A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis

Minerva

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 149-167

  Tyfield, David ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crisis; Cultural political economy; Governmentality; Science technology policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862886036     PISSN: 00264695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11024-012-9201-y     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
2. Beck, Ulrich, and Natan Sznaider. 2006. Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda. British Journal of Sociology 57(1): 1-25.
3. Bozeman, Barry, and Daniel Sarewitz. 2010. Public value mapping and science policy evaluation. Minerva 49(1): 1-23.
4. Brown, Mark B. 2009. Science in democracy. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
5. Bruno, Isabelle. 2009. The "indefinite discipline" of competitiveness benchmarking as a neoliberal technology of government. Minerva 47(3): 261-280.
6. Chesbrough, Henry. 2005. Open innovation. Cambridge (MA): Harvard Business School Press.
7. Collins, Harry, and Robert Evans. 2002. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Sciences 32(2): 235-296.
8. Crouch, Colin. 2011. The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity.
9. Dean, Mitchell. 2010. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
10. Debray, Regis. 1973. Prison writings. London: Allen Lane.
11. Dryzek, John. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Durant, Darrin. 2011. Models of democracy in social studies of science. Social Studies of Science 41(5): 691-714.
13. European Commission. 2008. Commission Recommendation of 07/02/2008 on a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research. Brussels: EC.
14. Ezrahi, Yaron. 1990. The descent of Icarus. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
15. Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Fischer, Frank. 2008. Democracy and expertise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978-1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Gieryn, Thomas. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Gläser, Jochen. 2010. From governance to authority relations. In Reconfiguring Knowledge Production, eds. Richard Whitley, Jochen Gläser, and Lars Engwall, 357-370. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Hagendijk, Rob. 2004. The public understanding of science and public participation in regulated worlds. Minerva 42(1): 41-59.
21. Hartmann, Niklas. 2011. Governmentality and 'science in society'. Unpublished MA dissertation, Lancaster University.
22. Hedgecoe, Adam. 2011. 'Dual use of biotechnology', Presentation at Cesagen Symposium on International Governance of Science, Wales Millennium Centre, Cardiff, 26 July.
23. Irwin, Alan. 2006. The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299-320.
24. Irwin, Alan, and Brian Wynne. 1996. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.). 2004. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.
26. Jessop, Bob. 2002. The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity.
27. Jessop, Bob. 2010. Cultural political economy and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies 3(3-4): 336-356.
28. Jessop, Bob. Forthcoming. Beyond finance-dominated capitalism? Critical reflections on growth regimes, Capital & Class.
29. Joly, Pierre-Benoît, Arie Rip, and Michel Callon. 2010. Reinventing innovation. In Governance and Innovation, eds. Maarten Arentsen, Wouter van Rossum, and Bert Steenge, 19-32. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
30. Klein, Naomi. 2007. The shock doctrine. London: Penguin.
31. Lemke, Thomas. 2011. Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Boulder (CO) and London: Paradigm Publishers.
32. Levidow, Les, Joseph Murphy, and Susan Carr. 2007. Recasting "substantial equivalence": Transatlantic governance of GM food. Science, Technology and Human Values 32: 26-64.
33. Lezaun, Javier, and Linda Soneryd. 2007. Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science 16: 279-297.
34. Lindblom, Charles. 1979. Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review 39(6): 517-526.
35. Lothian, Tamara, and Roberto Mangabeira Unger. 2011. Crisis, slump, superstition and recovery. Working Paper. http://www. law. harvard. edu/faculty/unger/english/pdfs/JOINT_PIECE. pdf. Accessed 12 April 2012.
36. Mirowski, Philip. 2011a. ScienceMart: Privatizing American science. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
37. Mirowski, Philip 2011b. Trial by Twitter: New Horizons in Neoliberal Peer Review. Presentation to the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S) Annual Conference, Cleveland (OH), 6 November.
38. Mirowski, Philip, and Dieter Plehwe (eds.). 2009. The road from Mont Pélérin. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
39. Mirowski, Philip, and Esther-Mirjam Sent. 2008. The commercialization of science and the response of STS. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, eds. Edward Hackett, Judy Wacjman, Olga Amsterdamska, and Michael Lynch, 635-690. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
40. Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science. Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Ockwell, David. 2008. Energy and economic growth: Grounding our understanding in physical reality. Energy Policy 36: 4600-4604.
42. Pagano, Ugo, and Maria Alessandra Rossi. 2009. The crash of the knowledge economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics 33: 665-683.
43. Pellizzoni, Luigi. 2011. Governing through disorder: Neoliberal environmental governance and social theory. Global Environmental Change 21: 795-803.
44. Pestre, Dominique. 2009. Understanding the forms of government in today's liberal and democratic societies: An introduction. Minerva 47(3): 243-260.
45. Polanyi, Michael. 1962. The republic of science: It's political and economic theory. Minerva 1(1): 54-73.
46. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1976. Capitalism, socialism and democracy, 5th ed. London: Allen & Unwin.
47. Stirling, Andy. 2005. Opening up or closing down: Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. In Science, Citizenship and Globalisation, eds. Melissa Leach, Ian Scoones, and Brian Wynne, 218-231. London: Zed.
48. Stirling, Andy. 2009. Direction, distribution and diversity! Pluralising progress in innovation, sustainability and development. STEPS Working Paper 32. Brighton: STEPS Centre.
49. Sum, Ngai-Ling, and Bob Jessop. 2009. Towards a cultural political economy. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
50. Thorpe, Charles. 2008. Political theory in science and technology studies. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, eds. Edward Hackett, Judy Wacjman, Olga Amsterdamska, and Michael Lynch, 63-82. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
51. Tlili, Anwar, and Emily Dawson. 2010. Mediating science and society in the EU and UK: From information-transmission to deliberative democracy? Minerva 48(4): 429-461.
52. Tyfield, David, Jun Jin, and Tyler Rooker. 2010. Game-changing China. London: NESTA.
53. Tyfield, David. 2011. Food systems transitions and disruptive low carbon innovation. Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 3701-3706.
54. Tyfield, David. 2012a. The economics of science: A critical realist overview (Volume 1). Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
55. Tyfield, David. 2012b. The economics of science: A critical realist overview (Volume 2). Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
56. von Hippel, Eric. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
57. Whitley, Richard. 2010. Reconfiguring the public sciences. In Reconfiguring Knowledge Production, eds. Richard Whitley, Jochen Gläser, and Lars Engwall, 3-48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Wilsdon, James, and Rebecca Willis. 2004. See-through science. London: Demos.
59. Wynne, Brian. 2008. Elephants in the rooms where publics encounter "science"?: A response to Durant. Public Understanding of Science 17: 21-33.
60. Wynne, Brian, and Ulrike Felt. 2007. Taking European knowledge society seriously. Science Economy and Society Directorate EUR 22700, Brussels: D-G Research.