SSD-based rating system for the classification of pesticide risk on biodiversity

Ecotoxicology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1050-1062

  Sala, Serenella ^a,b   Migliorati, Sonia ^a   Monti, Gianna S ^a   Vighi, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aquatic community; Biodiversity; Nonparametric tests; Pesticide; Risk index; Species sensitivity distribution

Indexed keywords

INSECTICIDE; ORGANOPHOSPHORUS COMPOUND; PESTICIDE; SURFACE WATER;

AQUATIC COMMUNITY; BIODIVERSITY; ECOTOXICOLOGY; PESTICIDE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; ECOTOXICOLOGY; FISH; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ORGANISM COMMUNITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTION BASED RATING SYSTEM; TERRESTRIAL SPECIES;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESH WATER; ORGANOPHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS; PESTICIDES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84862869150     PISSN: 09639292     EISSN: 15733017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-012-0858-7     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson TW, Darling DA (1952) Asymptotic theory of certain "goodness-of-fit" criteria based on stochastic processes. Ann Mat Stat 23:193-212
2. Bartlett MS (1937) Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proc R Stat Soc Ser A 160:268-282
3. Bonzini S, Berra E, Forcella M, Parenti P, Vighi M (2008) Effects of river pollution on the colonisation of artificial substrates by macrozoobenthos. Aquat Toxicol 89:1-10
4. Craig PS, Luttik R, Hart A (2012) Species non-exchangeability in probabilistic ecotoxicological risk assessment. J R Stat Soc A 175(1) (in press)
5. Duboudin C, Ciffroy P, Magaud H (2004) Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distribution. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:489-499
6. EC (1991) Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Annex VI - uniform principles for evaluation and authorization of plant protection products. Off J Eur Comm L 230 19/8/1991
7. EC (2003a) Technical guidance document on risk assessment in support of commission directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances and the commission regulation (EC) 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances and directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, European Chemical Bureau, EUR 20418 EN/4
8. EC (2003b) Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document n 10. River and lakes - typology, reference conditions and classification systems. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2003. ISBN 92-894-5614-0, ISSN 1725-1087
9. EC 2011Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC) guidance document. Technical guidance for deriving environmental quality standards. Off J Eur Comm
10. Finizio A, Calliera M, Vighi M (2001) Rating systems for pesticide risk classification on different ecosystems. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 49:262-274
11. Gutsche V, Rossberg D (1998) SYNOPS2. In: Day E (Ed) Integrated pest management measurement systems workshop. Workshop held June 12-13 1998, Chicago, pp 99-113
12. Hommen U, Baveco JM, Galic JN, van den Brink PJ (2010) Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals I: review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6: 325-337
13. Ippolito A, Sala S, Faber JH, Vighi M (2010) Ecological vulnerability analysis: a river basin case study. Sci Tot Environ 408:3880-3890
14. Kolmogorov A (1941) Confidence limits for an unknown distribution function. Ann Mat Stat 12:461-463
15. Kooijman SALM (1987) A safety factor for LC50 values allowing for differences in sensitivity among species. Water Res 21:269-276
16. Kookana RS, Correl RL, Miller RB (2005) Pesticide impact rating index a pesticide indicator for water quality. Water Air Soil Pollut 5:45-65
17. Kwok KW, Leung À K, Lui À G, Chu VK, Lam À P, Morritt D, Maltby L, Brock TC, van den Brink PJ, Michael À À, Warne SJ, Crane M (2007) Comparison of tropical and temperate freshwater animal species' acute sensitivities to chemicals: implications for deriving safe extrapolation factors. Integr Environ Assess Manag 3:49-67
18. Lehmann EL, Romano JP (2010) Testing statistical hypotheses. Springer, New York
19. Liess M, Von der Ohe PC (2005) Analyzing effects of pesticides on invertebrate communities in streams. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:954-965
20. Luttik R, Hart A, Roelofs W, Craig P, Mineau P (2011) Variation in the level of protection afforded to birds and crustaceans exposed to different pesticides under standard risk assessment procedures. Integr Environ Assess Manag 7:459-465
