Relationship between the modified Rankin Scale and the Barthel Index in the process of functional recovery after stroke

NeuroRehabilitation

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 315-322

  Cioncoloni, D ^a,b   Piu, P ^b   Tassi, R ^a   Acampa, M ^a   Guideri, F ^a   Taddei, S ^a   Bielli, S ^a   Martini, G ^a   Mazzocchio, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Barthel Index; functional recovery; modified Rankin Scale; physiotherapy; prognosis; rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CONVALESCENCE; DISABILITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RANKIN SCALE; STROKE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STROKE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84862877162     PISSN: 10538135     EISSN: 18786448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-2012-0761     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Queen TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR, Reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale: a Systematic Review, Stroke 40 (2009), 3393-3395.
2. Collin C,WadeDT,Davis S,HorneV, The BarthelADL Index: a reliability Study, International disability Study 10(2) (1988), 61-63.
3. Van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, Van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients, Stroke 19(5) (1988), 604-607.
4. D'Olhaberriague L, Litvan I, Mitsias P, Mansbach HH, A reappraisal of reliability and validity studies in stroke, stroke 27(12) (1996), 2331-2336.
5. De Haan R, Limburg M, Schuling J, Broeshart J, Jankers L, Van Zuylen P, Clinimetric evaluation of the Barthel Index, a measure of limitation in daily activities, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 137(18) (1993), 917-921.
6. Van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, Van Gijn, Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients, Stroke 19(5) (1988), 604-607.
7. Wolfe CD, Taub NA, Woodrow EJ, Burney PG, Assessment of scales of disability and handicap for stroke patients, Stroke 22(10) (1991), 1242-1244.
8. Kwon S, Hartzema A, Duncan P, Min-Lai S, Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 35 (2004), 918-923.
9. De Hann R, Limburg M, Schuling J, Broeshart J, Aaronson N, The clinical meaning of Rankin handicap grades after stroke, Stroke 26(11) (1995), 2027-2030.
10. Rankin J, cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60.II. Prognosis, Scott Med J2(5) (1957), 200-215.
11. Uyttenboogaart M, Luijckx GJ, Vroomen PC, Stewart RE, De Keyser J,Measuring disability in stroke: relationship between themodified Rankin Scale and the Barthel Index, J Neurol 254 (2007), 1113-1117.
12. Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, Alberts MJ, Chaturvedi S, Feldmann E, Hatsukami TS, Higashida RT, Johnston SC, Kidwell CS, Lutsep HL, Miller E, Sacco RL, Definition of transient ischemic attack, Stroke 40 (2009), 2276-2293.
13. Spread VI edizione. Ictus Cerebrale: linee guida italiane di prevenzione e trattamento. Pubblicazioni Catel Division-Pierrel Research Italy SpA, Milano 2010.
14. Brott T, Adams HP, et al., Measurement of acute cerebral infarciction: a clinical examination scale, Stroke 20(7) (1987), 864-870.
15. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia, Eur Neurol 19 (1980), 382-389.
16. Van PeppenRP,KwakkelG,Wood-Dauphinee S,HendriksHJ, Van derWees PJ, Dekker J, The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil 18(8) (2004), 833-862.
17. Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S, Min Lai S, Richards L, Perera S, Wu SSm, Improvements in speed-based gait classification are meaningful, Stroke 38 (2007) 2096-2100.
18. Plats T,Winter T, Muller N, Pinkowski C, Eickhof C, Mauritz KH, Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: a single-blind, randomised, controlled trial, Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 82 (2001), 961-968.