Evolutionary correlation between male substances and female remating frequency in a seed beetle

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 715-722

  Yamane, Takashi ^a   Miyatake, Takahisa ^b  

^a NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

^b OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

coevolution; female choice; female remating; receptivity inhibiting substance; seminal fluids; sperm competition

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; COEVOLUTION; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; INHIBITION; MATE CHOICE; SPERM COMPETITION;

BRUCHINAE; CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS; COLEOPTERA; VIGNA ANGULARIS;

EID: 84862891108     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ars017     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
2. Andrés JA, Arnqvist G. 2001. Genetic divergence of the seminal signalreceptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 268:399-405. (Pubitemid 32206810)
3. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav. 60:145-264.
4. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
5. Birkhead TR. 2000. Promiscuity: an evolutionary history of sperm competition and sexual conflict. London: Faber & Faber.
6. Brown DV, Eady PE. 2001. Functional incompatibility between the fertilization systems of two allopatric populations of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Evolution. 55:2257-2262. (Pubitemid 34045557)
7. Blyth JE, Gilburn AS. 2006. Extreme promiscuity in a mating system dominated. J Insect Behav. 19:447-455. (Pubitemid 44627793)
8. Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol. 18:41-47. (Pubitemid 36048852)
9. Chapman T, Choffat Y, Lucas WY, Kubli E, Partridge L. 1996. Lack of response to SP results in increased cost of mating in dunce Drosophila melanogaster females. J Insect Physiol. 42:1007-1015. (Pubitemid 27521819)
10. Chapman T, Liddle LF, Kalb JM, Wolfner MF, Partridge L. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature. 373:241-244.
11. Chapman T, Miyatake T, Smith H, Partridge L. 1998. Interactions of mating, egg production and death rates in Mediterranean fruitfly, Ceratitis capitata females. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 265:1879-1894. (Pubitemid 28477376)
12. Cordero C, Eberhard WG. 2003. Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research. J Evol Biol. 16:1-6. (Pubitemid 36108126)
13. Cordero C, Eberhard WG. 2005. Interaction between sexually antagonistic selection and mate choice in the evolution of female responses to male traits. Evol Ecol. 19:111-122. (Pubitemid 41279641)
14. Crudgington H, Siva-Jothy M. 2000. Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature. 407:855-856.
15. Eady PE, Hamilton L, Lyons RE. 2007. Copulation, genital damage and early death in Callosobruchus maculatus. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 274:247-252. (Pubitemid 47055481)
16. Eady PE, Wilson N, Jackson M. 2000. Copulating with multiple mates enhances female fecundity but not egg-to-adult survival in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Evolution. 54:2161-2165. (Pubitemid 32113843)
17. Eberhard WG. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
18. Edvardsson M. 2007. Female Callosobruchus maculatus mate when they are thirsty: resource-rich ejaculates as mating effort in a beetle. Anim Behav. 74:183-188. (Pubitemid 47247637)
19. Firman RC, Simmons LW. 2008. The frequency of multiple paternity predicts variation in testes size among island populations of house mice. J Evol Biol. 21:1524-1533.
20. Fitze PS, Le Galliard J-F, Federici P, Richard M, Clobert J. 2005. Conflict over multiple-partner mating between males and females of the polygynandrous common lizards. Evolution. 59:2451-2459. (Pubitemid 41752657)
21. Fleischmann I, Cotton B, Choffat Y, Spengler M, Kubli E. 2001. Mushroom bodies and post-mating behaviors of Drosophila melanogaster females. J Neurogenet. 15:117-144. (Pubitemid 34024190)
22. Gavrilets S, Arnqvist G, Friberg U. 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 268:531-539. (Pubitemid 32250790)
