D. F. 1991. Net cashflow models: Are they reliable?, Construction Management and Economics 9(3): 291-308. doi:10.1080/01446199100000023
9. Kaka, A. P.; Price, A. D. F. 1993. Modelling standard cost commitment curves for contractors cash flow forecasting, Construction Management and Economics 11(4): 271-283. doi:10.1080/01446199300000027
10. Kaka, A. P. 1996. Towards more flexible and accurate cash flow forecasting, Construction Management and Economics 14(1): 35-44. doi:10.1080/01446199600000005 (Pubitemid 126662944)
11. Karshenas, S.; Haber, D. 1990. Economic optimization of construction project scheduling, Construction Management and Economics 8 (2): 135-146.
12. Liu, S.-S.; Wang, C.-J. 2008. Resource-constrained construction project scheduling model for profit maximization considering cash flow, Automation in Construction 17(8): 966-974. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2008.04.006
13. Liu, S.-S.; Wang, C.-J. 2009. Two-stage profit optimization model for linear scheduling problems considering cash flow, Construction Management and Economics 27(11): 1023-1037. doi:10.1080/01446190903233111
14. Liu, S.-S.; Wang, C.-J. 2010. Profit optimization for multiple scheduling problems considering cash flow, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 136(12): 1268-1278. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000235
15. Navon, R. 1995. Resource-based model for automatic cash-flow forecasting, Construction Management and Economics 13(6): 501-510. doi:10.1080/ 01446199500000058
16. Navon, R. 1996. Company-level cash-flow management, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 122(1): 22-29. doi:10.1061/(ASCE) 0733-9364(1996)122:1(22)
17. Park, H. K.; Han, S. H.; Russell, J. S. 2005. Cash flow forecasting model for general contractors using moving weights of cost categories, Journal of Management in Engineering ASCE 21(4): 164-172. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005) 21:4(164) (Pubitemid 41441335)
18. th Annual Trans., American Association of Cost Engineers, Morgantown, VA, R5.1-R5.14.