Feasibility of a knowledge translation CME program: Courriels Cochrane

Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 134-141

  Pluye, Pierre ^a   Grad, Roland ^a   Granikov, Vera ^a   Theriault, Guyléne ^b   Frémont, Pierre ^c   Burnand, Bernard ^d   Mercer, Jay ^e   Marlow, Bernard ^f   Arroll, Bruce ^g   Luconi, Francesca ^h   Légaré, France ^c   Labrecque, Michel ^c   Ladouceur, Roger ⁱ   Bouthillier, France ^a   Sridhar, Soumya Bindiganavile ^a   Moscovici, Jonathan ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^f College of Family Physicians of Canada ^*  (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^h MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

ⁱ Direction de l'Amélioration de l'Exercice   (Canada)

Author keywords

Continuing medical education; E learning; E mail alert; Feasibility; Information assessment method; Information behavior; Information use; Knowledge translation; Physicians; Reflective learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; COOPERATION; E-MAIL; EDUCATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LITERATURE; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; ELECTRONIC MAIL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; QUEBEC; QUESTIONNAIRES; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84862887212     PISSN: 08941912     EISSN: 1554558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chp.21136     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Perrier L, Mrklas K, Shepperd S, Dobbins M, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews in clinical decision-making: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;26(4):419-426.
2. Grad RM. Cochrane reviews not so useful. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:1436.
3. Badgett R. Why would physicians undervalue reviews by the Cochrane Collaboration? J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(5):449-454.
4. Strauss SE, Sackett DL. Reply to Ebell's article 'Putting computer-based evidence in the hands of clinicians.' JAMA. 1999; 281:1171-1172.
5. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ. 2009;181(3-4):165-168.
6. Glenton C, Underland V, Kho M, Pennick V, Oxman A. Summaries of findings, descriptions of interventions, and information about adverse effects would make reviews more informative. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(8):770-778.
7. Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ. 2008; 336(7659):1472-1474.
8. Grimshaw J. So what has the Cochrane Collaboration ever done for us? A report card on the first 10 years. CMAJ. 2004;171(171):747-749.
9. Pluye P, Grad RM, Granikov V, Jagosh J, Leung K. Evaluation of email alerts in practice: Part 1-Review of the literature on clinical emailing channels. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(6):1227-1235.
10. Davies S, Cleave-Hogg D. Continuing medical education should be offered by both e-mail and regular mail: a survey of Ontario anesthesiologists. Can J Anaesth. 2004;51(5):444-448.
11. Johnson E. Design and evaluation of a personal digital assistant based alerting service for clinicians. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004; 92(4):438-444.
12. Mukohara K, Schwartz MD. Electronic delivery of research summaries for academic generalist doctors: a randomised trial of an educational intervention. Med Educ. 2005; 39:402-409.
13. Haynes RB, Holland J, Cotoi C, et al. McMaster plus: a cluster randomized clinical trial of an intervention to accelerate clinical use of evidence-based information from digital libraries. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(6):593-600.
14. Grad RM, Pluye P, Johnson-Lafleur J, et al. Do family physicians retrieve synopses of clinical research previously read as email alerts? J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e101.
15. Grad R, Pluye P, Mercer J, et al. Impact of research-based synopses delivered as daily email: a prospective observational study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(2):240-245.
16. Pohl A. (2007) Modes of administration of antibiotics for symptomatic severe urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4: doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003237.pub2.
17. Pluye P, Grad RM, Johnson-Lafleur J, et al. Evaluation of email alerts in practice: Part 2-Validation of the Information Assessment Method (IAM). J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(6):1236-1243.
18. Saracevic T, Kantor PB. Studying the value of library and information services. Part 1. Establishing a theoretical framework. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1997;48(48):527-542.
19. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-3191.
20. Leung K, Pluye P, Grad R, Weston C. A reflective learning framework to evaluate CME effects on practice reflection. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010;30(2):78-88.
21. Moore DE, Green JS, Gallis HA. Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29(1):1-15.
22. Schoen MJ, Tipton EF, Houston TK, et al. Characteristics that predict physician participation in a web-based CME activity: the MI-plus study. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29(4):246-253.
23. Kuh GD, Cruce TM, Shoup R, Kinzie J, Gonyea RM. Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. J Higher Educ. 2008;79(5):540-563.
24. Kerfoot B, Brotschi E. Online spaced education to teach urology to medical students: a multi-institutional randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2009;197(1):89-95.
25. Wrench J, Punyanunt-Carter N. The relationship between computer-mediated-communication competence, apprehension, self-efficacy, perceived confidence, and social presence. Southern Comm J. 2007;72(4):355-378.
26. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1094-1102.
27. Wutoh R, Boren S, Balas E. eLearning: A review of Internet-based continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004;24(1):20-30.
28. Tanna GV, Sood MM, Schiff J, Schwartz D, Naimark D. Do e-mail alerts of new research increase knowledge translation? A "nephrology now" randomized control trial. Acad Med. 2011;86(86):132-138.