23. Gay L, Eady PE, Vasudev R, Hosken D, Tregenza T. 2009. Costly sexual harassment in a beetle. Physiol Entomol. 34:86-92.
24. Gillott C. 1988. Arthropoda-Insecta. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG, editors. Reproductive biology of invertebrates, Vol. III. Accessory sex glands. New York: Wiley. p. 319-471.
25. Gillott C. 2003. Male accessory gland secretions: modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. Annu Rev Entomol. 48:163-184. (Pubitemid 37365390)
26. Gwynne DT. 2008. Sexual conflict over nuptial gifts in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 53:83-101. (Pubitemid 351341932)
27. Harano T, Miyatake T. 2005. Heritable variation in polyandry in Callosobruchus chinensis. Anim Behav. 70:299-304. (Pubitemid 40968682)
28. Harano T, Miyatake T. 2007. Interpopulation variation in female remating is attributable to female and male effects in Callosobruchus chinensis. J Ethol. 25:49-55. (Pubitemid 46122297)
29. Harano T, Yasui Y, Miyatake T. 2006. Direct effects of polyandry on female fitness in Callosobruchus chinensis. Anim Behav. 71:539-548. (Pubitemid 43327348)
30. Holland B, Rice WR. 1998. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution. 52:1-7. (Pubitemid 28195144)
31. Hosken DJ, Stockley P, Tregenza T, Wedell N. 2009. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes. Annu Rev Entomol. 54:361-378.
32. Hotzy C, Arnqvist G. 2009. Sperm competition favors harmful males in seed beetles. Curr Biol. 19:404-407.
33. Jennions MD, Petrie M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev. 75:21-64. (Pubitemid 30135849)
34. Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Morley J. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 270:653-664. (Pubitemid 36359742)
35. Lee PLM, Hays GC. 2004. Polyandry in a marine turtle: females make the best of a bad job. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101: 6530-6535. (Pubitemid 38586008)
36. Lessells CM. 2006. The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 361:301-317. (Pubitemid 44870116)
37. McNamara KB, Elgar MA, Brown R, Jones TM. 2008. Paternity costs from polyandry compensated by increased fecundity in the hide beetle. Behav Ecol. 19:433-440.
38. Miyatake T, Chapman T, Partridge L. 1999. Mating-induced inhibition of remating in female Mediterranean fruit flies Ceratitis capitata. J Insect Physiol. 45:1021-1028. (Pubitemid 29390145)
39. Miyatake T, Matsumura F. 2004. Intra-specific variation in female remating in Callosobruchus chinensis and C. maculatus. J Insect Physiol. 50:403-408. (Pubitemid 38583499)
40. Møller AP, Jennions MD. 2001. How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften. 88:401-415.
41. Nilsson T, Fricke C, Arnqvist G. 2003. The effects of male and female genotype on variance in male fertilization success in the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 53:227-233. (Pubitemid 36708354)
42. Pai A, Feil S, Yan G. 2007. Variation in polyandry and its fitness consequences among populations of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Evol Ecol. 21:687-702. (Pubitemid 47305468)
43. Parker GA. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev. 45:525-567.
44. Parker GA. 2006. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philos Trans R Soc B. 361:235-259. (Pubitemid 44870111)
45. Rice WR. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution. 43:223-225.
46. Ridley M. 1988. Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol Rev. 63:509-549.
47. Rönn J, Katvala M, Arnqvist G. 2007. Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:10921-10925. (Pubitemid 47175202)
48. Sakurai G, Kasuya E. 2008a. Different female mating rates in different populations do not reflect the benefits the females gain from polyandry in the adzuki bean beetle. J Ethol. 26:93-98.
49. Sakurai G, Kasuya E. 2008b. The costs of harassment in the adzuki bean beetle. Anim Behav. 75:1367-1373. (Pubitemid 351389428)
50. SAS Institute. 2007. JMP7. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