21. Maltby L, Blake N, Brock TC, van den Brink PJ (2005) Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:379-388
22. Maltby L, Brock TCM, van den Brink PJ (2009) Fungicide risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems: Importance of interspecific variation, toxic mode of action, and exposure regime. Environ Sci Technol 43:7556-7563
23. Mayer FL Jr, Ellersieck M R (1986) Manual of acute toxicity: interpretation and data base for 410 chemicals and 66 species of freshwater animals. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior. Resource publication 160, Washington, D.C.
24. Mood AM, Graybill FA, Boes DC (1974) Introduction to the theory of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York
25. Nienstedt KM, Brock TCM, van Wensem J, Montforts M, Hart A, Aagaard A, Alix A, Boesten J, Bopp SK, Brown C, Capri E, Forbes V, Köpp H, Liess M, Luttik R, Maltby L, Sousa JP, Streissl F, Hardy AR (2011) Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides. Sci Tot Environ. doi:10.1016/j.sctotenv.2011.05.057
26. Posthuma L, Suter GW, Traas TP (eds) (2002) Species sensitivity distribution in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
27. Raimondo S, Vivian DN, Barron MG (2009) Standardizing acute toxicity data for use in ecotoxicology models: influence of test type, life stage, and concentration reporting. Ecotoxicology 18: 918-928
28. Reus J, Leendertse P, Bockstaller C, Fomsgaard I, Gutsche V, Lewis K, Nilsson CF, Pussemier L, Trevisan M, van der Werf H, Alfarroba F, Blümel S, Isart J, McGrath D, Seppälä T (2002) Comparison and evaluation of eight pesticide environmental risk indicators developed in Europe and recommendations for future use. Agric Ecosyst Environ 90:177-187
29. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591-611
30. Smirnov NV (1948) Table for estimating the goodness of fit of empirical distributions. Ann Math Stat 19:279-281
31. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Oxford
32. Solomon KR, Takacs P (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment using species sensitivity distribution. In: Posthuma L, Suter GW, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distribution in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
33. Tixier P, Malèzieux E, Dorela M, Bockstaller C, Girardin P (2007) Rpest: An indicator linked to a crop model to assess the dynamics of the risk of pesticide water pollution: application to banana-based cropping systems. Eur J Agron 26:71-81
34. Traas TP, van de Meent D, Posthuma L, Hamers T, Kater BJ, de Zwart D, Aldenberg T (2002) The potentially affected fraction as a measure of ecological risk. In: Posthuma L, Suter G W, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distribution in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
35. USEPA (2007) ECOTOX user guide: ECOTOXicology Database System. Version 4.0. http:/www.epa.gov/ecotox. Accessed 15 July 2011
36. Van den Brink PJ, Brock TCM, Posthuma L, (2002) The value of the Species Sensitivity Distribution concept for predicting field effects: (non-)confirmation of the concept using semifield experiments. In: Posthuma L, Suter GW, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distribution in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
37. Van den Brink PJ, Blake N, Brock TCM, Maltby L (2006) Predictive value of species sensitivity distributions for effects of herbicides in freshwater ecosystems. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 12:645-674
38. Van Leeuwen CJ (1990) Ecotoxicological effect assessment in the Netherlands, recent developments. Environ Manag 14:779-792
39. Van Straalen NM, Denneman CAJ (1989) Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 17:190-204
40. Van Straalen N M, van Leeuwen C J (2002) European history of Species Sensitivity Distribution, in: Posthuma L, Suter GW, Traas TP (Eds.) Species Sensitivity Distribution in Ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton., F.L.
41. Verro R, Finizio A, Otto S, Vighi M (2009) Predicting pesticide environmental risk in intensive agricultural areas. I: risk of individual chemicals in surface waters. Environ Sci Technol 43:522-529
42. Wagner C, Løkke H (1991) Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data. Water Res 25:1237-1242
43. Wang B, Yu G, Huang J, Hu H (2008) Development of species sensitivity distributions and estimation of HC5 of organochlorine pesticides with five statistical approaches. Ecotoxicology 17: 716-724