The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure's semistructured interview: Its applicability to lumbar spinal fusion patients. A prospective randomized clinical study

European Spine Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 115-121

  Oestergaard, Lisa Gregersen ^a   Maribo, Thomas ^a   Bünger, Cody Erik ^a   Christensen, Finn Bjarke ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living (ADL); Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM); Lumbar spinal fusion; Occupational therapy; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CANADIAN OCCUPATIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SPINE FUSION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISPLACEMENT; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862891985     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1957-5     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Andersen T, Christensen FB, Egund N et al (2009) The effect of electrical stimulation on lumbar spinal fusion in older patients: a randomized, controlled, multi-center trial: part 2: fusion rates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(21):2248-2253
2. Andrew WD, Jane KS, Sebastian JP, Rajkumar S, Bennetts K (2004) Performance problems of patients with chronic low-back pain and the measurement of patient-centered outcome. Spine 29(1):87-93
3. Andrew WD, Jane KS, Sebastian JP, Rajkumar S, Bennetts K (2004) Performance problems of patients with chronic low-back pain and the measurement of patient-centered outcome. Spine 29(1):87-93
4. Budge G (1997) An evaluation of the occupational therapy for spine fusion hip spica patients. Br J Occup Ther 60(8):365-369
5. Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S et al (2004) The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther 71(4):210-222
6. Christensen FB (2004) Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and post-operative reha-bilitation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 75(313):2-43
7. Christensen FB, Laurberg I, Bunger CE (2003) Importance of the back-cafe concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study with a 2-year follow-up. Spine 28(23):2561-2569
8. Dagfinrud H, Kjeken I, Mowinckel P, Hagen KB, Kvien TK (2005) Impact of functional impairment in ankylosing spondylitis: impairment, activity limitation, and participation restrictions. J Rheumatol 32(3):516-523
9. Lawlis GF, Cuencas R, Selby D, McCoy CE (1989) The development of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire. An assessment of the impact of spinal pain on behavior. Spine 14(5):511-516
10. Lawlis GF, Cuencas R, Selby D, McCoy CE (1989) The devel-opment of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire. An assessment of the impact of spinal pain on behavior. Spine 14(5):511-516
11. McColl MA, Law M, Baptiste S et al (2005) Targeted applica-tions of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 72(5):298-300
12. McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, Doubt L, Law M (2000) Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 67(1):22-30
13. Nielsen PR, Jorgensen LD, Dahl B, Pedersen T, Tonnesen H (2010) Pre-habilitation and early rehabilitation after spinal sur-gery: randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil 24(2):137-148
14. Pollock N (1993) Client-centered assessment. Am J Occup Ther 47(4):298-301
15. Sogaard R, Bunger CE, Laurberg I, Christensen FB (2008) Cost-effectiveness evaluation of an RCT in rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a low-cost, behavioural approach is cost-effective over individual exercise therapy. Eur Spine J 17(2):262-271
16. Toomey M, Nicholson D, Carswell A (2002) The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 62(5):242-249
17. Videbaek TS, Christensen FB, Soegaard R et al (2006) Circum-ferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instru-mented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine 31(25):2875-2880
18. Wressle E, Eeg-Olofsson AM, Marcusson J, Henriksson C (2002) Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure. J Rehabil Med 34(1):5-11
19. Wressle E, Eeg-Olofsson AM, Marcusson J, Henriksson C (2002) Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure. J Rehabil Med 34(1):5-11
20. Wressle E, Eeg-Olofsson AM, Marcusson J, Henriksson C (2002) Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure. J Rehabil Med 34(1):5-11
21. Wressle E, Lindstrand J, Neher M, Marcusson J, Henriksson C (2003) The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome measure and team tool in a day treatment programme. Disabil Rehabil 25(10):497-506
22. Wressle E, Marcusson J, Henriksson C (2002) Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure\-Swedish version. Can J Occup Ther 69(1):40-48