51. Savalli UM, Fox CW. 1999. The effect of male mating history on paternal investment, fecundity and female remating in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Funct Ecol. 13:169-177. (Pubitemid 29266990)
52. Sgró CM, Chapman T, Partridge L. 1998. Sex-specific selection on time to remate in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav. 56: 1267-1278. (Pubitemid 28548070)
53. Simmons LW. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in insects. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
54. Simmons LW. 2003. The evolution of polyandry: patterns of genotypic variation in female mating frequency, male fertilization success and a test of the sexy-sperm hypothesis. J Evol Biol. 16:624-634. (Pubitemid 36832261)
55. Simmons LW. 2005. The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 36:125-146. (Pubitemid 43068853)
56. Solymar BD, Cade WH. 1990. Heritable variation for female mating frequency in field crickets, Gryllus integer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 26:73-76.
57. Thornhill R, Alcock J. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
58. Torres-Vila LM, Gragera J, Rodríguez-Molina MC, Stockel J. 2002. Heritable variation for female remating in Lobesia botrana, a usually monandrous moth. Anim Behav. 64:899-907. (Pubitemid 36784813)
59. Torres-Vila LM, Rodríguez-Molina MC, Gragera J, Bielza-Lino P. 2001. Polyandry in Lepidoptera: a heritable trait in Spodoptera exigua Hübner. Heredity. 86:177-183. (Pubitemid 32540485)
60. Tseng HF, Yang RL, Lin C, Horng SB. 2007. The function of multiple mating in oviposition and egg maturation in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Physiol Entomol. 32:150-156. (Pubitemid 46699558)
61. Ursprung C, den Hollander M, Gwynne DT. 2009. Female seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus, remate for male-supplied water rather than ejaculate nutrition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 63:781-788.
62. Välimäki P, Kaitala A. 2010. Properties of male ejaculates do not generate geographical variation in female mating tactics in a butterfly Pieris napi. Anim Behav. 79:1173-1179.
63. Wagner WE Jr, Kelley RJ, Tucker KR, Harper CJ. 2001. Females receive a life-span benefit from male ejaculates in a field cricket. Evolution. 55:994-1001. (Pubitemid 32550567)
64. Wedell N. 2005. Female receptivity in butterflies and moths. J Exp Biol. 208:3433-3440. (Pubitemid 41463265)
65. Wedell N, Wiklund C, Bergström J. 2009. Coevolution of non-fertile sperm and female receptivity in a butterfly. Biol Lett. 5:678-681.
66. Wiklund C, Kaitala A, Lindfors V, Abenius J. 1993. Polyandry and its effects on female reproduction in the green-veined white betterfly (Pieris napi L.). Behav Evol Sociobiol. 33:25-33. (Pubitemid 24407813)
67. Wilson N, Tufton TJ, Eady PE. 1999. The effect of single, double, and triple mating on the lifetime fecundity of Callosobruchus analis and Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J Insect Behav. 12:295-306. (Pubitemid 29347829)
68. Wolfner MF. 1997. Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 27:179-192. (Pubitemid 27120404)
69. Yamane T, Kimura Y, Katsuhara M, Miyatake T. 2008. Female mating receptivity inhibited by injection of male-derived extracts in Callosobruchus chinensis. J Insect Physiol. 54:501-507.
70. Yamane T, Kimura Y, Miyatake T. 2008. Female mating receptivity after injection of male-derived extracts in Callosobruchus maculatus. J Insect Physiol. 54:1522-1527.
71. Yamane T, Miyatake T. 2010a. Reduced female mating receptivity and activation of oviposition in two Callosobruchus species due to injection of biogenic amines. J Insect Physiol. 56:271-276.
72. Yamane T, Miyatake T. 2010b. Common function of male-derived extracts that inhibit female mating receptivity and its consequence after inter-specific mating in two Callosobruchus species. J Insect Physiol. 56:1565-1571.
73. Yamane T, Miyatake T. 2010c. Induction of oviposition by injection of male-derived extracts in two Callosobruchus species. J Insect Physiol. 56:1783-1788.
74. Yanagi S, Miyatake T. 2003. Costs of mating and egg production in female Callosobruchus chinensis. J Insect Physiol. 49:823-827. (Pubitemid 37084124)